“便秘”:一项观察性研究表明,一个词在癌症患者中有多种含义。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative Medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1177/02692163251325711
Andrew Davies, Norah Fagan, Jenny Power, Amy Taylor
{"title":"“便秘”:一项观察性研究表明,一个词在癌症患者中有多种含义。","authors":"Andrew Davies, Norah Fagan, Jenny Power, Amy Taylor","doi":"10.1177/02692163251325711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Constipation is common in people with advanced cancer and is associated with significant morbidity and health economic burden, but it is often sub-optimally managed. Despite international consensus diagnostic criteria for functional and opioid-induced constipation (Rome IV diagnostic criteria), the term 'constipation' means different things to different people, impacting assessment, diagnosis and management.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the association between persons with advanced cancer self-reporting of constipation, response to the Rome IV diagnostic criteria statements for opioid-induced constipation and differences according to personal demographics.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicentre prospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting/participants: </strong>Twenty-four community, hospice and hospital research sites in 10 European countries recruited 1200 adults with cancer taking opioids for cancer/cancer-treatment related pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In response to the simple question <i>'Are you constipated?'</i>, 549 (45.5%) participants replied 'yes', 588 (49%) replied 'no' and 59 (5%) were 'unsure', but 713 (59.5%) participants met the Rome IV diagnostic criteria. Only 439 (61.5%) participants that met these criteria answered the simple question positively, whilst 230 (39%) answered negatively, although there was a statistically significant association between responses to the simple question and the criteria (χ<sup>2</sup>(1, <i>N</i> = 1136) = 149.945, <i>p</i> = 0.00001). There were certain significant differences in self-reporting according to age and country of origin.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is disparity between patients' self-reporting of constipation and the Rome IV diagnostic criteria. People with advanced cancer, especially those receiving opioid analgesics, need to be regularly assessed for constipation, but the use of a single question (<i>'Are you constipated?'</i>) is inadequate.Registry: European Study of Opioid Induced Constipation (E-StOIC), NCT05149833, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05149833, 08/12/2021.</p>","PeriodicalId":19849,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"553-562"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'Constipation': One word, many meanings amongst persons with cancer: An observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Davies, Norah Fagan, Jenny Power, Amy Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02692163251325711\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Constipation is common in people with advanced cancer and is associated with significant morbidity and health economic burden, but it is often sub-optimally managed. Despite international consensus diagnostic criteria for functional and opioid-induced constipation (Rome IV diagnostic criteria), the term 'constipation' means different things to different people, impacting assessment, diagnosis and management.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the association between persons with advanced cancer self-reporting of constipation, response to the Rome IV diagnostic criteria statements for opioid-induced constipation and differences according to personal demographics.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicentre prospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting/participants: </strong>Twenty-four community, hospice and hospital research sites in 10 European countries recruited 1200 adults with cancer taking opioids for cancer/cancer-treatment related pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In response to the simple question <i>'Are you constipated?'</i>, 549 (45.5%) participants replied 'yes', 588 (49%) replied 'no' and 59 (5%) were 'unsure', but 713 (59.5%) participants met the Rome IV diagnostic criteria. Only 439 (61.5%) participants that met these criteria answered the simple question positively, whilst 230 (39%) answered negatively, although there was a statistically significant association between responses to the simple question and the criteria (χ<sup>2</sup>(1, <i>N</i> = 1136) = 149.945, <i>p</i> = 0.00001). There were certain significant differences in self-reporting according to age and country of origin.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is disparity between patients' self-reporting of constipation and the Rome IV diagnostic criteria. People with advanced cancer, especially those receiving opioid analgesics, need to be regularly assessed for constipation, but the use of a single question (<i>'Are you constipated?'</i>) is inadequate.Registry: European Study of Opioid Induced Constipation (E-StOIC), NCT05149833, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05149833, 08/12/2021.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palliative Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"553-562\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palliative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163251325711\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163251325711","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:便秘在晚期癌症患者中很常见,并与显著的发病率和健康经济负担相关,但往往管理不善。尽管功能性便秘和阿片类药物引起的便秘的国际共识诊断标准(罗马IV诊断标准),“便秘”一词对不同的人意味着不同的东西,影响评估、诊断和管理。目的:探讨晚期癌症患者便秘自述与阿片类药物引起便秘的罗马IV诊断标准陈述的反应之间的关系以及个人人口统计学差异。设计:多中心前瞻性观察研究。环境/参与者:10个欧洲国家的24个社区、临终关怀和医院研究点招募了1200名患有癌症的成年人,他们服用阿片类药物来治疗癌症/癌症治疗相关的疼痛。结果:在回答“你便秘吗?”, 549名(45.5%)参与者回答“是”,588名(49%)回答“否”,59名(5%)回答“不确定”,但713名(59.5%)参与者符合罗马IV诊断标准。只有439(61.5%)名符合这些标准的参与者对简单问题的回答是肯定的,而230(39%)名回答是否定的,尽管对简单问题的回答与标准之间存在统计学上显著的关联(χ2(1, N = 1136) = 149.945, p = 0.00001)。根据年龄和原籍国的不同,自我报告有一定的显著差异。结论:患者自述便秘与罗马IV诊断标准存在差异。晚期癌症患者,特别是那些接受阿片类镇痛药的患者,需要定期进行便秘评估,但使用一个问题(“你便秘吗?”)是不够的。注册:欧洲阿片类药物诱导便秘研究(E-StOIC), NCT05149833, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05149833, 08/12/2021。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
'Constipation': One word, many meanings amongst persons with cancer: An observational study.

Background: Constipation is common in people with advanced cancer and is associated with significant morbidity and health economic burden, but it is often sub-optimally managed. Despite international consensus diagnostic criteria for functional and opioid-induced constipation (Rome IV diagnostic criteria), the term 'constipation' means different things to different people, impacting assessment, diagnosis and management.

Aim: To investigate the association between persons with advanced cancer self-reporting of constipation, response to the Rome IV diagnostic criteria statements for opioid-induced constipation and differences according to personal demographics.

Design: Multicentre prospective observational study.

Setting/participants: Twenty-four community, hospice and hospital research sites in 10 European countries recruited 1200 adults with cancer taking opioids for cancer/cancer-treatment related pain.

Results: In response to the simple question 'Are you constipated?', 549 (45.5%) participants replied 'yes', 588 (49%) replied 'no' and 59 (5%) were 'unsure', but 713 (59.5%) participants met the Rome IV diagnostic criteria. Only 439 (61.5%) participants that met these criteria answered the simple question positively, whilst 230 (39%) answered negatively, although there was a statistically significant association between responses to the simple question and the criteria (χ2(1, N = 1136) = 149.945, p = 0.00001). There were certain significant differences in self-reporting according to age and country of origin.

Conclusions: There is disparity between patients' self-reporting of constipation and the Rome IV diagnostic criteria. People with advanced cancer, especially those receiving opioid analgesics, need to be regularly assessed for constipation, but the use of a single question ('Are you constipated?') is inadequate.Registry: European Study of Opioid Induced Constipation (E-StOIC), NCT05149833, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05149833, 08/12/2021.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative Medicine
Palliative Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
125
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Palliative Medicine is a highly ranked, peer reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to improving knowledge and clinical practice in the palliative care of patients with far advanced disease. This outstanding journal features editorials, original papers, review articles, case reports, correspondence and book reviews. Essential reading for all members of the palliative care team. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信