利用互联网搜索数据评估公众对乳房x线摄影、计算机断层扫描肺癌筛查和计算机断层扫描结肠镜筛查检查的兴趣:横断面研究。

IF 3.3 Q2 ONCOLOGY
JMIR Cancer Pub Date : 2025-03-11 DOI:10.2196/53328
Zachary D Zippi, Isabel O Cortopassi, Rolf A Grage, Elizabeth M Johnson, Matthew R McCann, Patricia J Mergo, Sushil K Sonavane, Justin T Stowell, Brent P Little
{"title":"利用互联网搜索数据评估公众对乳房x线摄影、计算机断层扫描肺癌筛查和计算机断层扫描结肠镜筛查检查的兴趣:横断面研究。","authors":"Zachary D Zippi, Isabel O Cortopassi, Rolf A Grage, Elizabeth M Johnson, Matthew R McCann, Patricia J Mergo, Sushil K Sonavane, Justin T Stowell, Brent P Little","doi":"10.2196/53328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The noninvasive imaging examinations of mammography (MG), low-dose computed tomography (CT) for lung cancer screening (LCS), and CT colonography (CTC) play important roles in screening for the most common cancer types. Internet search data can be used to gauge public interest in screening techniques, assess common screening-related questions and concerns, and formulate public awareness strategies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to compare historical Google search volumes for MG, LCS, and CTC and to determine the most common search topics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Google Trends data were used to quantify relative Google search frequencies for these imaging screening modalities over the last 2 decades. A commercial search engine tracking product (keywordtool.io) was used to assess the content of related Google queries over the year from May 1, 2022, to April 30, 2023, and 2 authors used an iterative process to agree upon a list of thematic categories for these queries. Queries with at least 10 monthly instances were independently assigned to the most appropriate category by the 2 authors, with disagreements resolved by consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean 20-year relative search volume for MG was approximately 10-fold higher than for LCS and 25-fold higher than for CTC. Search volumes for LCS have trended upward since 2011. The most common topics of MG-related searches included nearby screening locations (60,850/253,810, 24%) and inquiries about procedural discomfort (28,970/253,810, 11%). Most common LCS-related searches included CT-specific inquiries (5380/11,150, 48%) or general inquiries (1790/11,150, 16%), use of artificial intelligence or deep learning (1210/11,150, 11%), and eligibility criteria (1020/11,150, 9%). For CTC, the most common searches were CT-specific inquiries (1800/5590, 32%) or procedural details (1380/5590, 25%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Over the past 2 decades, Google search volumes have been significantly higher for MG than for either LCS or CTC, although search volumes for LCS have trended upward since 2011. Knowledge of public interest and queries related to imaging-based screening techniques may help guide public awareness efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":45538,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Cancer","volume":"11 ","pages":"e53328"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11918978/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Public Interest in Mammography, Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening, and Computed Tomography Colonography Screening Examinations Using Internet Search Data: Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Zachary D Zippi, Isabel O Cortopassi, Rolf A Grage, Elizabeth M Johnson, Matthew R McCann, Patricia J Mergo, Sushil K Sonavane, Justin T Stowell, Brent P Little\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/53328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The noninvasive imaging examinations of mammography (MG), low-dose computed tomography (CT) for lung cancer screening (LCS), and CT colonography (CTC) play important roles in screening for the most common cancer types. Internet search data can be used to gauge public interest in screening techniques, assess common screening-related questions and concerns, and formulate public awareness strategies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to compare historical Google search volumes for MG, LCS, and CTC and to determine the most common search topics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Google Trends data were used to quantify relative Google search frequencies for these imaging screening modalities over the last 2 decades. A commercial search engine tracking product (keywordtool.io) was used to assess the content of related Google queries over the year from May 1, 2022, to April 30, 2023, and 2 authors used an iterative process to agree upon a list of thematic categories for these queries. Queries with at least 10 monthly instances were independently assigned to the most appropriate category by the 2 authors, with disagreements resolved by consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean 20-year relative search volume for MG was approximately 10-fold higher than for LCS and 25-fold higher than for CTC. Search volumes for LCS have trended upward since 2011. The most common topics of MG-related searches included nearby screening locations (60,850/253,810, 24%) and inquiries about procedural discomfort (28,970/253,810, 11%). Most common LCS-related searches included CT-specific inquiries (5380/11,150, 48%) or general inquiries (1790/11,150, 16%), use of artificial intelligence or deep learning (1210/11,150, 11%), and eligibility criteria (1020/11,150, 9%). For CTC, the most common searches were CT-specific inquiries (1800/5590, 32%) or procedural details (1380/5590, 25%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Over the past 2 decades, Google search volumes have been significantly higher for MG than for either LCS or CTC, although search volumes for LCS have trended upward since 2011. Knowledge of public interest and queries related to imaging-based screening techniques may help guide public awareness efforts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Cancer\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"e53328\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11918978/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/53328\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/53328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:乳房x线摄影(MG)、低剂量CT肺癌筛查(LCS)和CT结肠镜检查(CTC)等无创影像学检查在筛查最常见的癌症类型中发挥着重要作用。互联网搜索数据可以用来衡量公众对筛查技术的兴趣,评估常见的筛查相关问题和关注,并制定公众意识策略。目的:本研究旨在比较MG、LCS和CTC的历史谷歌搜索量,并确定最常见的搜索主题。方法:使用谷歌趋势数据来量化这些成像筛查方式在过去20年中的相对谷歌搜索频率。一个商业搜索引擎跟踪产品(keywordtool.io)被用来评估从2022年5月1日到2023年4月30日的相关谷歌查询的内容,两位作者使用迭代过程来商定这些查询的主题类别列表。每月至少有10个实例的查询由两位作者独立分配到最合适的类别,分歧通过共识解决。结果:MG的平均20年相对搜索量比LCS高约10倍,比CTC高25倍。自2011年以来,LCS的搜索量呈上升趋势。与mg相关的最常见搜索主题包括附近的筛查地点(60,850/253,810,24%)和关于程序不适的查询(28,970/253,810,11%)。最常见的lcs相关搜索包括ct特定查询(5380/ 11150,48%)或一般查询(1790/ 11150,16%),人工智能或深度学习的使用(1210/ 11150,11%)和资格标准(1020/ 11150,9%)。对于CTC,最常见的搜索是ct特定查询(1800/5590,32%)或程序细节(1380/5590,25%)。结论:在过去的20年里,MG的谷歌搜索量明显高于LCS或CTC,尽管LCS的搜索量自2011年以来呈上升趋势。公众利益的知识和与基于成像的筛查技术相关的疑问可能有助于指导公众意识的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing Public Interest in Mammography, Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening, and Computed Tomography Colonography Screening Examinations Using Internet Search Data: Cross-Sectional Study.

