Sean Hennessy, Yoshiko Atsuta, Sanna Hill, Lembit Rägo, Juhaeri Juhaeri
{"title":"监管决策中的真实世界数据和真实世界证据:国际医学科学组织理事会(CIOMS)工作组第十三期报告摘要。","authors":"Sean Hennessy, Yoshiko Atsuta, Sanna Hill, Lembit Rägo, Juhaeri Juhaeri","doi":"10.1002/pds.70117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Data from sources other than traditional randomized clinical trials are known as real-world data (RWD), and the evidence derived from the review and analysis of RWD is known as real-world evidence (RWE). RWD and RWE are used increasingly throughout the lifecycle of medicinal products to provide evidence about their effectiveness and safety. Recent regulatory guidance about RWE and approvals based on the use of RWE to demonstrate beneficial effects of products have created an urgency to develop generally accepted processes that promote trust in the evidence-generation process. A recent report from a working group of the Council for International Organizations of Medical Science (CIOMS) describes the use of RWE for decision making in the lifecycle of medical products, describes RWD and data sources, discusses key scientific considerations in the generation of RWE, and discusses ethical and governance issues related to the use of RWD. This paper provides a high-level summary of this report. More work remains to be done to globally harmonize practices and guidance for using RWD and RWE for regulatory decision making, thereby maximizing the benefits they can bring to patient care and public health.</p>","PeriodicalId":19782,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"34 3","pages":"e70117"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11897686/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-World Data and Real-World Evidence in Regulatory Decision Making: Report Summary From the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) Working Group XIII.\",\"authors\":\"Sean Hennessy, Yoshiko Atsuta, Sanna Hill, Lembit Rägo, Juhaeri Juhaeri\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pds.70117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Data from sources other than traditional randomized clinical trials are known as real-world data (RWD), and the evidence derived from the review and analysis of RWD is known as real-world evidence (RWE). RWD and RWE are used increasingly throughout the lifecycle of medicinal products to provide evidence about their effectiveness and safety. Recent regulatory guidance about RWE and approvals based on the use of RWE to demonstrate beneficial effects of products have created an urgency to develop generally accepted processes that promote trust in the evidence-generation process. A recent report from a working group of the Council for International Organizations of Medical Science (CIOMS) describes the use of RWE for decision making in the lifecycle of medical products, describes RWD and data sources, discusses key scientific considerations in the generation of RWE, and discusses ethical and governance issues related to the use of RWD. This paper provides a high-level summary of this report. More work remains to be done to globally harmonize practices and guidance for using RWD and RWE for regulatory decision making, thereby maximizing the benefits they can bring to patient care and public health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"e70117\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11897686/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70117\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70117","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Real-World Data and Real-World Evidence in Regulatory Decision Making: Report Summary From the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) Working Group XIII.
Data from sources other than traditional randomized clinical trials are known as real-world data (RWD), and the evidence derived from the review and analysis of RWD is known as real-world evidence (RWE). RWD and RWE are used increasingly throughout the lifecycle of medicinal products to provide evidence about their effectiveness and safety. Recent regulatory guidance about RWE and approvals based on the use of RWE to demonstrate beneficial effects of products have created an urgency to develop generally accepted processes that promote trust in the evidence-generation process. A recent report from a working group of the Council for International Organizations of Medical Science (CIOMS) describes the use of RWE for decision making in the lifecycle of medical products, describes RWD and data sources, discusses key scientific considerations in the generation of RWE, and discusses ethical and governance issues related to the use of RWD. This paper provides a high-level summary of this report. More work remains to be done to globally harmonize practices and guidance for using RWD and RWE for regulatory decision making, thereby maximizing the benefits they can bring to patient care and public health.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety is to provide an international forum for the communication and evaluation of data, methods and opinion in the discipline of pharmacoepidemiology. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed reports of original research, invited reviews and a variety of guest editorials and commentaries embracing scientific, medical, statistical, legal and economic aspects of pharmacoepidemiology and post-marketing surveillance of drug safety. Appropriate material in these categories may also be considered for publication as a Brief Report.
Particular areas of interest include:
design, analysis, results, and interpretation of studies looking at the benefit or safety of specific pharmaceuticals, biologics, or medical devices, including studies in pharmacovigilance, postmarketing surveillance, pharmacoeconomics, patient safety, molecular pharmacoepidemiology, or any other study within the broad field of pharmacoepidemiology;
comparative effectiveness research relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics, and medical devices. Comparative effectiveness research is the generation and synthesis of evidence that compares the benefits and harms of alternative methods to prevent, diagnose, treat, and monitor a clinical condition, as these methods are truly used in the real world;
methodologic contributions of relevance to pharmacoepidemiology, whether original contributions, reviews of existing methods, or tutorials for how to apply the methods of pharmacoepidemiology;
assessments of harm versus benefit in drug therapy;
patterns of drug utilization;
relationships between pharmacoepidemiology and the formulation and interpretation of regulatory guidelines;
evaluations of risk management plans and programmes relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics and medical devices.