富血小板血浆作为裂皮移植辅助治疗烧伤患者颗粒性伤口的疗效和安全性:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究方案

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Trials Pub Date : 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1186/s13063-025-08757-2
Susmita Behera, Biswajit Mishra, Jerin Jose Cherian, Gunjan Kumar, Smita Mahapatra, Aparna Mukherjee, Sudipto Roy, Bhavani Shankara Bagepally, Binay Bhusan Sahoo, Madan Mohan Majhi, S ShoganRaj, Vijay Kumar, Arindam Sarkar, P Nellaiappar
{"title":"富血小板血浆作为裂皮移植辅助治疗烧伤患者颗粒性伤口的疗效和安全性:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究方案","authors":"Susmita Behera, Biswajit Mishra, Jerin Jose Cherian, Gunjan Kumar, Smita Mahapatra, Aparna Mukherjee, Sudipto Roy, Bhavani Shankara Bagepally, Binay Bhusan Sahoo, Madan Mohan Majhi, S ShoganRaj, Vijay Kumar, Arindam Sarkar, P Nellaiappar","doi":"10.1186/s13063-025-08757-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Burn wounds are commonly encountered in clinical settings and the management aims at the prevention of mortality and morbidity due to disability. The platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is blood-derived biomaterial that is enriched with growth factors and cytokines that facilitate wound healing. The PRP has proven its efficacy in various other wounds, but its role in post-burn raw areas and graft take has not been validated. This proposed multicentre randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma as an adjunct therapy to split-thickness skin graft in burn patients with granulating raw wounds.</p><p><strong>Method/design: </strong>This trial is an investigator-initiated, double-blind multicentre, randomized controlled parallel arm trial alongside trial cost-effectiveness analysis. Granulating deep second-degree and third-degree burns affecting 3-20% of total body surface area (TBSA) at 10-14th post-burn day will be included in the study. A total of 550 patients (275 in each group) will be randomized to receive either standard skin graft or allogenic PRP with skin graft treatment. The primary endpoint will be the mean percentage of graft-take on the 14th postoperative day. The result will be analyzed by two independent assessors who are blinded to the study. Secondary endpoints include (a) time taken for complete wound healing; (b) frequency of adverse events; (c) follow-up with scar index at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) score; (d) cost-effectiveness analysis of the intervention compared to the comparator; and (e) to estimate in a subset of participants the association between growth factor levels (PDGF BB and TGF ß-1) of activated PRP and clinical response.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The proposed trial will be expected to verify the efficacy and safety of PRP for split-thickness skin graft (STSG) in deep second-degree or third-degree granulating wounds of burn patients based on the outcome of the study.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"26 1","pages":"83"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11900483/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma as an adjunct therapy to split thickness skin graft in burn patients with granulating raw wounds: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study-study protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Susmita Behera, Biswajit Mishra, Jerin Jose Cherian, Gunjan Kumar, Smita Mahapatra, Aparna Mukherjee, Sudipto Roy, Bhavani Shankara Bagepally, Binay Bhusan Sahoo, Madan Mohan Majhi, S ShoganRaj, Vijay Kumar, Arindam Sarkar, P Nellaiappar\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13063-025-08757-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Burn wounds are commonly encountered in clinical settings and the management aims at the prevention of mortality and morbidity due to disability. The platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is blood-derived biomaterial that is enriched with growth factors and cytokines that facilitate wound healing. The PRP has proven its efficacy in various other wounds, but its role in post-burn raw areas and graft take has not been validated. This proposed multicentre randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma as an adjunct therapy to split-thickness skin graft in burn patients with granulating raw wounds.</p><p><strong>Method/design: </strong>This trial is an investigator-initiated, double-blind multicentre, randomized controlled parallel arm trial alongside trial cost-effectiveness analysis. Granulating deep second-degree and third-degree burns affecting 3-20% of total body surface area (TBSA) at 10-14th post-burn day will be included in the study. A total of 550 patients (275 in each group) will be randomized to receive either standard skin graft or allogenic PRP with skin graft treatment. The primary endpoint will be the mean percentage of graft-take on the 14th postoperative day. The result will be analyzed by two independent assessors who are blinded to the study. Secondary endpoints include (a) time taken for complete wound healing; (b) frequency of adverse events; (c) follow-up with scar index at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) score; (d) cost-effectiveness analysis of the intervention compared to the comparator; and (e) to estimate in a subset of participants the association between growth factor levels (PDGF BB and TGF ß-1) of activated PRP and clinical response.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The proposed trial will be expected to verify the efficacy and safety of PRP for split-thickness skin graft (STSG) in deep second-degree or third-degree granulating wounds of burn patients based on the outcome of the study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trials\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"83\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11900483/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-08757-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-08757-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:烧伤创面是临床常见的创面,其处理的目的是预防因残疾而导致的死亡率和发病率。富血小板血浆(PRP)是血液来源的生物材料,富含促进伤口愈合的生长因子和细胞因子。PRP已证明其在其他各种伤口的疗效,但其在烧伤后的生发区域和移植物的作用尚未得到证实。本多中心随机对照试验旨在评估富血小板血浆作为裂皮移植辅助治疗的有效性和安全性。方法/设计:本试验是一项研究者发起的、双盲、多中心、随机对照平行对照试验,同时进行试验成本-效果分析。在烧伤后10-14天,颗粒状深度二度和三度烧伤影响3-20%的体表面积(TBSA)将被纳入研究。共有550名患者(每组275名)将被随机分配接受标准皮肤移植或同种异体PRP与皮肤移植治疗。主要终点将是术后第14天的平均移植百分比。结果将由两名独立的评估人员进行分析,他们对研究不知情。次要终点包括(a)伤口完全愈合所需的时间;(b)不良事件发生频率;(c)使用患者和观察者疤痕评估量表(POSAS)评分在3个月、6个月和1年随访疤痕指数;(d)比较国干预措施的成本效益分析;(e)估计一部分参与者活化PRP的生长因子水平(PDGF BB和TGF ß-1)与临床反应之间的关系。讨论:拟议的试验将根据研究结果验证PRP用于烧伤患者深二度或三度肉芽创面的裂厚皮肤移植(STSG)的有效性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma as an adjunct therapy to split thickness skin graft in burn patients with granulating raw wounds: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study-study protocol.