Background: The noninvasive imaging examinations of mammography (MG), low-dose computed tomography (CT) for lung cancer screening (LCS), and CT colonography (CTC) play important roles in screening for the most common cancer types. Internet search data can be used to gauge public interest in screening techniques, assess common screening-related questions and concerns, and formulate public awareness strategies.

Objective: This study aims to compare historical Google search volumes for MG, LCS, and CTC and to determine the most common search topics.

Methods: Google Trends data were used to quantify relative Google search frequencies for these imaging screening modalities over the last 2 decades. A commercial search engine tracking product (keywordtool.io) was used to assess the content of related Google queries over the year from May 1, 2022, to April 30, 2023, and 2 authors used an iterative process to agree upon a list of thematic categories for these queries. Queries with at least 10 monthly instances were independently assigned to the most appropriate category by the 2 authors, with disagreements resolved by consensus.

Results: The mean 20-year relative search volume for MG was approximately 10-fold higher than for LCS and 25-fold higher than for CTC. Search volumes for LCS have trended upward since 2011. The most common topics of MG-related searches included nearby screening locations (60,850/253,810, 24%) and inquiries about procedural discomfort (28,970/253,810, 11%). Most common LCS-related searches included CT-specific inquiries (5380/11,150, 48%) or general inquiries (1790/11,150, 16%), use of artificial intelligence or deep learning (1210/11,150, 11%), and eligibility criteria (1020/11,150, 9%). For CTC, the most common searches were CT-specific inquiries (1800/5590, 32%) or procedural details (1380/5590, 25%).

Conclusions: Over the past 2 decades, Google search volumes have been significantly higher for MG than for either LCS or CTC, although search volumes for LCS have trended upward since 2011. Knowledge of public interest and queries related to imaging-based screening techniques may help guide public awareness efforts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Cancer
JMIR Cancer ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信