Sarah E Miller, Meryl M Sperling, Jonathan A Mayo, Stephanie A Leonard, Deirdre J Lyell, Tiffany Herrero, Yair J Blumenfeld
{"title":"妊娠期糖尿病的诊断和治疗:一项全国医师实践调查。","authors":"Sarah E Miller, Meryl M Sperling, Jonathan A Mayo, Stephanie A Leonard, Deirdre J Lyell, Tiffany Herrero, Yair J Blumenfeld","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2024.0918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Aims:</i></b> We aimed to identify changes in United States practice patterns in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) diagnosis and treatment following publication of the 2008 Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes (HAPO) study that supported transition toward a 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A total of 1,030 U.S. obstetric providers were surveyed in 2021 about GDM screening, diagnosis, and treatment, as well as perceptions surrounding preparation for the 1-hour, 50-g glucose loading test (GLT). Data were compared with data from a similar 2003 survey. The study was reviewed by the Institutional Review Board at Stanford University and was determined to be exempt. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 1,030 providers surveyed, 304 (30%) responded. Most respondents continued using the two-step screening method (95.0% versus 95.2% in 2003, <i>p</i> = 0.18). Fewer providers used insulin as a first-line medication (64.1% in 2021 versus 82.3% in 2003, <i>p</i> < 0.001). However, providers practicing for 0-10 years often used insulin as first-line compared with providers practicing for over 10 years (79% versus 55%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Of 2021 respondents, 39.3% believed that fasting before the 1-hour GLT lowers the glucose result, 34.3% believed it increases the result, and 26.4% believed it would have no effect. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Despite data from the HAPO trial, the majority of providers surveyed still use the two-step method for GDM screening. There is wide variability in perceptions and counseling regarding preparation for the 1-hour GLT.</p>","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnosis and Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A National Survey of Physician Practices.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah E Miller, Meryl M Sperling, Jonathan A Mayo, Stephanie A Leonard, Deirdre J Lyell, Tiffany Herrero, Yair J Blumenfeld\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jwh.2024.0918\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Aims:</i></b> We aimed to identify changes in United States practice patterns in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) diagnosis and treatment following publication of the 2008 Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes (HAPO) study that supported transition toward a 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A total of 1,030 U.S. obstetric providers were surveyed in 2021 about GDM screening, diagnosis, and treatment, as well as perceptions surrounding preparation for the 1-hour, 50-g glucose loading test (GLT). Data were compared with data from a similar 2003 survey. The study was reviewed by the Institutional Review Board at Stanford University and was determined to be exempt. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 1,030 providers surveyed, 304 (30%) responded. Most respondents continued using the two-step screening method (95.0% versus 95.2% in 2003, <i>p</i> = 0.18). Fewer providers used insulin as a first-line medication (64.1% in 2021 versus 82.3% in 2003, <i>p</i> < 0.001). However, providers practicing for 0-10 years often used insulin as first-line compared with providers practicing for over 10 years (79% versus 55%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Of 2021 respondents, 39.3% believed that fasting before the 1-hour GLT lowers the glucose result, 34.3% believed it increases the result, and 26.4% believed it would have no effect. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Despite data from the HAPO trial, the majority of providers surveyed still use the two-step method for GDM screening. There is wide variability in perceptions and counseling regarding preparation for the 1-hour GLT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of women's health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of women's health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0918\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0918","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:我们旨在确定在2008年高血糖和不良妊娠结局(HAPO)研究发表后,美国妊娠糖尿病(GDM)诊断和治疗实践模式的变化,该研究支持向2小时口服葡萄糖耐量试验过渡。方法:在2021年,共有1030名美国产科医生接受了关于GDM筛查、诊断和治疗的调查,以及对1小时50克葡萄糖负荷试验(GLT)准备的看法。这些数据与2003年一项类似调查的数据进行了比较。这项研究经过了斯坦福大学机构审查委员会的审查,并被决定豁免。结果:在接受调查的1030家供应商中,304家(30%)做出了回应。大多数受访者继续使用两步筛查法(95.0% vs . 2003年的95.2%,p = 0.18)。使用胰岛素作为一线药物的提供者减少(2021年为64.1%,2003年为82.3%,p < 0.001)。然而,从业0-10年的提供者与从业10年以上的提供者相比,经常使用胰岛素作为一线治疗(79%对55%,p < 0.001)。在2021名受访者中,39.3%的人认为在1小时GLT前禁食会降低血糖结果,34.3%的人认为会提高血糖结果,26.4%的人认为没有效果。结论:尽管有HAPO试验的数据,大多数接受调查的提供者仍然使用两步法进行GDM筛查。关于准备1小时GLT的认知和咨询存在很大的差异。
Diagnosis and Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A National Survey of Physician Practices.
Aims: We aimed to identify changes in United States practice patterns in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) diagnosis and treatment following publication of the 2008 Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes (HAPO) study that supported transition toward a 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test. Methods: A total of 1,030 U.S. obstetric providers were surveyed in 2021 about GDM screening, diagnosis, and treatment, as well as perceptions surrounding preparation for the 1-hour, 50-g glucose loading test (GLT). Data were compared with data from a similar 2003 survey. The study was reviewed by the Institutional Review Board at Stanford University and was determined to be exempt. Results: Of 1,030 providers surveyed, 304 (30%) responded. Most respondents continued using the two-step screening method (95.0% versus 95.2% in 2003, p = 0.18). Fewer providers used insulin as a first-line medication (64.1% in 2021 versus 82.3% in 2003, p < 0.001). However, providers practicing for 0-10 years often used insulin as first-line compared with providers practicing for over 10 years (79% versus 55%, p < 0.001). Of 2021 respondents, 39.3% believed that fasting before the 1-hour GLT lowers the glucose result, 34.3% believed it increases the result, and 26.4% believed it would have no effect. Conclusions: Despite data from the HAPO trial, the majority of providers surveyed still use the two-step method for GDM screening. There is wide variability in perceptions and counseling regarding preparation for the 1-hour GLT.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Women''s Health is the primary source of information for meeting the challenges of providing optimal health care for women throughout their lifespan. The Journal delivers cutting-edge advancements in diagnostic procedures, therapeutic protocols for the management of diseases, and innovative research in gender-based biology that impacts patient care and treatment.
Journal of Women’s Health coverage includes:
-Internal Medicine
Endocrinology-
Cardiology-
Oncology-
Obstetrics/Gynecology-
Urogynecology-
Psychiatry-
Neurology-
Nutrition-
Sex-Based Biology-
Complementary Medicine-
Sports Medicine-
Surgery-
Medical Education-
Public Policy.