阿片类激动剂治疗中的配药问题和纪律措施:一种观点。

Q3 Medicine
Arnab Datta, Siddharth Sarkar
{"title":"阿片类激动剂治疗中的配药问题和纪律措施:一种观点。","authors":"Arnab Datta, Siddharth Sarkar","doi":"10.5055/jom.0922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) poses a significant public health challenge globally, with an estimated 23 million opioid users in India. Opioid Agonist Therapy (OAT) stands as the cornerstone of treatment, offering potential reductions in morbidity, societal burdens, and improvements in patient quality of life. However, OAT coverage remains fairly low in India, with clinical guidelines lacking comprehensive information on implementation pragmatics. This viewpoint delves into the nuanced challenges faced by clinicians in the daily operations of OAT emphasizing disciplinary issues, practical responses, and the broader implications for treatment outcomes and public perception. The treatment provider's response is explored from different aspects like learning theory, attitude, psychodynamic interactions, and ethics. Understanding patient perspectives, including employment demands and perceptions of fairness, is crucial in tailoring responses and optimizing treatment engagement. While disciplinary measures are integral to maintaining treatment sanctity, their effectiveness must be balanced with patient autonomy and harm reduction goals. The discourse surrounding OAT disciplinary measures necessitates a multifaceted approach, integrating evidence-based practices, clinician experiences, patient rights, and administrative considerations to ensure equitable and effective treatment provision.</p>","PeriodicalId":16601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of opioid management","volume":"21 1","pages":"5-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dispensing issues and disciplinary measures during opioid agonist treatment: A viewpoint.\",\"authors\":\"Arnab Datta, Siddharth Sarkar\",\"doi\":\"10.5055/jom.0922\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) poses a significant public health challenge globally, with an estimated 23 million opioid users in India. Opioid Agonist Therapy (OAT) stands as the cornerstone of treatment, offering potential reductions in morbidity, societal burdens, and improvements in patient quality of life. However, OAT coverage remains fairly low in India, with clinical guidelines lacking comprehensive information on implementation pragmatics. This viewpoint delves into the nuanced challenges faced by clinicians in the daily operations of OAT emphasizing disciplinary issues, practical responses, and the broader implications for treatment outcomes and public perception. The treatment provider's response is explored from different aspects like learning theory, attitude, psychodynamic interactions, and ethics. Understanding patient perspectives, including employment demands and perceptions of fairness, is crucial in tailoring responses and optimizing treatment engagement. While disciplinary measures are integral to maintaining treatment sanctity, their effectiveness must be balanced with patient autonomy and harm reduction goals. The discourse surrounding OAT disciplinary measures necessitates a multifaceted approach, integrating evidence-based practices, clinician experiences, patient rights, and administrative considerations to ensure equitable and effective treatment provision.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of opioid management\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"5-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of opioid management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5055/jom.0922\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of opioid management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5055/jom.0922","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)对全球公共卫生构成重大挑战,印度估计有2300万阿片类药物使用者。阿片类激动剂治疗(OAT)是治疗的基石,具有降低发病率、社会负担和改善患者生活质量的潜力。然而,在印度,OAT的覆盖率仍然相当低,临床指南缺乏关于实施实用主义的全面信息。这一观点深入探讨了临床医生在OAT的日常操作中所面临的微妙挑战,强调学科问题、实际反应以及对治疗结果和公众认知的更广泛影响。从学习理论、态度、心理动力互动和伦理等不同方面探讨治疗提供者的反应。了解患者的观点,包括就业需求和对公平的看法,对于调整应对措施和优化治疗参与至关重要。虽然纪律措施是维护治疗神圣性不可或缺的一部分,但其有效性必须与患者自主和减少伤害的目标相平衡。围绕OAT纪律措施的讨论需要采取多方面的方法,将循证实践、临床医生经验、患者权利和行政考虑结合起来,以确保提供公平有效的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dispensing issues and disciplinary measures during opioid agonist treatment: A viewpoint.

Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) poses a significant public health challenge globally, with an estimated 23 million opioid users in India. Opioid Agonist Therapy (OAT) stands as the cornerstone of treatment, offering potential reductions in morbidity, societal burdens, and improvements in patient quality of life. However, OAT coverage remains fairly low in India, with clinical guidelines lacking comprehensive information on implementation pragmatics. This viewpoint delves into the nuanced challenges faced by clinicians in the daily operations of OAT emphasizing disciplinary issues, practical responses, and the broader implications for treatment outcomes and public perception. The treatment provider's response is explored from different aspects like learning theory, attitude, psychodynamic interactions, and ethics. Understanding patient perspectives, including employment demands and perceptions of fairness, is crucial in tailoring responses and optimizing treatment engagement. While disciplinary measures are integral to maintaining treatment sanctity, their effectiveness must be balanced with patient autonomy and harm reduction goals. The discourse surrounding OAT disciplinary measures necessitates a multifaceted approach, integrating evidence-based practices, clinician experiences, patient rights, and administrative considerations to ensure equitable and effective treatment provision.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of opioid management
Journal of opioid management Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Opioid Management deals with all aspects of opioids. From basic science, pre-clinical, clinical, abuse, compliance and addiction medicine, the journal provides and unbiased forum for researchers and clinicians to explore and manage the complexities of opioid prescription.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信