通过手术工作流程管理系统实现肝脏手术的数字化标准化:一项试点随机对照试验。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Fabian Haak, Philip C Müller, Otto Kollmar, Adrian T Billeter, Joël L Lavanchy, Andrea Wiencierz, Beat Peter Müller-Stich, Marco von Strauss Und Torney
{"title":"通过手术工作流程管理系统实现肝脏手术的数字化标准化:一项试点随机对照试验。","authors":"Fabian Haak, Philip C Müller, Otto Kollmar, Adrian T Billeter, Joël L Lavanchy, Andrea Wiencierz, Beat Peter Müller-Stich, Marco von Strauss Und Torney","doi":"10.1007/s00423-025-03634-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Surgical process models (SPM) are simplified representations of operations and their visualization by surgical workflow management systems (SWMS), and offer a solution to enhance communication and workflow.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 1:1 randomized controlled trial was conducted. A SPM consisting of six surgical steps was defined to represent the surgical procedure. The primary outcome, termed \"deviation\" measured the difference between actual and planned surgery duration. Secondary outcomes included stress levels of the operating team and complications. Analyses employed Welch t-tests and linear regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>18 procedures were performed with a SWMS and 18 without. The deviation showed no significant difference between the intervention and control group. Stress levels (TLX score) of the team remained largely unaffected. Duration of operation steps defined by SPM allows a classification of all liver procedures into three phases: The Start Phase (low IQR of operation time), the Main Phase (high IQR of operation time) and the End Phase (low IQR of operation time).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study presents a novel SPM for open liver resections visualized by a SWMS. No significant reduction of deviations from planned operation time was observed with system use. Stress levels of the operation team were not influenced by the SWMS.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"410 1","pages":"96"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11897067/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital standardization in liver surgery through a surgical workflow management system: A pilot randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Fabian Haak, Philip C Müller, Otto Kollmar, Adrian T Billeter, Joël L Lavanchy, Andrea Wiencierz, Beat Peter Müller-Stich, Marco von Strauss Und Torney\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00423-025-03634-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Surgical process models (SPM) are simplified representations of operations and their visualization by surgical workflow management systems (SWMS), and offer a solution to enhance communication and workflow.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 1:1 randomized controlled trial was conducted. A SPM consisting of six surgical steps was defined to represent the surgical procedure. The primary outcome, termed \\\"deviation\\\" measured the difference between actual and planned surgery duration. Secondary outcomes included stress levels of the operating team and complications. Analyses employed Welch t-tests and linear regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>18 procedures were performed with a SWMS and 18 without. The deviation showed no significant difference between the intervention and control group. Stress levels (TLX score) of the team remained largely unaffected. Duration of operation steps defined by SPM allows a classification of all liver procedures into three phases: The Start Phase (low IQR of operation time), the Main Phase (high IQR of operation time) and the End Phase (low IQR of operation time).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study presents a novel SPM for open liver resections visualized by a SWMS. No significant reduction of deviations from planned operation time was observed with system use. Stress levels of the operation team were not influenced by the SWMS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"410 1\",\"pages\":\"96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11897067/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03634-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03634-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

手术流程模型(Surgical process models, SPM)是外科手术流程管理系统(SWMS)对手术过程及其可视化的简化表示,提供了一种增强沟通和工作流程的解决方案。方法:采用1:1随机对照试验。定义了由六个手术步骤组成的SPM来表示手术过程。主要结果,称为“偏差”,测量实际和计划手术时间之间的差异。次要结果包括手术团队的压力水平和并发症。分析采用Welch t检验和线性回归模型。结果:18例采用SWMS, 18例不采用SWMS。干预组与对照组的偏差无显著性差异。团队的压力水平(TLX分数)基本上没有受到影响。SPM定义的手术步骤持续时间允许将所有肝脏手术分为三个阶段:开始阶段(手术时间的低IQR),主要阶段(手术时间的高IQR)和结束阶段(手术时间的低IQR)。结论:本研究提出了一种新的SWMS可视化的开放式肝切除术SPM。系统使用后,未观察到与计划操作时间偏差的显著减少。手术团队的压力水平不受SWMS的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digital standardization in liver surgery through a surgical workflow management system: A pilot randomized controlled trial.

Introduction: Surgical process models (SPM) are simplified representations of operations and their visualization by surgical workflow management systems (SWMS), and offer a solution to enhance communication and workflow.

Methods: A 1:1 randomized controlled trial was conducted. A SPM consisting of six surgical steps was defined to represent the surgical procedure. The primary outcome, termed "deviation" measured the difference between actual and planned surgery duration. Secondary outcomes included stress levels of the operating team and complications. Analyses employed Welch t-tests and linear regression models.

Results: 18 procedures were performed with a SWMS and 18 without. The deviation showed no significant difference between the intervention and control group. Stress levels (TLX score) of the team remained largely unaffected. Duration of operation steps defined by SPM allows a classification of all liver procedures into three phases: The Start Phase (low IQR of operation time), the Main Phase (high IQR of operation time) and the End Phase (low IQR of operation time).

Conclusion: This study presents a novel SPM for open liver resections visualized by a SWMS. No significant reduction of deviations from planned operation time was observed with system use. Stress levels of the operation team were not influenced by the SWMS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信