“当全球卫生实现全球目标时”:评估10个非洲和亚洲国家抗菌素耐药性与可持续发展政策之间的一致性。

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Luong Nguyen Thanh, Didier Wernli, Mats Målqvist, Peter Søgaard Jørgensen
{"title":"“当全球卫生实现全球目标时”:评估10个非洲和亚洲国家抗菌素耐药性与可持续发展政策之间的一致性。","authors":"Luong Nguyen Thanh, Didier Wernli, Mats Målqvist, Peter Søgaard Jørgensen","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sustainable development goals (SDGs) may play a pivotal role in mitigating antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This study examines how countries can integrate AMR mitigation with sustainable development strategies, providing evidence on the prioritisation of AMR-related efforts within both agendas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comparative analysis of the international global action plan (GAP) and national action plan (NAP) on AMR and SDGs across 10 countries in Africa and Asia. We employed content analysis to map actions to AMR drivers, descriptive statistics to summarise the coverage and focus of the actions and inferential statistics to explore factors associated with the level of policy alignment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings highlight gaps in the current AMR policy landscape, where drivers are at risk of being redundantly addressed, narrowly focused or entirely overlooked. At the international level, over 50% of AMR drivers are addressed by both frameworks, but national-level overlap is lower (10.5%-47.4%), with Asian countries showing stronger alignment than African countries. Asian countries show a higher proportion of shared drivers than African countries. A considerable proportion of drivers are addressed solely by AMR-NAPs (23.7%-60.5%) or SDG-NAPs (13.2%-31.6%), raising concerns that actions may benefit either sustainable development or AMR at the expense of the other. Finally, 10.5%-26.3% of drivers, mostly distal, are not acknowledged by either framework, highlighting potential policy blind spots.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Agenda 2030 includes ambitious and cross-cutting goals with GAP-AMR, therefore it can facilitate intersectoral collaboration in addressing AMR. The effective implementation of both agendas will depend on national governments' capacity to ensure that efforts in combating AMR also contribute to sustainable development.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11904336/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'When global health meets global goals': assessing the alignment between antimicrobial resistance and sustainable development policies in 10 African and Asian countries.\",\"authors\":\"Luong Nguyen Thanh, Didier Wernli, Mats Målqvist, Peter Søgaard Jørgensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017837\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sustainable development goals (SDGs) may play a pivotal role in mitigating antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This study examines how countries can integrate AMR mitigation with sustainable development strategies, providing evidence on the prioritisation of AMR-related efforts within both agendas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comparative analysis of the international global action plan (GAP) and national action plan (NAP) on AMR and SDGs across 10 countries in Africa and Asia. We employed content analysis to map actions to AMR drivers, descriptive statistics to summarise the coverage and focus of the actions and inferential statistics to explore factors associated with the level of policy alignment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings highlight gaps in the current AMR policy landscape, where drivers are at risk of being redundantly addressed, narrowly focused or entirely overlooked. At the international level, over 50% of AMR drivers are addressed by both frameworks, but national-level overlap is lower (10.5%-47.4%), with Asian countries showing stronger alignment than African countries. Asian countries show a higher proportion of shared drivers than African countries. A considerable proportion of drivers are addressed solely by AMR-NAPs (23.7%-60.5%) or SDG-NAPs (13.2%-31.6%), raising concerns that actions may benefit either sustainable development or AMR at the expense of the other. Finally, 10.5%-26.3% of drivers, mostly distal, are not acknowledged by either framework, highlighting potential policy blind spots.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Agenda 2030 includes ambitious and cross-cutting goals with GAP-AMR, therefore it can facilitate intersectoral collaboration in addressing AMR. The effective implementation of both agendas will depend on national governments' capacity to ensure that efforts in combating AMR also contribute to sustainable development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11904336/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017837\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017837","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:可持续发展目标(SDGs)可能在减轻抗菌素耐药性(AMR)方面发挥关键作用。本研究考察了各国如何将抗菌素耐药性缓解与可持续发展战略结合起来,为在两个议程中确定抗菌素耐药性相关工作的优先次序提供了证据。方法:我们对非洲和亚洲10个国家的抗微生物药物耐药性和可持续发展目标国际全球行动计划(GAP)和国家行动计划(NAP)进行了比较分析。我们使用内容分析来将行动映射到AMR驱动因素,描述性统计来总结行动的覆盖范围和重点,推断统计来探索与政策一致性水平相关的因素。结果:我们的研究结果突出了当前AMR政策格局中的差距,其中司机面临着被冗余处理、狭隘关注或完全忽视的风险。在国际层面,两个框架都解决了50%以上的抗生素耐药性驱动因素,但国家层面的重叠程度较低(10.5%-47.4%),亚洲国家比非洲国家表现出更强的一致性。亚洲国家的共享司机比例高于非洲国家。相当大比例的驱动因素仅由抗微生物药物耐药性行动计划(23.7%-60.5%)或可持续发展目标行动计划(13.2%-31.6%)解决,这引起了人们的担忧,即行动可能有利于可持续发展或以牺牲另一方为代价促进抗微生物药物耐药性。最后,10.5%-26.3%的司机(大多是偏远地区的司机)没有得到任何一个框架的认可,这凸显了潜在的政策盲点。结论:《2030年议程》包含了雄心勃勃的跨领域目标,其中涉及抗生素耐药性的差距,因此可以促进跨部门合作解决抗生素耐药性问题。这两个议程的有效实施将取决于各国政府是否有能力确保抗击抗生素耐药性的努力也有助于可持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
'When global health meets global goals': assessing the alignment between antimicrobial resistance and sustainable development policies in 10 African and Asian countries.

Background: Sustainable development goals (SDGs) may play a pivotal role in mitigating antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This study examines how countries can integrate AMR mitigation with sustainable development strategies, providing evidence on the prioritisation of AMR-related efforts within both agendas.

Methods: We conducted a comparative analysis of the international global action plan (GAP) and national action plan (NAP) on AMR and SDGs across 10 countries in Africa and Asia. We employed content analysis to map actions to AMR drivers, descriptive statistics to summarise the coverage and focus of the actions and inferential statistics to explore factors associated with the level of policy alignment.

Results: Our findings highlight gaps in the current AMR policy landscape, where drivers are at risk of being redundantly addressed, narrowly focused or entirely overlooked. At the international level, over 50% of AMR drivers are addressed by both frameworks, but national-level overlap is lower (10.5%-47.4%), with Asian countries showing stronger alignment than African countries. Asian countries show a higher proportion of shared drivers than African countries. A considerable proportion of drivers are addressed solely by AMR-NAPs (23.7%-60.5%) or SDG-NAPs (13.2%-31.6%), raising concerns that actions may benefit either sustainable development or AMR at the expense of the other. Finally, 10.5%-26.3% of drivers, mostly distal, are not acknowledged by either framework, highlighting potential policy blind spots.

Conclusions: The Agenda 2030 includes ambitious and cross-cutting goals with GAP-AMR, therefore it can facilitate intersectoral collaboration in addressing AMR. The effective implementation of both agendas will depend on national governments' capacity to ensure that efforts in combating AMR also contribute to sustainable development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信