急性术后癫痫发作能预测癫痫手术结果吗?范围审查

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sebastiaan E. A. van Maanen, Maeike J. M. Zijlmans, Pieter van Eijsden, Sandra M. A. van der Salm
{"title":"急性术后癫痫发作能预测癫痫手术结果吗?范围审查","authors":"Sebastiaan E. A. van Maanen,&nbsp;Maeike J. M. Zijlmans,&nbsp;Pieter van Eijsden,&nbsp;Sandra M. A. van der Salm","doi":"10.1007/s00701-025-06486-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Acute postoperative seizures (APOS) are common phenomena following resective epilepsy surgery and can be categorized as running-down (RDS) or running-up seizures (RUS). This differentiation is made retrospectively, considering their classification is based on seizure recurrence. However, early differentiation of RDS from RUS may prevent unnecessary escalation of anti-seizure medication or reoperation. This review provides an overview of the available literature on variables influencing the evolution to RDS/RUS in patients exhibiting acute or early postoperative seizures.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A database search was performed addressing studies related to the running-down phenomenon and postoperative seizures in PubMed and Embase. Eligibility required a clear definition of acute or early postoperative seizures. Studies concerning any type of epilepsy surgery or pathology were accepted, excluding those related to high-grade malignancies.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The search yielded a total of <i>n</i> = 1,690 records. We included <i>n</i> = 21 studies with a total of <i>n</i> = 1,496 patients, which examined variables associated with long-term seizure outcome. Interictal epileptiform discharge presence/laterality, epileptogenic zone size, APOS frequency, and history of generalized tonic–clonic seizures, head trauma, or encephalitis were associated with seizure outcome. Ictal expression and timing of seizure recurrence appeared less relevant. However, these associations are uncertain due to conflicting results between studies, likely due to small sample sizes, a limited reporting of secondary variables, and heterogeneity in study population and methodology.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The variability in clinical outcome following APOS highlights the need for a refined classification of postoperative seizures. Future research should focus on constructing and validating a multifactorial model integrating EEG-derived variables, APOS frequency, and medical history to more accurately predict long-term seizure outcome following resective epilepsy surgery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7370,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neurochirurgica","volume":"167 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00701-025-06486-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do acute postoperative seizures predict epilepsy surgery outcome? a scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Sebastiaan E. A. van Maanen,&nbsp;Maeike J. M. Zijlmans,&nbsp;Pieter van Eijsden,&nbsp;Sandra M. A. van der Salm\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00701-025-06486-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Acute postoperative seizures (APOS) are common phenomena following resective epilepsy surgery and can be categorized as running-down (RDS) or running-up seizures (RUS). This differentiation is made retrospectively, considering their classification is based on seizure recurrence. However, early differentiation of RDS from RUS may prevent unnecessary escalation of anti-seizure medication or reoperation. This review provides an overview of the available literature on variables influencing the evolution to RDS/RUS in patients exhibiting acute or early postoperative seizures.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A database search was performed addressing studies related to the running-down phenomenon and postoperative seizures in PubMed and Embase. Eligibility required a clear definition of acute or early postoperative seizures. Studies concerning any type of epilepsy surgery or pathology were accepted, excluding those related to high-grade malignancies.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The search yielded a total of <i>n</i> = 1,690 records. We included <i>n</i> = 21 studies with a total of <i>n</i> = 1,496 patients, which examined variables associated with long-term seizure outcome. Interictal epileptiform discharge presence/laterality, epileptogenic zone size, APOS frequency, and history of generalized tonic–clonic seizures, head trauma, or encephalitis were associated with seizure outcome. Ictal expression and timing of seizure recurrence appeared less relevant. However, these associations are uncertain due to conflicting results between studies, likely due to small sample sizes, a limited reporting of secondary variables, and heterogeneity in study population and methodology.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The variability in clinical outcome following APOS highlights the need for a refined classification of postoperative seizures. Future research should focus on constructing and validating a multifactorial model integrating EEG-derived variables, APOS frequency, and medical history to more accurately predict long-term seizure outcome following resective epilepsy surgery.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Neurochirurgica\",\"volume\":\"167 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00701-025-06486-8.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Neurochirurgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00701-025-06486-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neurochirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00701-025-06486-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

