家庭暴力立法是否减少了对亲密伴侣暴力的宽容态度?来自61个国家男性和女性的纵向证据。

BMJ public health Pub Date : 2025-02-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjph-2024-001837
Robin A Richardson, Nuria Rodriguez-Planas, Alexandria Ree Hadd, Katjana Wiederkehr, Farheen Jamshed, Cari Jo Clark, Tarik Benmarhnia
{"title":"家庭暴力立法是否减少了对亲密伴侣暴力的宽容态度?来自61个国家男性和女性的纵向证据。","authors":"Robin A Richardson, Nuria Rodriguez-Planas, Alexandria Ree Hadd, Katjana Wiederkehr, Farheen Jamshed, Cari Jo Clark, Tarik Benmarhnia","doi":"10.1136/bmjph-2024-001837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong></p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intimate partner violence (IPV) is highly prevalent and has substantial implication for women's health. Changing IPV attitudes is one pathway to reduce IPV. While evidence suggests that interventions targeting individuals may change IPV attitudes, the effect of wider-scale interventions, such as legislation, remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used individual-level IPV attitudes information collected between 1997 and 2020 by the Demographic and Health Surveys and the Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys, which we linked with national-level domestic violence (DV) legislation information. We evaluated the effect of adoption of DV legislation on changes in IPV attitudes using a difference-in-differences study design that controlled for time-varying country-level confounding and accounted for staggered timing of legislation adoption.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our sample included harmonised information across 61 countries, composed of 2 184 047 women from 60 countries and 390 877 men from 40 countries. After controlling for country-level time-varying confounders, adoption of DV legislation reduced IPV acceptability among women (average treatment effect among treated=-0.07, 95% CI: -0.16, 0.06) and men (average treatment effect among treated=-0.11, 95% CI: -0.22, 0.03) although estimates were imprecise and included the null.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DV legislation may reduce permissive IPV attitudes, especially among men, although conclusions should be interpreted cautiously due to imprecise estimates.</p>","PeriodicalId":101362,"journal":{"name":"BMJ public health","volume":"3 1","pages":"e001837"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11891541/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does domestic violence legislation reduce permissive attitudes about intimate partner violence? Longitudinal evidence from men and women from 61 countries.\",\"authors\":\"Robin A Richardson, Nuria Rodriguez-Planas, Alexandria Ree Hadd, Katjana Wiederkehr, Farheen Jamshed, Cari Jo Clark, Tarik Benmarhnia\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjph-2024-001837\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong></p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intimate partner violence (IPV) is highly prevalent and has substantial implication for women's health. Changing IPV attitudes is one pathway to reduce IPV. While evidence suggests that interventions targeting individuals may change IPV attitudes, the effect of wider-scale interventions, such as legislation, remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used individual-level IPV attitudes information collected between 1997 and 2020 by the Demographic and Health Surveys and the Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys, which we linked with national-level domestic violence (DV) legislation information. We evaluated the effect of adoption of DV legislation on changes in IPV attitudes using a difference-in-differences study design that controlled for time-varying country-level confounding and accounted for staggered timing of legislation adoption.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our sample included harmonised information across 61 countries, composed of 2 184 047 women from 60 countries and 390 877 men from 40 countries. After controlling for country-level time-varying confounders, adoption of DV legislation reduced IPV acceptability among women (average treatment effect among treated=-0.07, 95% CI: -0.16, 0.06) and men (average treatment effect among treated=-0.11, 95% CI: -0.22, 0.03) although estimates were imprecise and included the null.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DV legislation may reduce permissive IPV attitudes, especially among men, although conclusions should be interpreted cautiously due to imprecise estimates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ public health\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"e001837\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11891541/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2024-001837\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2024-001837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:导言:亲密伴侣间的暴力行为(IPV)非常普遍,对妇女的健康有很大影响。改变对 IPV 的态度是减少 IPV 的一个途径。虽然有证据表明,针对个人的干预措施可以改变人们对 IPV 的态度,但更大范围的干预措施(如立法)的效果仍不得而知:我们使用了 1997 年至 2020 年间通过人口与健康调查和多指标类集调查收集的个人层面的 IPV 态度信息,并将其与国家层面的家庭暴力(DV)立法信息联系起来。我们采用差分研究设计评估了家庭暴力立法的通过对 IPV 态度变化的影响,该设计控制了国家层面的时变混杂因素,并考虑了立法通过时间的交错:我们的样本包括 61 个国家的统一信息,由来自 60 个国家的 2 184 047 名女性和来自 40 个国家的 390 877 名男性组成。在控制了国家层面的时变混杂因素后,家庭暴力立法的通过降低了女性(受治疗者的平均治疗效果=-0.07,95% CI:-0.16,0.06)和男性(受治疗者的平均治疗效果=-0.11,95% CI:-0.22,0.03)对 IPV 的可接受性,尽管估计值并不精确且包含零值:DV立法可能会降低对IPV的纵容态度,尤其是在男性中,但由于估计值不精确,应谨慎解释结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does domestic violence legislation reduce permissive attitudes about intimate partner violence? Longitudinal evidence from men and women from 61 countries.

Abstract:

Introduction: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is highly prevalent and has substantial implication for women's health. Changing IPV attitudes is one pathway to reduce IPV. While evidence suggests that interventions targeting individuals may change IPV attitudes, the effect of wider-scale interventions, such as legislation, remains unknown.

Methods: We used individual-level IPV attitudes information collected between 1997 and 2020 by the Demographic and Health Surveys and the Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys, which we linked with national-level domestic violence (DV) legislation information. We evaluated the effect of adoption of DV legislation on changes in IPV attitudes using a difference-in-differences study design that controlled for time-varying country-level confounding and accounted for staggered timing of legislation adoption.

Results: Our sample included harmonised information across 61 countries, composed of 2 184 047 women from 60 countries and 390 877 men from 40 countries. After controlling for country-level time-varying confounders, adoption of DV legislation reduced IPV acceptability among women (average treatment effect among treated=-0.07, 95% CI: -0.16, 0.06) and men (average treatment effect among treated=-0.11, 95% CI: -0.22, 0.03) although estimates were imprecise and included the null.

Conclusions: DV legislation may reduce permissive IPV attitudes, especially among men, although conclusions should be interpreted cautiously due to imprecise estimates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信