铜绿假单胞菌对经典和新型β-内酰胺的第一步抗性机制的突变预防浓度、表型和基因组分析。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Pub Date : 2025-04-02 Epub Date: 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1128/aac.01942-24
Miquel Àngel Sastre-Femenia, Maria Antonia Gomis-Font, Antonio Oliver
{"title":"铜绿假单胞菌对经典和新型β-内酰胺的第一步抗性机制的突变预防浓度、表型和基因组分析。","authors":"Miquel Àngel Sastre-Femenia, Maria Antonia Gomis-Font, Antonio Oliver","doi":"10.1128/aac.01942-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A growing number of novel antipseudomonal β-lactams have been introduced in recent years, but the emergence of resistance is still a major concern in the treatment of <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> infections. Here, we compared the mutant prevention concentrations (MPCs) and the nature of first-step resistant mutants to classical and novel β-lactams in <i>P. aeruginosa</i>. MPCs were determined in duplicate experiments for ceftazidime, ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, imipenem, imipenem/relebactam, meropenem, meropenem/vaborbactam, aztreonam, aztreonam/avibactam, and cefiderocol in PAO1, PAOMS (Δ<i>mutS</i>), and three extensively drug-resistant (XDR) clinical strains belonging to high-risk clones ST111, ST175, and ST235. Four mutants per strain and antibiotic, obtained from the highest concentration showing growth, were characterized through the determination of the susceptibility profiles and whole genome sequencing. Imipenem/relebactam presented the lowest MPC values, followed by ceftolozane/tazobactam. Overall, the MICs of the mutants were consistent with the antibiotic selection concentration, except for cefiderocol, which were much lower. MPCs were lower for ceftazidime/avibactam and imipenem/relebactam than those of the corresponding β-lactam alone. In contrast, MPCs of meropenem ± vaborbactam and aztreonam ± avibactam were identical in most strains. Ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam derivatives presented mutations in <i>ampC</i>, <i>galU</i>, <i>cpxRS,</i> and/or in <i>bla<sub>OXA-2</sub></i> when present in the parent strain (ST235). Cefiderocol mutants were mainly defective in iron-uptake systems, particularly PiuA/DC. All carbapenems had oprD as the first-step mechanism. Imipenem/relebactam, meropenem ± vaborbactam, and aztreonam ± avibactam selected mutations frequently included efflux pumps and regulators. Imipenem ± relebactam also selected <i>aroB</i> mutations. This work first describes the MPCs and first-step resistance mechanisms for classical and novel β-lactams in <i>P. aeruginosa</i>. The identified shared and differential resistance development patterns between the available classical and novel β-lactams should be helpful to guide treatment strategies for XDR <i>P. aeruginosa</i> infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":8152,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"e0194224"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11963537/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mutant prevention concentrations and phenotypic and genomic profiling of first-step resistance mechanisms to classical and novel β-lactams in <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>.\",\"authors\":\"Miquel Àngel Sastre-Femenia, Maria Antonia Gomis-Font, Antonio Oliver\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/aac.01942-24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A growing number of novel antipseudomonal β-lactams have been introduced in recent years, but the emergence of resistance is still a major concern in the treatment of <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> infections. Here, we compared the mutant prevention concentrations (MPCs) and the nature of first-step resistant mutants to classical and novel β-lactams in <i>P. aeruginosa</i>. MPCs were determined in duplicate experiments for ceftazidime, ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, imipenem, imipenem/relebactam, meropenem, meropenem/vaborbactam, aztreonam, aztreonam/avibactam, and cefiderocol in PAO1, PAOMS (Δ<i>mutS</i>), and three extensively drug-resistant (XDR) clinical strains belonging to high-risk clones ST111, ST175, and ST235. Four mutants per strain and antibiotic, obtained from the highest concentration showing growth, were characterized through the determination of the susceptibility profiles and whole genome sequencing. Imipenem/relebactam presented the lowest MPC values, followed by ceftolozane/tazobactam. Overall, the MICs of the mutants were consistent with the antibiotic selection concentration, except for cefiderocol, which were much lower. MPCs were lower for ceftazidime/avibactam and imipenem/relebactam than those of the corresponding β-lactam alone. In contrast, MPCs of meropenem ± vaborbactam and aztreonam ± avibactam were identical in most strains. Ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam derivatives presented mutations in <i>ampC</i>, <i>galU</i>, <i>cpxRS,</i> and/or in <i>bla<sub>OXA-2</sub></i> when present in the parent strain (ST235). Cefiderocol mutants were mainly defective in iron-uptake systems, particularly PiuA/DC. All carbapenems had oprD as the first-step mechanism. Imipenem/relebactam, meropenem ± vaborbactam, and aztreonam ± avibactam selected mutations frequently included efflux pumps and regulators. Imipenem ± relebactam also selected <i>aroB</i> mutations. This work first describes the MPCs and first-step resistance mechanisms for classical and novel β-lactams in <i>P. aeruginosa</i>. The identified shared and differential resistance development patterns between the available classical and novel β-lactams should be helpful to guide treatment strategies for XDR <i>P. aeruginosa</i> infections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e0194224\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11963537/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01942-24\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01942-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,越来越多的新型抗假单胞菌β-内酰胺类药物被引入,但耐药性的出现仍然是铜绿假单胞菌感染治疗中的一个主要问题。在这里,我们比较了铜绿假单胞菌中经典和新型β-内酰胺的突变体预防浓度(MPCs)和第一步抗性突变体的性质。通过重复实验测定头孢他啶、头孢他啶/阿维巴坦、头孢甲苯/他唑巴坦、亚胺培南、亚胺培南/瑞巴坦、美罗培南、美罗培南/瓦波巴坦、氨曲南、氨曲南/阿维巴坦和头孢地罗在PAO1、PAOMS (ΔmutS)和3株属于高风险克隆ST111、ST175和ST235的广泛耐药(XDR)临床菌株中的MPCs。每个菌株和抗生素4个突变体,从最高浓度获得生长,通过测定敏感性谱和全基因组测序进行表征。亚胺培南/瑞巴坦的MPC值最低,其次是头孢唑烷/他唑巴坦。总体而言,突变体的mic与抗生素选择浓度一致,但头孢地罗的mic要低得多。头孢他啶/阿维巴坦和亚胺培南/瑞巴坦的MPCs低于单独使用β-内酰胺的MPCs。而美罗培南±瓦波巴坦和阿曲南±阿维巴坦的MPCs在大多数菌株中相同。当存在于亲本菌株(ST235)时,头孢噻嗪/他唑巴坦和头孢噻啶/阿维巴坦衍生物在ampC、galU、cpxRS和/或blaOXA-2中出现突变。头孢地罗突变体主要存在铁摄取系统缺陷,尤其是PiuA/DC。所有碳青霉烯类均以oprD为第一步机制。亚胺培南/乐巴坦、美罗培南±瓦波巴坦和阿曲南±阿维巴坦选择的突变通常包括外排泵和调节因子。亚胺培南±瑞巴坦也可选择aroB突变。本文首先介绍了铜绿假单胞菌经典β-内酰胺和新型β-内酰胺的MPCs和第一步耐药机制。已确定的经典β-内酰胺和新型β-内酰胺之间的共同和不同耐药发展模式应有助于指导广泛耐药铜绿假单胞菌感染的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mutant prevention concentrations and phenotypic and genomic profiling of first-step resistance mechanisms to classical and novel β-lactams in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

A growing number of novel antipseudomonal β-lactams have been introduced in recent years, but the emergence of resistance is still a major concern in the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Here, we compared the mutant prevention concentrations (MPCs) and the nature of first-step resistant mutants to classical and novel β-lactams in P. aeruginosa. MPCs were determined in duplicate experiments for ceftazidime, ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, imipenem, imipenem/relebactam, meropenem, meropenem/vaborbactam, aztreonam, aztreonam/avibactam, and cefiderocol in PAO1, PAOMS (ΔmutS), and three extensively drug-resistant (XDR) clinical strains belonging to high-risk clones ST111, ST175, and ST235. Four mutants per strain and antibiotic, obtained from the highest concentration showing growth, were characterized through the determination of the susceptibility profiles and whole genome sequencing. Imipenem/relebactam presented the lowest MPC values, followed by ceftolozane/tazobactam. Overall, the MICs of the mutants were consistent with the antibiotic selection concentration, except for cefiderocol, which were much lower. MPCs were lower for ceftazidime/avibactam and imipenem/relebactam than those of the corresponding β-lactam alone. In contrast, MPCs of meropenem ± vaborbactam and aztreonam ± avibactam were identical in most strains. Ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam derivatives presented mutations in ampC, galU, cpxRS, and/or in blaOXA-2 when present in the parent strain (ST235). Cefiderocol mutants were mainly defective in iron-uptake systems, particularly PiuA/DC. All carbapenems had oprD as the first-step mechanism. Imipenem/relebactam, meropenem ± vaborbactam, and aztreonam ± avibactam selected mutations frequently included efflux pumps and regulators. Imipenem ± relebactam also selected aroB mutations. This work first describes the MPCs and first-step resistance mechanisms for classical and novel β-lactams in P. aeruginosa. The identified shared and differential resistance development patterns between the available classical and novel β-lactams should be helpful to guide treatment strategies for XDR P. aeruginosa infections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
8.20%
发文量
762
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (AAC) features interdisciplinary studies that build our understanding of the underlying mechanisms and therapeutic applications of antimicrobial and antiparasitic agents and chemotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信