新生儿复苏模拟学习与传统教学方法的比较：一项随机对照试验

Q2 Nursing

Journal of Neonatal Nursing Pub Date : 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jnn.2025.101646

Lumchio Levis Murry , Gita Razdan , Cecilia Mary , Rimple Sharma , Philomina Thomas , Kamlesh Kumari Sharma , Poonam Joshi , Surya Kant Tiwari

{"title":"新生儿复苏模拟学习与传统教学方法的比较：一项随机对照试验","authors":"Lumchio Levis Murry , Gita Razdan , Cecilia Mary , Rimple Sharma , Philomina Thomas , Kamlesh Kumari Sharma , Poonam Joshi , Surya Kant Tiwari","doi":"10.1016/j.jnn.2025.101646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Simulation-based training is increasingly used in neonatal nursing education to enhance clinical skills, though its effectiveness over traditional methods in neonatal resuscitation remains unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To compare the effectiveness of simulation-based and traditional training in improving nurses' knowledge, skills, and self-confidence in neonatal resuscitation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A parallel-group, single-blinded randomized trial with 32 participants, randomized into a control group (CG, n = 16) receiving traditional training, and an experimental group (EG, n = 16) receiving additional simulation-based training. Paired and independent t-tests were used for statistical analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Both CG and EG groups showed significant improvement in knowledge, skills, and self-confidence (p < 0.01). The CG improved in knowledge (18.81 ± 2.46), skills (21.06 ± 4.27), and self-confidence (17.69 ± 2.77). Similarly, the EG improved in knowledge (19.75 ± 2.02), skills (22.69 ± 5.28), and self-confidence (18.31 ± 2.41). However, no significant differences were found between groups post-intervention (p > 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Simulation-based and traditional training were equally effective for neonatal resuscitation. Traditional methods are valuable alternatives to resource-limited settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35482,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neonatal Nursing","volume":"31 3","pages":"Article 101646"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of simulation-based learning and traditional teaching methods in neonatal resuscitation: A randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Lumchio Levis Murry , Gita Razdan , Cecilia Mary , Rimple Sharma , Philomina Thomas , Kamlesh Kumari Sharma , Poonam Joshi , Surya Kant Tiwari\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jnn.2025.101646\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Simulation-based training is increasingly used in neonatal nursing education to enhance clinical skills, though its effectiveness over traditional methods in neonatal resuscitation remains unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To compare the effectiveness of simulation-based and traditional training in improving nurses' knowledge, skills, and self-confidence in neonatal resuscitation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A parallel-group, single-blinded randomized trial with 32 participants, randomized into a control group (CG, n = 16) receiving traditional training, and an experimental group (EG, n = 16) receiving additional simulation-based training. Paired and independent t-tests were used for statistical analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Both CG and EG groups showed significant improvement in knowledge, skills, and self-confidence (p < 0.01). The CG improved in knowledge (18.81 ± 2.46), skills (21.06 ± 4.27), and self-confidence (17.69 ± 2.77). Similarly, the EG improved in knowledge (19.75 ± 2.02), skills (22.69 ± 5.28), and self-confidence (18.31 ± 2.41). However, no significant differences were found between groups post-intervention (p > 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Simulation-based and traditional training were equally effective for neonatal resuscitation. Traditional methods are valuable alternatives to resource-limited settings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neonatal Nursing\",\"volume\":\"31 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 101646\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neonatal Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1355184125000316\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neonatal Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1355184125000316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

背景：基于模拟的培训越来越多地用于新生儿护理教育，以提高临床技能，尽管其在新生儿复苏方面的传统方法的有效性尚不清楚。目的比较模拟培训与传统培训在提高护士新生儿复苏知识、技能和自信心方面的效果。方法采用平行组、单盲随机试验32例，随机分为对照组（CG, n = 16）接受传统训练，实验组（EG, n = 16）接受额外的模拟训练。采用配对和独立t检验进行统计分析。结果CG组和EG组在知识、技能和自信心方面均有显著提高(p <；0.01)。CG在知识（18.81±2.46）、技能（21.06±4.27）、自信心（17.69±2.77）方面均有改善。EG在知识（19.75±2.02）、技能（22.69±5.28）、自信（18.31±2.41）方面均有显著提高。然而，干预后各组间无显著差异(p >；0.05)。结论模拟训练与传统训练对新生儿复苏的效果相同。对于资源有限的环境，传统方法是有价值的替代方法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Comparison of simulation-based learning and traditional teaching methods in neonatal resuscitation: A randomized controlled trial

Background

Simulation-based training is increasingly used in neonatal nursing education to enhance clinical skills, though its effectiveness over traditional methods in neonatal resuscitation remains unclear.

Objective

To compare the effectiveness of simulation-based and traditional training in improving nurses' knowledge, skills, and self-confidence in neonatal resuscitation.

Methods

A parallel-group, single-blinded randomized trial with 32 participants, randomized into a control group (CG, n = 16) receiving traditional training, and an experimental group (EG, n = 16) receiving additional simulation-based training. Paired and independent t-tests were used for statistical analysis.

Results

Both CG and EG groups showed significant improvement in knowledge, skills, and self-confidence (p < 0.01). The CG improved in knowledge (18.81 ± 2.46), skills (21.06 ± 4.27), and self-confidence (17.69 ± 2.77). Similarly, the EG improved in knowledge (19.75 ± 2.02), skills (22.69 ± 5.28), and self-confidence (18.31 ± 2.41). However, no significant differences were found between groups post-intervention (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Simulation-based and traditional training were equally effective for neonatal resuscitation. Traditional methods are valuable alternatives to resource-limited settings.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Neonatal Nursing Nursing-Pediatrics

CiteScore

2.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

143

期刊介绍： Aims & Scope: This is the practical, bimonthly, research-based journal for all professionals concerned with the care of neonates and their families, both in hospital and the community. It aims to support the development of the essential practice, management, education and health promotion skills required by these professionals. The JNN will provide a forum for the exchange of ideas and information between the range of professionals working in this field; promote cooperation between these professionals; facilitate partnership care with families; provide information and informed opinion; promote innovation and change in the care of neonates and their families; and provide an education resource for this important rapidly developing field.