镰状性状对孕妇孕产妇和围产期结局的影响

Sarah Sewaralthahab , Jiling Chou , Stephen Fernandez , Nawar Shara , Hedy P. Smith
{"title":"镰状性状对孕妇孕产妇和围产期结局的影响","authors":"Sarah Sewaralthahab ,&nbsp;Jiling Chou ,&nbsp;Stephen Fernandez ,&nbsp;Nawar Shara ,&nbsp;Hedy P. Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.bvth.2025.100049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Abstract</h3><div>The risk of multiple adverse pregnancy outcomes and perinatal outcomes among pregnant women with sickle cell trait (SCT) is not known. Our objective was to compare differences in adverse outcomes, specifically pregnancy-related hypertensive disease (PRHD), pyelonephritis/urinary tract infection (UTI), and low birth weight (LBW), between pregnant women with SCT and healthy controls. This was a retrospective cohort study of women who delivered between 2015 and 2020. We included all women with SCT, that is, hemoglobin electrophoresis AS. Women with SCT were matched in a 1:2 to women without SCT, controlling for age, gravidity, and parity. Our primary outcomes were PRHD, pyelonephritis/UTI, and LBW baby. Multivariable logistic regression modeling examined the associations between patients’ characteristics and the primary outcomes.There were 162 women with SCT, and 324 healthy control women were enrolled. Bivariate analysis revealed that women with SCT had a higher proportion of PRHD (38.9% vs 34.9%; <em>P</em> = .39), pyelonephritis/UTI (11.7% vs 7.1%; <em>P</em> = .09), but a lower proportion of LBW (10.5% vs 16.0%; <em>P</em> = .1). In multivariable analysis, after controlling for confounders, SCT was not an independent predictor of PRHD. However, SCT was an independent predictor of pyelonephritis/UTI (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-3.85) and of a lower risk of having a LBW baby (aOR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.25-0.94). SCT is not associated with an increased risk of PRHD. However, SCT is associated with pregnancy outcomes, including higher risk of pyelonephritis/UTI but a lower risk of LBW babies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100190,"journal":{"name":"Blood Vessels, Thrombosis & Hemostasis","volume":"2 2","pages":"Article 100049"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of sickle trait on maternal and perinatal outcomes among pregnant women\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Sewaralthahab ,&nbsp;Jiling Chou ,&nbsp;Stephen Fernandez ,&nbsp;Nawar Shara ,&nbsp;Hedy P. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bvth.2025.100049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Abstract</h3><div>The risk of multiple adverse pregnancy outcomes and perinatal outcomes among pregnant women with sickle cell trait (SCT) is not known. Our objective was to compare differences in adverse outcomes, specifically pregnancy-related hypertensive disease (PRHD), pyelonephritis/urinary tract infection (UTI), and low birth weight (LBW), between pregnant women with SCT and healthy controls. This was a retrospective cohort study of women who delivered between 2015 and 2020. We included all women with SCT, that is, hemoglobin electrophoresis AS. Women with SCT were matched in a 1:2 to women without SCT, controlling for age, gravidity, and parity. Our primary outcomes were PRHD, pyelonephritis/UTI, and LBW baby. Multivariable logistic regression modeling examined the associations between patients’ characteristics and the primary outcomes.There were 162 women with SCT, and 324 healthy control women were enrolled. Bivariate analysis revealed that women with SCT had a higher proportion of PRHD (38.9% vs 34.9%; <em>P</em> = .39), pyelonephritis/UTI (11.7% vs 7.1%; <em>P</em> = .09), but a lower proportion of LBW (10.5% vs 16.0%; <em>P</em> = .1). In multivariable analysis, after controlling for confounders, SCT was not an independent predictor of PRHD. However, SCT was an independent predictor of pyelonephritis/UTI (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-3.85) and of a lower risk of having a LBW baby (aOR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.25-0.94). SCT is not associated with an increased risk of PRHD. However, SCT is associated with pregnancy outcomes, including higher risk of pyelonephritis/UTI but a lower risk of LBW babies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Vessels, Thrombosis & Hemostasis\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100049\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Vessels, Thrombosis & Hemostasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950327225000063\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Vessels, Thrombosis & Hemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950327225000063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要镰状细胞特征(SCT)孕妇发生多种不良妊娠结局和围产期结局的风险尚不清楚。我们的目的是比较SCT孕妇和健康对照组之间不良结局的差异,特别是妊娠相关高血压疾病(PRHD)、肾盂肾炎/尿路感染(UTI)和低出生体重(LBW)。这是一项针对2015年至2020年间分娩的女性的回顾性队列研究。我们纳入了所有接受SCT的女性,即血红蛋白电泳AS。接受SCT的妇女与未接受SCT的妇女按1:2的比例配对,控制年龄、妊娠和胎次。我们的主要结局是PRHD、肾盂肾炎/UTI和LBW婴儿。多变量logistic回归模型检验了患者特征与主要结局之间的关系。162名接受SCT的女性和324名健康对照女性被纳入研究。双变量分析显示,接受SCT的女性PRHD的比例更高(38.9% vs 34.9%;P = 0.39),肾盂肾炎/尿路感染(11.7% vs 7.1%;P = .09),但LBW比例较低(10.5% vs 16.0%;p = .1)。在多变量分析中,在控制混杂因素后,SCT不是PRHD的独立预测因子。然而,SCT是肾盂肾炎/UTI的独立预测因子(校正优势比[aOR], 1.98;95%可信区间[CI], 1.02-3.85)和低体重儿的风险较低(aOR, 0.48;95% ci, 0.25-0.94)。SCT与PRHD风险增加无关。然而,SCT与妊娠结局相关,包括肾盂肾炎/尿路感染的风险较高,但LBW婴儿的风险较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of sickle trait on maternal and perinatal outcomes among pregnant women

Abstract

The risk of multiple adverse pregnancy outcomes and perinatal outcomes among pregnant women with sickle cell trait (SCT) is not known. Our objective was to compare differences in adverse outcomes, specifically pregnancy-related hypertensive disease (PRHD), pyelonephritis/urinary tract infection (UTI), and low birth weight (LBW), between pregnant women with SCT and healthy controls. This was a retrospective cohort study of women who delivered between 2015 and 2020. We included all women with SCT, that is, hemoglobin electrophoresis AS. Women with SCT were matched in a 1:2 to women without SCT, controlling for age, gravidity, and parity. Our primary outcomes were PRHD, pyelonephritis/UTI, and LBW baby. Multivariable logistic regression modeling examined the associations between patients’ characteristics and the primary outcomes.There were 162 women with SCT, and 324 healthy control women were enrolled. Bivariate analysis revealed that women with SCT had a higher proportion of PRHD (38.9% vs 34.9%; P = .39), pyelonephritis/UTI (11.7% vs 7.1%; P = .09), but a lower proportion of LBW (10.5% vs 16.0%; P = .1). In multivariable analysis, after controlling for confounders, SCT was not an independent predictor of PRHD. However, SCT was an independent predictor of pyelonephritis/UTI (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-3.85) and of a lower risk of having a LBW baby (aOR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.25-0.94). SCT is not associated with an increased risk of PRHD. However, SCT is associated with pregnancy outcomes, including higher risk of pyelonephritis/UTI but a lower risk of LBW babies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信