欧洲临床实验室测定和报告总睾酮、性激素结合球蛋白和游离睾酮的调查。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Nick Narinx, Jennifer Afrakoma Nyamaah, Karel David, Vera Sommers, Joeri Walravens, Tom Fiers, Bruno Lapauw, Brigitte Decallonne, Frank Claessens, Katleen Van Uytfanghe, Jaak Billen, Pieter Vermeersch, Dirk Vanderschueren, Leen Antonio
{"title":"欧洲临床实验室测定和报告总睾酮、性激素结合球蛋白和游离睾酮的调查。","authors":"Nick Narinx, Jennifer Afrakoma Nyamaah, Karel David, Vera Sommers, Joeri Walravens, Tom Fiers, Bruno Lapauw, Brigitte Decallonne, Frank Claessens, Katleen Van Uytfanghe, Jaak Billen, Pieter Vermeersch, Dirk Vanderschueren, Leen Antonio","doi":"10.1515/cclm-2024-1237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare clinical laboratory workflows for the assessment of androgens in men, focusing on total testosterone (T), sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) and free T, in clinical laboratories throughout Europe.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An internet-based survey that included questions related to pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical phases of androgen measurements was distributed between December 2022 and December 2023 by clinical laboratory/chemistry and endocrine societies. A total of 124 unique records from clinical laboratories in 27 European countries were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre-analytical requirements for total T are subject to improvement as less than half of clinical laboratories recommended adequate morning sampling time and/or sampling in a fasting state. Total T was predominantly quantified using enzyme-linked immunoassay (IA) on automated platforms, with only one in four centers using mass spectrometry (MS), while SHBG was exclusively measured by IA. Additionally, free T was used by a majority of clinical laboratories, mainly reported as approximation by calculation of free T (cFT) using the Vermeulen formula. Generally, age-stratification was the preferred means of reporting reference ranges for total T, SHBG and cFT. However, considerate variability was observed in reported lower and upper limits, leading to the necessity of interpreting test results against assay-specific reference ranges, thereby hindering comparability of results between clinical laboratories.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our survey highlights significant inter-laboratory variability for the assessment of androgen status in men, implying non-commutability of clinical test results between different centers. In addition, we observed poor adherence to pre-analytical recommendations. These findings advocate for continued harmonization efforts of measurement procedures for SHBG and total/free T.</p>","PeriodicalId":10390,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A survey on measurement and reporting of total testosterone, sex hormone-binding globulin and free testosterone in clinical laboratories in Europe.\",\"authors\":\"Nick Narinx, Jennifer Afrakoma Nyamaah, Karel David, Vera Sommers, Joeri Walravens, Tom Fiers, Bruno Lapauw, Brigitte Decallonne, Frank Claessens, Katleen Van Uytfanghe, Jaak Billen, Pieter Vermeersch, Dirk Vanderschueren, Leen Antonio\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/cclm-2024-1237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare clinical laboratory workflows for the assessment of androgens in men, focusing on total testosterone (T), sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) and free T, in clinical laboratories throughout Europe.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An internet-based survey that included questions related to pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical phases of androgen measurements was distributed between December 2022 and December 2023 by clinical laboratory/chemistry and endocrine societies. A total of 124 unique records from clinical laboratories in 27 European countries were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre-analytical requirements for total T are subject to improvement as less than half of clinical laboratories recommended adequate morning sampling time and/or sampling in a fasting state. Total T was predominantly quantified using enzyme-linked immunoassay (IA) on automated platforms, with only one in four centers using mass spectrometry (MS), while SHBG was exclusively measured by IA. Additionally, free T was used by a majority of clinical laboratories, mainly reported as approximation by calculation of free T (cFT) using the Vermeulen formula. Generally, age-stratification was the preferred means of reporting reference ranges for total T, SHBG and cFT. However, considerate variability was observed in reported lower and upper limits, leading to the necessity of interpreting test results against assay-specific reference ranges, thereby hindering comparability of results between clinical laboratories.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our survey highlights significant inter-laboratory variability for the assessment of androgen status in men, implying non-commutability of clinical test results between different centers. In addition, we observed poor adherence to pre-analytical recommendations. These findings advocate for continued harmonization efforts of measurement procedures for SHBG and total/free T.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2024-1237\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2024-1237","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较欧洲临床实验室评估男性雄激素的工作流程,重点是总睾酮(T)、性激素结合球蛋白(SHBG)和游离睾酮。方法:在2022年12月至2023年12月期间,由临床实验室/化学和内分泌学会进行一项基于互联网的调查,包括与雄激素测量分析前、分析和分析后阶段相关的问题。分析了来自27个欧洲国家临床实验室的124份独特记录。结果:总T的分析前要求有待改进,因为不到一半的临床实验室建议充足的早晨采样时间和/或在禁食状态下采样。总T主要在自动化平台上使用酶联免疫分析法(IA)进行定量,只有四分之一的中心使用质谱法(MS),而SHBG则完全由IA测量。此外,游离T被大多数临床实验室使用,主要报道为使用Vermeulen公式计算游离T (cFT)的近似值。一般来说,年龄分层是报告总T、SHBG和cFT参考范围的首选方法。然而,在报告的下限和上限中观察到考虑到的可变性,导致需要根据检测特定参考范围解释检测结果,从而阻碍了临床实验室之间结果的可比性。结论:我们的调查突出了男性雄激素状态评估的显著实验室间差异,这意味着不同中心的临床测试结果不可互换。此外,我们观察到对分析前建议的依从性较差。这些发现提倡继续协调SHBG和总/游离T的测量程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A survey on measurement and reporting of total testosterone, sex hormone-binding globulin and free testosterone in clinical laboratories in Europe.

