ALS进展中的种族差异:在单个中心观察到临床事件的时间。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Muscle & Nerve Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1002/mus.28390
Shanshan Chen, Demetrius Carter, Jillian Prier, JoBeth Bingham, Shital Patel, Manisha Kotay, Paula Burke Brockenbrough, Kelly Gwathmey
{"title":"ALS进展中的种族差异:在单个中心观察到临床事件的时间。","authors":"Shanshan Chen, Demetrius Carter, Jillian Prier, JoBeth Bingham, Shital Patel, Manisha Kotay, Paula Burke Brockenbrough, Kelly Gwathmey","doi":"10.1002/mus.28390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/aims: </strong>Studies examining racial differences in ALS have previously focused on diagnostic delay and disease severity. Time to critical clinical events has rarely been investigated, despite its importance in revealing differences in ALS patients' disease courses. This study explores racial disparities in time to specific clinical events in Black and non-Hispanic White ALS patients at a single center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of 33 Black and 170 non-Hispanic White ALS patients examined at Virginia Commonwealth University between 2017 and 2023. Diagnosis dates, referral dates for wheelchair, noninvasive ventilation (NIV), augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) and hospice, along with demographic and clinical factors, were collected. We analyzed the racial difference for events occurring before or on the day of diagnosis using logistic regression models, and for events occurring after diagnosis using Cox proportional hazard models, adjusting for relevant demographic and clinical factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Black patients had significantly higher odds of acquiring a wheelchair (odds ratio = 4.06, p = 0.015) and NIV before diagnosis (odds ratio = 2.93, p = 0.017). Following diagnosis, Black patients had 1.72 times the hazards for wheelchair referral (p = 0.051), 2.17 times the hazard for NIV referral (p < 0.001), 1.84 times the hazard for AAC referral (p = 0.034), and 1.59 times the hazard for hospice referral (p = 0.24).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our single-center findings demonstrate a large racial difference in time to clinical events for Black versus White ALS patients referred for NIV, AAC, hospice, and wheelchair, suggesting more advanced disease at the time of presentation or more rapid progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":18968,"journal":{"name":"Muscle & Nerve","volume":" ","pages":"1086-1090"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12060626/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racial Disparities in ALS Progression: Time to Clinical Events Observed in a Single Center.\",\"authors\":\"Shanshan Chen, Demetrius Carter, Jillian Prier, JoBeth Bingham, Shital Patel, Manisha Kotay, Paula Burke Brockenbrough, Kelly Gwathmey\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mus.28390\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction/aims: </strong>Studies examining racial differences in ALS have previously focused on diagnostic delay and disease severity. Time to critical clinical events has rarely been investigated, despite its importance in revealing differences in ALS patients' disease courses. This study explores racial disparities in time to specific clinical events in Black and non-Hispanic White ALS patients at a single center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of 33 Black and 170 non-Hispanic White ALS patients examined at Virginia Commonwealth University between 2017 and 2023. Diagnosis dates, referral dates for wheelchair, noninvasive ventilation (NIV), augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) and hospice, along with demographic and clinical factors, were collected. We analyzed the racial difference for events occurring before or on the day of diagnosis using logistic regression models, and for events occurring after diagnosis using Cox proportional hazard models, adjusting for relevant demographic and clinical factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Black patients had significantly higher odds of acquiring a wheelchair (odds ratio = 4.06, p = 0.015) and NIV before diagnosis (odds ratio = 2.93, p = 0.017). Following diagnosis, Black patients had 1.72 times the hazards for wheelchair referral (p = 0.051), 2.17 times the hazard for NIV referral (p < 0.001), 1.84 times the hazard for AAC referral (p = 0.034), and 1.59 times the hazard for hospice referral (p = 0.24).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our single-center findings demonstrate a large racial difference in time to clinical events for Black versus White ALS patients referred for NIV, AAC, hospice, and wheelchair, suggesting more advanced disease at the time of presentation or more rapid progression.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18968,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Muscle & Nerve\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1086-1090\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12060626/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Muscle & Nerve\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.28390\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muscle & Nerve","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.28390","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介/目的:研究ALS的种族差异以前主要集中在诊断延迟和疾病严重程度上。关键临床事件发生的时间很少被研究,尽管它在揭示ALS患者病程差异方面很重要。本研究在单一中心探讨黑人和非西班牙裔白人ALS患者特定临床事件的时间上的种族差异。方法:我们对2017年至2023年在弗吉尼亚联邦大学接受检查的33名黑人和170名非西班牙裔白人ALS患者进行了回顾性分析。收集诊断日期、轮椅转诊日期、无创通气(NIV)、辅助和替代沟通(AAC)和临终关怀,以及人口统计学和临床因素。我们使用逻辑回归模型分析了在诊断前或当天发生的事件的种族差异,并使用Cox比例风险模型分析了诊断后发生的事件,调整了相关的人口统计学和临床因素。结果:黑人患者在诊断前获得轮椅(优势比= 4.06,p = 0.015)和NIV(优势比= 2.93,p = 0.017)的几率显著高于黑人患者。诊断后,黑人患者转诊到轮椅的风险是白人患者的1.72倍(p = 0.051),转诊到NIV的风险是白人患者的2.17倍(p)讨论:我们的单中心研究结果表明,黑人与白人患者转诊到NIV、AAC、临终关怀和轮椅的临床事件发生时间存在很大的种族差异,这表明在出现时疾病更晚期或进展更快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Racial Disparities in ALS Progression: Time to Clinical Events Observed in a Single Center.

