AAPM医学物理实践指南MPPG 17。a:乳房x光检查工作站显示器的质量管理。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Rebecca Milman, Nicholas B. Bevins, Mosa Alhamami, Nathan Busse, Andreea Dohatcu, Katie W. Hulme, Mary Ellen Jafari, Steven M. LaFontaine, Richard D. Nawfel, Jeffrey S. Nelson, Megan K. Russ, Michael Silosky, John M. Wait
{"title":"AAPM医学物理实践指南MPPG 17。a:乳房x光检查工作站显示器的质量管理。","authors":"Rebecca Milman,&nbsp;Nicholas B. Bevins,&nbsp;Mosa Alhamami,&nbsp;Nathan Busse,&nbsp;Andreea Dohatcu,&nbsp;Katie W. Hulme,&nbsp;Mary Ellen Jafari,&nbsp;Steven M. LaFontaine,&nbsp;Richard D. Nawfel,&nbsp;Jeffrey S. Nelson,&nbsp;Megan K. Russ,&nbsp;Michael Silosky,&nbsp;John M. Wait","doi":"10.1002/acm2.14625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA) sets quality standards for displays used to interpret mammography images. With the shift to digital mammography and the widespread use of remote reading workstations (RWS), updated quality management (QM) programs are needed to ensure consistent image presentation and accurate interpretation. This document recommends a QM framework for mammography RWS displays, addressing challenges such as remote environments, regulatory compliance, and evolving technology. The QM model highlights the central role of medical physicists in program design, oversight, and data review. It emphasizes periodic quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) procedures and training for interpreting physicians and staff. A structure for QM for remote RWS, including guidance on environmental conditions, hands-on testing, and remote monitoring solutions, is included. The proposed program balances scientific rigor, cost-effectiveness, and practical implementation, maintaining image quality and safety. By providing a structured approach to RWS display management, this framework supports regulators, accreditation bodies, and healthcare facilities in adapting to advancements in mammography technology while addressing logistical and operational challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.14625","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline MPPG 17.a: Quality management for mammography review workstation displays\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Milman,&nbsp;Nicholas B. Bevins,&nbsp;Mosa Alhamami,&nbsp;Nathan Busse,&nbsp;Andreea Dohatcu,&nbsp;Katie W. Hulme,&nbsp;Mary Ellen Jafari,&nbsp;Steven M. LaFontaine,&nbsp;Richard D. Nawfel,&nbsp;Jeffrey S. Nelson,&nbsp;Megan K. Russ,&nbsp;Michael Silosky,&nbsp;John M. Wait\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acm2.14625\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA) sets quality standards for displays used to interpret mammography images. With the shift to digital mammography and the widespread use of remote reading workstations (RWS), updated quality management (QM) programs are needed to ensure consistent image presentation and accurate interpretation. This document recommends a QM framework for mammography RWS displays, addressing challenges such as remote environments, regulatory compliance, and evolving technology. The QM model highlights the central role of medical physicists in program design, oversight, and data review. It emphasizes periodic quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) procedures and training for interpreting physicians and staff. A structure for QM for remote RWS, including guidance on environmental conditions, hands-on testing, and remote monitoring solutions, is included. The proposed program balances scientific rigor, cost-effectiveness, and practical implementation, maintaining image quality and safety. By providing a structured approach to RWS display management, this framework supports regulators, accreditation bodies, and healthcare facilities in adapting to advancements in mammography technology while addressing logistical and operational challenges.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"26 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.14625\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.14625\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.14625","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

乳房x光检查质量标准法案(MQSA)规定了用于解释乳房x光检查图像的显示器的质量标准。随着数字化乳房x线摄影和远程阅读工作站(RWS)的广泛使用,需要更新的质量管理(QM)程序来确保一致的图像呈现和准确的解释。本文档推荐了乳房x线摄影RWS显示器的质量管理框架,以解决诸如远程环境、法规遵从性和不断发展的技术等挑战。质量管理模型强调了医学物理学家在项目设计、监督和数据审查中的核心作用。它强调定期的质量保证(QA)和质量控制(QC)程序以及对口译医生和工作人员的培训。其中包括远程RWS的质量管理结构,包括关于环境条件、动手测试和远程监控解决方案的指导。提出的方案平衡了科学严谨性、成本效益和实际实施,保持图像质量和安全。通过提供RWS显示管理的结构化方法,该框架支持监管机构、认证机构和医疗机构适应乳房x光检查技术的进步,同时解决后勤和运营方面的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline MPPG 17.a: Quality management for mammography review workstation displays

The Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA) sets quality standards for displays used to interpret mammography images. With the shift to digital mammography and the widespread use of remote reading workstations (RWS), updated quality management (QM) programs are needed to ensure consistent image presentation and accurate interpretation. This document recommends a QM framework for mammography RWS displays, addressing challenges such as remote environments, regulatory compliance, and evolving technology. The QM model highlights the central role of medical physicists in program design, oversight, and data review. It emphasizes periodic quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) procedures and training for interpreting physicians and staff. A structure for QM for remote RWS, including guidance on environmental conditions, hands-on testing, and remote monitoring solutions, is included. The proposed program balances scientific rigor, cost-effectiveness, and practical implementation, maintaining image quality and safety. By providing a structured approach to RWS display management, this framework supports regulators, accreditation bodies, and healthcare facilities in adapting to advancements in mammography technology while addressing logistical and operational challenges.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信