急性术后癫痫发作(APOS)是切除性癫痫手术后的常见现象,可分为跑下(RDS)和跑起(RUS)两种。这种区分是回顾性的,考虑到它们的分类是基于癫痫复发。然而,早期区分RDS和RUS可以防止不必要的抗癫痫药物升级或再次手术。本综述概述了影响急性或术后早期癫痫发作患者向RDS/RUS演变的变量的现有文献。方法检索PubMed和Embase数据库中与跑速现象和术后癫痫发作相关的研究。资格要求明确定义急性或术后早期癫痫发作。接受任何类型的癫痫手术或病理研究,不包括与高度恶性肿瘤相关的研究。结果共检索到n = 1,690条记录。我们纳入了n = 21项研究,共n = 1496例患者,这些研究检查了与长期癫痫发作结果相关的变量。发作间期癫痫样放电存在/偏侧性、癫痫区大小、APOS频率、全身性强直-阵挛性发作史、头部创伤或脑炎与发作结果相关。Ictal表达与癫痫复发时间相关性较低。然而,这些关联是不确定的,因为研究之间的结果相互矛盾,可能是由于样本量小,次要变量的报告有限,以及研究人群和方法的异质性。结论APOS术后临床结果的可变性强调了对术后癫痫发作进行精确分类的必要性。未来的研究应侧重于构建和验证多因素模型,整合脑电图衍生变量、APOS频率和病史,以更准确地预测切除性癫痫手术后的长期癫痫发作结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do acute postoperative seizures predict epilepsy surgery outcome? a scoping review

Background

Acute postoperative seizures (APOS) are common phenomena following resective epilepsy surgery and can be categorized as running-down (RDS) or running-up seizures (RUS). This differentiation is made retrospectively, considering their classification is based on seizure recurrence. However, early differentiation of RDS from RUS may prevent unnecessary escalation of anti-seizure medication or reoperation. This review provides an overview of the available literature on variables influencing the evolution to RDS/RUS in patients exhibiting acute or early postoperative seizures.

Methods

A database search was performed addressing studies related to the running-down phenomenon and postoperative seizures in PubMed and Embase. Eligibility required a clear definition of acute or early postoperative seizures. Studies concerning any type of epilepsy surgery or pathology were accepted, excluding those related to high-grade malignancies.

Results

The search yielded a total of n = 1,690 records. We included n = 21 studies with a total of n = 1,496 patients, which examined variables associated with long-term seizure outcome. Interictal epileptiform discharge presence/laterality, epileptogenic zone size, APOS frequency, and history of generalized tonic–clonic seizures, head trauma, or encephalitis were associated with seizure outcome. Ictal expression and timing of seizure recurrence appeared less relevant. However, these associations are uncertain due to conflicting results between studies, likely due to small sample sizes, a limited reporting of secondary variables, and heterogeneity in study population and methodology.

Conclusions

The variability in clinical outcome following APOS highlights the need for a refined classification of postoperative seizures. Future research should focus on constructing and validating a multifactorial model integrating EEG-derived variables, APOS frequency, and medical history to more accurately predict long-term seizure outcome following resective epilepsy surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Neurochirurgica
Acta Neurochirurgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The journal "Acta Neurochirurgica" publishes only original papers useful both to research and clinical work. Papers should deal with clinical neurosurgery - diagnosis and diagnostic techniques, operative surgery and results, postoperative treatment - or with research work in neuroscience if the underlying questions or the results are of neurosurgical interest. Reports on congresses are given in brief accounts. As official organ of the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies the journal publishes all announcements of the E.A.N.S. and reports on the activities of its member societies. Only contributions written in English will be accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信