Introduction/aims: Studies examining racial differences in ALS have previously focused on diagnostic delay and disease severity. Time to critical clinical events has rarely been investigated, despite its importance in revealing differences in ALS patients' disease courses. This study explores racial disparities in time to specific clinical events in Black and non-Hispanic White ALS patients at a single center.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 33 Black and 170 non-Hispanic White ALS patients examined at Virginia Commonwealth University between 2017 and 2023. Diagnosis dates, referral dates for wheelchair, noninvasive ventilation (NIV), augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) and hospice, along with demographic and clinical factors, were collected. We analyzed the racial difference for events occurring before or on the day of diagnosis using logistic regression models, and for events occurring after diagnosis using Cox proportional hazard models, adjusting for relevant demographic and clinical factors.

Results: Black patients had significantly higher odds of acquiring a wheelchair (odds ratio = 4.06, p = 0.015) and NIV before diagnosis (odds ratio = 2.93, p = 0.017). Following diagnosis, Black patients had 1.72 times the hazards for wheelchair referral (p = 0.051), 2.17 times the hazard for NIV referral (p < 0.001), 1.84 times the hazard for AAC referral (p = 0.034), and 1.59 times the hazard for hospice referral (p = 0.24).

Discussion: Our single-center findings demonstrate a large racial difference in time to clinical events for Black versus White ALS patients referred for NIV, AAC, hospice, and wheelchair, suggesting more advanced disease at the time of presentation or more rapid progression.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Muscle & Nerve
Muscle & Nerve 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
287
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Muscle & Nerve is an international and interdisciplinary publication of original contributions, in both health and disease, concerning studies of the muscle, the neuromuscular junction, the peripheral motor, sensory and autonomic neurons, and the central nervous system where the behavior of the peripheral nervous system is clarified. Appearing monthly, Muscle & Nerve publishes clinical studies and clinically relevant research reports in the fields of anatomy, biochemistry, cell biology, electrophysiology and electrodiagnosis, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, pathology, pharmacology, physiology, toxicology, and virology. The Journal welcomes articles and reports on basic clinical electrophysiology and electrodiagnosis. We expedite some papers dealing with timely topics to keep up with the fast-moving pace of science, based on the referees'' recommendation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信