Background: Burn wounds are commonly encountered in clinical settings and the management aims at the prevention of mortality and morbidity due to disability. The platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is blood-derived biomaterial that is enriched with growth factors and cytokines that facilitate wound healing. The PRP has proven its efficacy in various other wounds, but its role in post-burn raw areas and graft take has not been validated. This proposed multicentre randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma as an adjunct therapy to split-thickness skin graft in burn patients with granulating raw wounds.

Method/design: This trial is an investigator-initiated, double-blind multicentre, randomized controlled parallel arm trial alongside trial cost-effectiveness analysis. Granulating deep second-degree and third-degree burns affecting 3-20% of total body surface area (TBSA) at 10-14th post-burn day will be included in the study. A total of 550 patients (275 in each group) will be randomized to receive either standard skin graft or allogenic PRP with skin graft treatment. The primary endpoint will be the mean percentage of graft-take on the 14th postoperative day. The result will be analyzed by two independent assessors who are blinded to the study. Secondary endpoints include (a) time taken for complete wound healing; (b) frequency of adverse events; (c) follow-up with scar index at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) score; (d) cost-effectiveness analysis of the intervention compared to the comparator; and (e) to estimate in a subset of participants the association between growth factor levels (PDGF BB and TGF ß-1) of activated PRP and clinical response.

Discussion: The proposed trial will be expected to verify the efficacy and safety of PRP for split-thickness skin graft (STSG) in deep second-degree or third-degree granulating wounds of burn patients based on the outcome of the study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信