Objectives: To compare clinical laboratory workflows for the assessment of androgens in men, focusing on total testosterone (T), sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) and free T, in clinical laboratories throughout Europe.

Methods: An internet-based survey that included questions related to pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical phases of androgen measurements was distributed between December 2022 and December 2023 by clinical laboratory/chemistry and endocrine societies. A total of 124 unique records from clinical laboratories in 27 European countries were analyzed.

Results: Pre-analytical requirements for total T are subject to improvement as less than half of clinical laboratories recommended adequate morning sampling time and/or sampling in a fasting state. Total T was predominantly quantified using enzyme-linked immunoassay (IA) on automated platforms, with only one in four centers using mass spectrometry (MS), while SHBG was exclusively measured by IA. Additionally, free T was used by a majority of clinical laboratories, mainly reported as approximation by calculation of free T (cFT) using the Vermeulen formula. Generally, age-stratification was the preferred means of reporting reference ranges for total T, SHBG and cFT. However, considerate variability was observed in reported lower and upper limits, leading to the necessity of interpreting test results against assay-specific reference ranges, thereby hindering comparability of results between clinical laboratories.

Conclusions: Our survey highlights significant inter-laboratory variability for the assessment of androgen status in men, implying non-commutability of clinical test results between different centers. In addition, we observed poor adherence to pre-analytical recommendations. These findings advocate for continued harmonization efforts of measurement procedures for SHBG and total/free T.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
16.20%
发文量
306
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) publishes articles on novel teaching and training methods applicable to laboratory medicine. CCLM welcomes contributions on the progress in fundamental and applied research and cutting-edge clinical laboratory medicine. It is one of the leading journals in the field, with an impact factor over 3. CCLM is issued monthly, and it is published in print and electronically. CCLM is the official journal of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and publishes regularly EFLM recommendations and news. CCLM is the official journal of the National Societies from Austria (ÖGLMKC); Belgium (RBSLM); Germany (DGKL); Hungary (MLDT); Ireland (ACBI); Italy (SIBioC); Portugal (SPML); and Slovenia (SZKK); and it is affiliated to AACB (Australia) and SFBC (France). Topics: - clinical biochemistry - clinical genomics and molecular biology - clinical haematology and coagulation - clinical immunology and autoimmunity - clinical microbiology - drug monitoring and analysis - evaluation of diagnostic biomarkers - disease-oriented topics (cardiovascular disease, cancer diagnostics, diabetes) - new reagents, instrumentation and technologies - new methodologies - reference materials and methods - reference values and decision limits - quality and safety in laboratory medicine - translational laboratory medicine - clinical metrology Follow @cclm_degruyter on Twitter!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信