适用于电感耦合等离子体质谱法测定潜在无机一级参比物质的非杂质分析程序

IF 0.8 4区 工程技术 Q4 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Jong Wha Lee, Hyung Sik Min, Jinil Kim, Kyoung-Seok Lee
{"title":"适用于电感耦合等离子体质谱法测定潜在无机一级参比物质的非杂质分析程序","authors":"Jong Wha Lee,&nbsp;Hyung Sik Min,&nbsp;Jinil Kim,&nbsp;Kyoung-Seok Lee","doi":"10.1007/s00769-024-01617-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Purity-evaluated inorganic materials, which are potential primary reference materials (PRMs) in chemistry, are crucial to the production of inorganic calibration solutions with metrological traceability to the International System of Units (SI). Purity evaluation is typically performed by individually assaying all possible impurities (gaseous and nongaseous) in a material, but technical challenges and the lack of resources are creating bottlenecks in developing effective purity assay procedures. This study describes a nongaseous impurity assay procedure developed and used at Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS) to evaluate the purities of inorganic PRMs. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) is used to assay more than 60 impurity elements in a single day, and external glow discharge mass spectrometry (GDMS) data are used to complement ICP-MS data. All aspects of the impurity assay procedure, including sample preparation, instrument operation, and data treatment, are described in detail. It is shown that the procedure is applicable to high-purity Al, As, Cu, NaCl, Se, Si, and Zn, and that a target relative uncertainty of 0.005 % for purity values can be satisfied even if individual impurity data are quite uncertain. Particular emphasis is on clearly specifying the measurand and target uncertainty for developing a fit-for-purpose assay procedure, as they determine the acceptable level of assay quality and help preventing misinterpretation of assay results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":454,"journal":{"name":"Accreditation and Quality Assurance","volume":"30 2","pages":"117 - 128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00769-024-01617-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A fit-for-purpose nongaseous impurity assay procedure for potential inorganic primary reference materials by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry\",\"authors\":\"Jong Wha Lee,&nbsp;Hyung Sik Min,&nbsp;Jinil Kim,&nbsp;Kyoung-Seok Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00769-024-01617-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Purity-evaluated inorganic materials, which are potential primary reference materials (PRMs) in chemistry, are crucial to the production of inorganic calibration solutions with metrological traceability to the International System of Units (SI). Purity evaluation is typically performed by individually assaying all possible impurities (gaseous and nongaseous) in a material, but technical challenges and the lack of resources are creating bottlenecks in developing effective purity assay procedures. This study describes a nongaseous impurity assay procedure developed and used at Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS) to evaluate the purities of inorganic PRMs. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) is used to assay more than 60 impurity elements in a single day, and external glow discharge mass spectrometry (GDMS) data are used to complement ICP-MS data. All aspects of the impurity assay procedure, including sample preparation, instrument operation, and data treatment, are described in detail. It is shown that the procedure is applicable to high-purity Al, As, Cu, NaCl, Se, Si, and Zn, and that a target relative uncertainty of 0.005 % for purity values can be satisfied even if individual impurity data are quite uncertain. Particular emphasis is on clearly specifying the measurand and target uncertainty for developing a fit-for-purpose assay procedure, as they determine the acceptable level of assay quality and help preventing misinterpretation of assay results.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accreditation and Quality Assurance\",\"volume\":\"30 2\",\"pages\":\"117 - 128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00769-024-01617-7.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accreditation and Quality Assurance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00769-024-01617-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accreditation and Quality Assurance","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00769-024-01617-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

纯度评估的无机材料是化学中潜在的主要参考物质(PRMs),对于生产具有国际单位制(SI)计量可追溯性的无机校准溶液至关重要。纯度评估通常是通过单独分析材料中所有可能的杂质(气态和非气态)来进行的,但技术挑战和缺乏资源正在成为开发有效纯度分析程序的瓶颈。本研究描述了一种由韩国标准与科学研究院(KRISS)开发和使用的非物质杂质测定程序,用于评估无机PRMs的纯度。电感耦合等离子体质谱(ICP-MS)用于在一天内分析60多种杂质元素,外部辉光放电体质谱(GDMS)数据用于补充ICP-MS数据。杂质分析程序的所有方面,包括样品制备、仪器操作和数据处理,都详细描述。结果表明,该方法适用于高纯度的Al、As、Cu、NaCl、Se、Si和Zn,即使单个杂质数据具有很大的不确定性,也可以满足0.005%的纯度值的目标相对不确定度。特别强调的是明确规定测量和目标不确定度,以制定适合目的的分析程序,因为它们确定了分析质量的可接受水平,并有助于防止分析结果的误解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A fit-for-purpose nongaseous impurity assay procedure for potential inorganic primary reference materials by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry

Purity-evaluated inorganic materials, which are potential primary reference materials (PRMs) in chemistry, are crucial to the production of inorganic calibration solutions with metrological traceability to the International System of Units (SI). Purity evaluation is typically performed by individually assaying all possible impurities (gaseous and nongaseous) in a material, but technical challenges and the lack of resources are creating bottlenecks in developing effective purity assay procedures. This study describes a nongaseous impurity assay procedure developed and used at Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS) to evaluate the purities of inorganic PRMs. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) is used to assay more than 60 impurity elements in a single day, and external glow discharge mass spectrometry (GDMS) data are used to complement ICP-MS data. All aspects of the impurity assay procedure, including sample preparation, instrument operation, and data treatment, are described in detail. It is shown that the procedure is applicable to high-purity Al, As, Cu, NaCl, Se, Si, and Zn, and that a target relative uncertainty of 0.005 % for purity values can be satisfied even if individual impurity data are quite uncertain. Particular emphasis is on clearly specifying the measurand and target uncertainty for developing a fit-for-purpose assay procedure, as they determine the acceptable level of assay quality and help preventing misinterpretation of assay results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accreditation and Quality Assurance
Accreditation and Quality Assurance 工程技术-分析化学
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Accreditation and Quality Assurance has established itself as the leading information and discussion forum for all aspects relevant to quality, transparency and reliability of measurement results in chemical and biological sciences. The journal serves the information needs of researchers, practitioners and decision makers dealing with quality assurance and quality management, including the development and application of metrological principles and concepts such as traceability or measurement uncertainty in the following fields: environment, nutrition, consumer protection, geology, metallurgy, pharmacy, forensics, clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, and microbiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信