胰十二指肠切除术中机器人胃肠造口手术表现的视频评估:评估学习曲线和胃排空延迟的风险。

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Maurice J W Zwart, Bram L J van den Broek, Diederik S J Paijens, Sabrina L M Zwetsloot, Annalisa Comandatore, Olivier R Busch, T C Khé Tran, Misha D Luyer, Jennifer Schreinemakers, Jan H Wijsman, George P van der Schelling, Ignace H J T de Hingh, J Sven D Mieog, Bert A Bonsing, Kosei Takagi, Roeland F de Wilde, Luca Morelli, Herbert J Zeh, Amer H Zureikat, Melissa E Hogg, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Marc G Besselink
{"title":"胰十二指肠切除术中机器人胃肠造口手术表现的视频评估:评估学习曲线和胃排空延迟的风险。","authors":"Maurice J W Zwart, Bram L J van den Broek, Diederik S J Paijens, Sabrina L M Zwetsloot, Annalisa Comandatore, Olivier R Busch, T C Khé Tran, Misha D Luyer, Jennifer Schreinemakers, Jan H Wijsman, George P van der Schelling, Ignace H J T de Hingh, J Sven D Mieog, Bert A Bonsing, Kosei Takagi, Roeland F de Wilde, Luca Morelli, Herbert J Zeh, Amer H Zureikat, Melissa E Hogg, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Marc G Besselink","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to identify learning curves for robotic gastro-enterostomy (RGE) during RPD and the predictive value of the objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) score for DGE according to the Birkmeyer et al and UPMC method.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>In some series, robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) has been associated with increased risk of delayed gastric emptying (DGE). It is unclear whether this is attributable to learning curve. Improved surgical performance and experience has not yet been linked to a decrease in delayed gastric emptying in RPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Post-hoc study of the prospective multicenter (LAELAPS-3) training program including videos of RGE during RPD. Surgical performance was scored with OSATS by two blinded graders. The main outcomes are the combined OSATS scores of two blinded graders over time (learning curve). Secondary outcome is the correlation between OSATS scores and clinically relevant DGE (grade B/C).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Videos from 192 RGE anastomoses were included. DGE occurred in 42/192 (21.9%) patients. Mean OSATS score was 22.4 (SD±5.1) and predicted DGE (AUC 0.668, P<0.001). The predictive OSATS elements for DGE were gentleness (AUC 0.719, P<0.001), instrument handling (AUC 0.595 P=0.043), tissue exposure (AUC 0.625, P=0.009), and summary score (AUC 0.665, P<0.001). An OSATS score >25 was associated with a 59.9% reduced relative risk of grade B/C DGE (11.3% (8/71) vs 28.1% (34/121); OR 0.325, P=0.006). CUSUM analysis of RGE-OSATS identified a turning point at 34 procedures (27.5% (36/140) before vs 11.5% (6/52) after; OR 0.156, P=0.035. On multivariable analysis for grade B/C DGE, OSATS ≤25 remained an independent risk factor (OR 2.907, P=0.028).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Better surgical performance during gastro-enteric anastomosis in RPD, as assessed by OSATS, is associated with a reduced rate of grade B/C DGE. OSATS could serve as a tool for competency-based training programs and quality-controlled implementation of RPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Video-assessment of Surgical Performance in Robotic Gastro-enterostomy During Pancreatoduodenectomy: Evaluating the Learning Curve and Risk of Delayed Gastric Emptying.\",\"authors\":\"Maurice J W Zwart, Bram L J van den Broek, Diederik S J Paijens, Sabrina L M Zwetsloot, Annalisa Comandatore, Olivier R Busch, T C Khé Tran, Misha D Luyer, Jennifer Schreinemakers, Jan H Wijsman, George P van der Schelling, Ignace H J T de Hingh, J Sven D Mieog, Bert A Bonsing, Kosei Takagi, Roeland F de Wilde, Luca Morelli, Herbert J Zeh, Amer H Zureikat, Melissa E Hogg, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Marc G Besselink\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006692\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to identify learning curves for robotic gastro-enterostomy (RGE) during RPD and the predictive value of the objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) score for DGE according to the Birkmeyer et al and UPMC method.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>In some series, robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) has been associated with increased risk of delayed gastric emptying (DGE). It is unclear whether this is attributable to learning curve. Improved surgical performance and experience has not yet been linked to a decrease in delayed gastric emptying in RPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Post-hoc study of the prospective multicenter (LAELAPS-3) training program including videos of RGE during RPD. Surgical performance was scored with OSATS by two blinded graders. The main outcomes are the combined OSATS scores of two blinded graders over time (learning curve). Secondary outcome is the correlation between OSATS scores and clinically relevant DGE (grade B/C).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Videos from 192 RGE anastomoses were included. DGE occurred in 42/192 (21.9%) patients. Mean OSATS score was 22.4 (SD±5.1) and predicted DGE (AUC 0.668, P<0.001). The predictive OSATS elements for DGE were gentleness (AUC 0.719, P<0.001), instrument handling (AUC 0.595 P=0.043), tissue exposure (AUC 0.625, P=0.009), and summary score (AUC 0.665, P<0.001). An OSATS score >25 was associated with a 59.9% reduced relative risk of grade B/C DGE (11.3% (8/71) vs 28.1% (34/121); OR 0.325, P=0.006). CUSUM analysis of RGE-OSATS identified a turning point at 34 procedures (27.5% (36/140) before vs 11.5% (6/52) after; OR 0.156, P=0.035. On multivariable analysis for grade B/C DGE, OSATS ≤25 remained an independent risk factor (OR 2.907, P=0.028).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Better surgical performance during gastro-enteric anastomosis in RPD, as assessed by OSATS, is associated with a reduced rate of grade B/C DGE. OSATS could serve as a tool for competency-based training programs and quality-controlled implementation of RPD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006692\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006692","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是根据Birkmeyer等和UPMC方法确定RPD期间机器人胃肠造口术(RGE)的学习曲线和DGE的客观结构化技术技能评估(OSATS)评分的预测价值。背景资料总结:在一些研究中,机器人胰十二指肠切除术(RPD)与胃排空延迟(DGE)的风险增加有关。目前尚不清楚这是否归因于学习曲线。改进的手术表现和经验尚未与RPD患者胃排空延迟的减少联系起来。方法:对前瞻性多中心(LAELAPS-3)培训计划进行事后研究,包括RGE在RPD期间的视频。手术表现由两名盲法评分者用OSATS评分。主要结果是两个盲法评分者的OSATS分数随时间的总和(学习曲线)。次要结局是OSATS评分与临床相关DGE (B/C级)之间的相关性。结果:纳入192例RGE吻合口视频。192例患者中有42例(21.9%)发生DGE。平均OSATS评分为22.4 (SD±5.1),预测DGE (AUC 0.668), P25与B/C级DGE相对风险降低59.9%相关(11.3% (8/71)vs 28.1% (34/121);或0.325,p =0.006)。RGE-OSATS的CUSUM分析在34例手术中发现了转折点(术前27.5%(36/140),术后11.5% (6/52);或0.156,p =0.035。在B/C级DGE的多变量分析中,OSATS≤25仍然是独立的危险因素(OR 2.907, P=0.028)。结论:根据OSATS评估,RPD患者在胃-肠吻合术中手术表现较好,与B/C级DGE发生率降低相关。OSATS可以作为基于能力的培训方案和在质量控制下实施RPD的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Video-assessment of Surgical Performance in Robotic Gastro-enterostomy During Pancreatoduodenectomy: Evaluating the Learning Curve and Risk of Delayed Gastric Emptying.

