监管决策中的真实世界数据和真实世界证据:国际医学科学组织理事会(CIOMS)工作组第十三期报告摘要。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Sean Hennessy, Yoshiko Atsuta, Sanna Hill, Lembit Rägo, Juhaeri Juhaeri
{"title":"监管决策中的真实世界数据和真实世界证据:国际医学科学组织理事会(CIOMS)工作组第十三期报告摘要。","authors":"Sean Hennessy, Yoshiko Atsuta, Sanna Hill, Lembit Rägo, Juhaeri Juhaeri","doi":"10.1002/pds.70117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Data from sources other than traditional randomized clinical trials are known as real-world data (RWD), and the evidence derived from the review and analysis of RWD is known as real-world evidence (RWE). RWD and RWE are used increasingly throughout the lifecycle of medicinal products to provide evidence about their effectiveness and safety. Recent regulatory guidance about RWE and approvals based on the use of RWE to demonstrate beneficial effects of products have created an urgency to develop generally accepted processes that promote trust in the evidence-generation process. A recent report from a working group of the Council for International Organizations of Medical Science (CIOMS) describes the use of RWE for decision making in the lifecycle of medical products, describes RWD and data sources, discusses key scientific considerations in the generation of RWE, and discusses ethical and governance issues related to the use of RWD. This paper provides a high-level summary of this report. More work remains to be done to globally harmonize practices and guidance for using RWD and RWE for regulatory decision making, thereby maximizing the benefits they can bring to patient care and public health.</p>","PeriodicalId":19782,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"34 3","pages":"e70117"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11897686/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-World Data and Real-World Evidence in Regulatory Decision Making: Report Summary From the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) Working Group XIII.\",\"authors\":\"Sean Hennessy, Yoshiko Atsuta, Sanna Hill, Lembit Rägo, Juhaeri Juhaeri\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pds.70117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Data from sources other than traditional randomized clinical trials are known as real-world data (RWD), and the evidence derived from the review and analysis of RWD is known as real-world evidence (RWE). RWD and RWE are used increasingly throughout the lifecycle of medicinal products to provide evidence about their effectiveness and safety. Recent regulatory guidance about RWE and approvals based on the use of RWE to demonstrate beneficial effects of products have created an urgency to develop generally accepted processes that promote trust in the evidence-generation process. A recent report from a working group of the Council for International Organizations of Medical Science (CIOMS) describes the use of RWE for decision making in the lifecycle of medical products, describes RWD and data sources, discusses key scientific considerations in the generation of RWE, and discusses ethical and governance issues related to the use of RWD. This paper provides a high-level summary of this report. More work remains to be done to globally harmonize practices and guidance for using RWD and RWE for regulatory decision making, thereby maximizing the benefits they can bring to patient care and public health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"e70117\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11897686/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70117\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70117","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

来自传统随机临床试验以外来源的数据被称为真实世界数据(RWD),从RWD的回顾和分析中获得的证据被称为真实世界证据(RWE)。RWD和RWE越来越多地用于药品的整个生命周期,以提供其有效性和安全性的证据。最近关于RWE的监管指导和基于使用RWE来证明产品有益效果的批准,迫切需要制定普遍接受的流程,以促进对证据生成过程的信任。国际医学科学组织理事会(CIOMS)一个工作组最近的一份报告描述了在医疗产品的生命周期中使用RWE进行决策,描述了RWD和数据源,讨论了生成RWE时的关键科学考虑因素,并讨论了与使用RWD有关的伦理和治理问题。本文对该报告作了简要概述。要在全球范围内统一使用RWD和RWE进行监管决策的做法和指导,从而最大限度地发挥它们给病人护理和公共卫生带来的好处,还需要做更多的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-World Data and Real-World Evidence in Regulatory Decision Making: Report Summary From the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) Working Group XIII.

Data from sources other than traditional randomized clinical trials are known as real-world data (RWD), and the evidence derived from the review and analysis of RWD is known as real-world evidence (RWE). RWD and RWE are used increasingly throughout the lifecycle of medicinal products to provide evidence about their effectiveness and safety. Recent regulatory guidance about RWE and approvals based on the use of RWE to demonstrate beneficial effects of products have created an urgency to develop generally accepted processes that promote trust in the evidence-generation process. A recent report from a working group of the Council for International Organizations of Medical Science (CIOMS) describes the use of RWE for decision making in the lifecycle of medical products, describes RWD and data sources, discusses key scientific considerations in the generation of RWE, and discusses ethical and governance issues related to the use of RWD. This paper provides a high-level summary of this report. More work remains to be done to globally harmonize practices and guidance for using RWD and RWE for regulatory decision making, thereby maximizing the benefits they can bring to patient care and public health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
173
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The aim of Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety is to provide an international forum for the communication and evaluation of data, methods and opinion in the discipline of pharmacoepidemiology. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed reports of original research, invited reviews and a variety of guest editorials and commentaries embracing scientific, medical, statistical, legal and economic aspects of pharmacoepidemiology and post-marketing surveillance of drug safety. Appropriate material in these categories may also be considered for publication as a Brief Report. Particular areas of interest include: design, analysis, results, and interpretation of studies looking at the benefit or safety of specific pharmaceuticals, biologics, or medical devices, including studies in pharmacovigilance, postmarketing surveillance, pharmacoeconomics, patient safety, molecular pharmacoepidemiology, or any other study within the broad field of pharmacoepidemiology; comparative effectiveness research relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics, and medical devices. Comparative effectiveness research is the generation and synthesis of evidence that compares the benefits and harms of alternative methods to prevent, diagnose, treat, and monitor a clinical condition, as these methods are truly used in the real world; methodologic contributions of relevance to pharmacoepidemiology, whether original contributions, reviews of existing methods, or tutorials for how to apply the methods of pharmacoepidemiology; assessments of harm versus benefit in drug therapy; patterns of drug utilization; relationships between pharmacoepidemiology and the formulation and interpretation of regulatory guidelines; evaluations of risk management plans and programmes relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics and medical devices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信