全球多样性模式的解释是多样化率和分散在古代,而不是浅,时间尺度。

IF 5.7 1区 生物学 Q1 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Patrick R Stephens, Maxwell J Farrell, T Jonathan Davies, John L Gittleman, Shai Meiri, Matthew O Moreira, Uri Roll, John J Wiens
{"title":"全球多样性模式的解释是多样化率和分散在古代,而不是浅,时间尺度。","authors":"Patrick R Stephens, Maxwell J Farrell, T Jonathan Davies, John L Gittleman, Shai Meiri, Matthew O Moreira, Uri Roll, John J Wiens","doi":"10.1093/sysbio/syaf018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Explaining global species richness patterns is a major goal of evolution, ecology, and biogeography. These richness patterns are often attributed to spatial variation in diversification rates (speciation minus extinction). Surprisingly, prominent studies of birds, fish, and plants have reported higher speciation and/or diversification rates at higher latitudes, where species richness is lower. We hypothesize that these surprising findings are explained by the focus of those studies on relatively recent macroevolutionary rates, within the last ~20 million years. Here, we analyze global richness patterns among 10,213 squamates (lizards and snakes) and explore their underlying causes. We find that when diversification rates were quantified at more recent timescales, we observed mismatched patterns of rates and richness, similar to previous studies in other taxa. Importantly, diversification rates estimated over longer timescales were instead positively related to geographic richness patterns. These observations may help resolve the paradoxical results of previous studies in other taxa. We found that diversification rates were largely unrelated to climate, even though climate and richness were related. Instead, higher tropical richness was related to ancient occupation of tropical regions, with colonization time the variable that explained the most variation in richness overall. We suggest that large-scale diversity patterns might be best understood by considering climate, deep-time diversification rates, and the time spent in different regions, rather than recent diversification rates alone. [Climate, colonization time, diversification rate, lizards, latitudinal diversity gradient, snakes, species richness].</p>","PeriodicalId":22120,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global Diversity Patterns are Explained by Diversification Rates and Dispersal at Ancient, not Shallow, Timescales.\",\"authors\":\"Patrick R Stephens, Maxwell J Farrell, T Jonathan Davies, John L Gittleman, Shai Meiri, Matthew O Moreira, Uri Roll, John J Wiens\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/sysbio/syaf018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Explaining global species richness patterns is a major goal of evolution, ecology, and biogeography. These richness patterns are often attributed to spatial variation in diversification rates (speciation minus extinction). Surprisingly, prominent studies of birds, fish, and plants have reported higher speciation and/or diversification rates at higher latitudes, where species richness is lower. We hypothesize that these surprising findings are explained by the focus of those studies on relatively recent macroevolutionary rates, within the last ~20 million years. Here, we analyze global richness patterns among 10,213 squamates (lizards and snakes) and explore their underlying causes. We find that when diversification rates were quantified at more recent timescales, we observed mismatched patterns of rates and richness, similar to previous studies in other taxa. Importantly, diversification rates estimated over longer timescales were instead positively related to geographic richness patterns. These observations may help resolve the paradoxical results of previous studies in other taxa. We found that diversification rates were largely unrelated to climate, even though climate and richness were related. Instead, higher tropical richness was related to ancient occupation of tropical regions, with colonization time the variable that explained the most variation in richness overall. We suggest that large-scale diversity patterns might be best understood by considering climate, deep-time diversification rates, and the time spent in different regions, rather than recent diversification rates alone. [Climate, colonization time, diversification rate, lizards, latitudinal diversity gradient, snakes, species richness].</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Systematic Biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Systematic Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syaf018\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syaf018","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

解释全球物种丰富度格局是进化、生态学和生物地理学的主要目标。这些丰富度格局通常归因于多样化率的空间变化(物种形成减去灭绝)。令人惊讶的是,对鸟类、鱼类和植物的著名研究报告称,在物种丰富度较低的高纬度地区,物种形成和/或多样化率更高。我们假设,这些令人惊讶的发现可以通过这些研究的重点来解释,这些研究集中在相对较近的宏观进化速率上,在过去的~ 2000万年里。本文分析了10213种有鳞动物(蜥蜴和蛇)的全球丰富度格局,并探讨了其根本原因。我们发现,当在最近的时间尺度上量化多样化率时,我们观察到率和丰富度的不匹配模式,类似于之前在其他分类群中的研究。重要的是,在较长时间尺度上估计的多样化率与地理丰富度模式呈正相关。这些观察可能有助于解决先前在其他分类群中研究的矛盾结果。我们发现,尽管气候和丰富度相关,但多样性率在很大程度上与气候无关。相反,较高的热带丰富度与热带地区的古代占领有关,殖民时间是解释丰富度总体变化的最大变量。我们建议通过考虑气候、深度时间多样化率和在不同地区花费的时间,而不是仅仅考虑最近的多样化率,来更好地理解大规模的多样性模式。[气候,定殖时间,多样化率,蜥蜴,纬度多样性梯度,蛇,物种丰富度]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Global Diversity Patterns are Explained by Diversification Rates and Dispersal at Ancient, not Shallow, Timescales.

Explaining global species richness patterns is a major goal of evolution, ecology, and biogeography. These richness patterns are often attributed to spatial variation in diversification rates (speciation minus extinction). Surprisingly, prominent studies of birds, fish, and plants have reported higher speciation and/or diversification rates at higher latitudes, where species richness is lower. We hypothesize that these surprising findings are explained by the focus of those studies on relatively recent macroevolutionary rates, within the last ~20 million years. Here, we analyze global richness patterns among 10,213 squamates (lizards and snakes) and explore their underlying causes. We find that when diversification rates were quantified at more recent timescales, we observed mismatched patterns of rates and richness, similar to previous studies in other taxa. Importantly, diversification rates estimated over longer timescales were instead positively related to geographic richness patterns. These observations may help resolve the paradoxical results of previous studies in other taxa. We found that diversification rates were largely unrelated to climate, even though climate and richness were related. Instead, higher tropical richness was related to ancient occupation of tropical regions, with colonization time the variable that explained the most variation in richness overall. We suggest that large-scale diversity patterns might be best understood by considering climate, deep-time diversification rates, and the time spent in different regions, rather than recent diversification rates alone. [Climate, colonization time, diversification rate, lizards, latitudinal diversity gradient, snakes, species richness].

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Systematic Biology
Systematic Biology 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
70
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Biology is the bimonthly journal of the Society of Systematic Biologists. Papers for the journal are original contributions to the theory, principles, and methods of systematics as well as phylogeny, evolution, morphology, biogeography, paleontology, genetics, and the classification of all living things. A Points of View section offers a forum for discussion, while book reviews and announcements of general interest are also featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信