Objective: The aim of this study is to identify learning curves for robotic gastro-enterostomy (RGE) during RPD and the predictive value of the objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) score for DGE according to the Birkmeyer et al and UPMC method.

Summary of background data: In some series, robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) has been associated with increased risk of delayed gastric emptying (DGE). It is unclear whether this is attributable to learning curve. Improved surgical performance and experience has not yet been linked to a decrease in delayed gastric emptying in RPD.

Methods: Post-hoc study of the prospective multicenter (LAELAPS-3) training program including videos of RGE during RPD. Surgical performance was scored with OSATS by two blinded graders. The main outcomes are the combined OSATS scores of two blinded graders over time (learning curve). Secondary outcome is the correlation between OSATS scores and clinically relevant DGE (grade B/C).

Results: Videos from 192 RGE anastomoses were included. DGE occurred in 42/192 (21.9%) patients. Mean OSATS score was 22.4 (SD±5.1) and predicted DGE (AUC 0.668, P<0.001). The predictive OSATS elements for DGE were gentleness (AUC 0.719, P<0.001), instrument handling (AUC 0.595 P=0.043), tissue exposure (AUC 0.625, P=0.009), and summary score (AUC 0.665, P<0.001). An OSATS score >25 was associated with a 59.9% reduced relative risk of grade B/C DGE (11.3% (8/71) vs 28.1% (34/121); OR 0.325, P=0.006). CUSUM analysis of RGE-OSATS identified a turning point at 34 procedures (27.5% (36/140) before vs 11.5% (6/52) after; OR 0.156, P=0.035. On multivariable analysis for grade B/C DGE, OSATS ≤25 remained an independent risk factor (OR 2.907, P=0.028).

Conclusions: Better surgical performance during gastro-enteric anastomosis in RPD, as assessed by OSATS, is associated with a reduced rate of grade B/C DGE. OSATS could serve as a tool for competency-based training programs and quality-controlled implementation of RPD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信