Pedro A Sousa, Carolina Saleiro, Sérgio Barra, Inês Fonseca, Luís Elvas, John Silberbauer, Lino Gonçalves
{"title":"八线多电极导管和单极参考位置在室性早搏消融中的作用。","authors":"Pedro A Sousa, Carolina Saleiro, Sérgio Barra, Inês Fonseca, Luís Elvas, John Silberbauer, Lino Gonçalves","doi":"10.1111/jce.16618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An accurate local activation time (LAT) map is essential during premature ventricular contraction (PVC) ablation. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the use of a novel octaspline multielectrode catheter, with and without the use of a catheter-embedded unipolar reference, improves LAT mapping during PVC ablation compared to a pre-existing pentaspline mapping catheter.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study prospectively assessed 10 consecutive patients referred for PVC ablation from January to June 2023. Three 12-min LAT maps were performed in each patient using three different strategies: pentaspline catheter + unipolar reference in the inferior vena cava (IVC) versus octaspline catheter + unipolar in the IVC versus octaspline catheter + unipolar embedded in the mapping catheter. Acute procedural and midterm endpoints were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of an octaspline catheter increased the number of total LAT points (1010 ± 451 vs. 397 ± 213, p = 0.001), LAT points near the successful RF ablation site (118 ± 105 vs. 21 ± 19, p = 0.010) and electrograms (EGM) per PVC (23 ± 21 vs. 7 ± 3, p = 0.032), while reducing mapping duration (65 ± 41 EGM/min vs. 21 ± 8 EGM/min, p = 0.003). However, signal resolution was not superior to that obtained with the pentaspline catheter, with similar bipolar (p = 0.505) and unipolar (p = 0.176) voltages, an increased bipolar signal duration (p = 0.003) and a reduction in the unipolar signal duration (p = 0.013). Use of a catheter-embedded unipolar reference led to shorter unipolar signal duration (76 ± 34 ms vs. 142 ± 29 ms, p < 0.001), and provided an earlier unipolar signal deflection to QRS onset (-24 ± 16 ms vs. -19 ± 11 ms, p = 0.006) and earlier -dV/dT signal annotation (-12 ± 10 ms vs. -7 ± 9 ms, p < 0.001). This subsequently led to a shorter distance from the earliest LAT to successful RF site (p = 0.014). No significant differences between multielectrode mapping catheters were seen regarding catheter-induced ectopy rate (p = 0.703).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of an octaspline catheter combined with an embedded unipolar reference may associate with faster, more detailed and accurate activation mapping in the setting of PVC ablation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of Octaspline Multielectrode Catheter and Unipolar Reference Location for Premature Ventricular Contraction Ablation.\",\"authors\":\"Pedro A Sousa, Carolina Saleiro, Sérgio Barra, Inês Fonseca, Luís Elvas, John Silberbauer, Lino Gonçalves\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jce.16618\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An accurate local activation time (LAT) map is essential during premature ventricular contraction (PVC) ablation. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the use of a novel octaspline multielectrode catheter, with and without the use of a catheter-embedded unipolar reference, improves LAT mapping during PVC ablation compared to a pre-existing pentaspline mapping catheter.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study prospectively assessed 10 consecutive patients referred for PVC ablation from January to June 2023. Three 12-min LAT maps were performed in each patient using three different strategies: pentaspline catheter + unipolar reference in the inferior vena cava (IVC) versus octaspline catheter + unipolar in the IVC versus octaspline catheter + unipolar embedded in the mapping catheter. Acute procedural and midterm endpoints were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of an octaspline catheter increased the number of total LAT points (1010 ± 451 vs. 397 ± 213, p = 0.001), LAT points near the successful RF ablation site (118 ± 105 vs. 21 ± 19, p = 0.010) and electrograms (EGM) per PVC (23 ± 21 vs. 7 ± 3, p = 0.032), while reducing mapping duration (65 ± 41 EGM/min vs. 21 ± 8 EGM/min, p = 0.003). However, signal resolution was not superior to that obtained with the pentaspline catheter, with similar bipolar (p = 0.505) and unipolar (p = 0.176) voltages, an increased bipolar signal duration (p = 0.003) and a reduction in the unipolar signal duration (p = 0.013). Use of a catheter-embedded unipolar reference led to shorter unipolar signal duration (76 ± 34 ms vs. 142 ± 29 ms, p < 0.001), and provided an earlier unipolar signal deflection to QRS onset (-24 ± 16 ms vs. -19 ± 11 ms, p = 0.006) and earlier -dV/dT signal annotation (-12 ± 10 ms vs. -7 ± 9 ms, p < 0.001). This subsequently led to a shorter distance from the earliest LAT to successful RF site (p = 0.014). No significant differences between multielectrode mapping catheters were seen regarding catheter-induced ectopy rate (p = 0.703).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of an octaspline catheter combined with an embedded unipolar reference may associate with faster, more detailed and accurate activation mapping in the setting of PVC ablation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16618\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16618","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在室性早搏(PVC)消融术中,准确的局部激活时间(LAT)图是必不可少的。本研究的目的是评估使用新型八线多电极导管,无论是否使用导管内嵌的单极参比,与已有的五线定位导管相比,是否能改善PVC消融期间的LAT定位。方法:本研究前瞻性评估了2023年1月至6月10例连续行PVC消融术的患者。采用三种不同的策略对每位患者进行3次12分钟LAT定位:下腔静脉(IVC)内的pentaspline导管+单极参考,IVC内的octaspline导管+单极参考,以及octaspline导管+单极嵌入定位导管。评估急性过程终点和中期终点。结果:八线导管的使用增加了总LAT点的数量(1010±451比397±213,p = 0.001),成功射频消融部位附近的LAT点(118±105比21±19,p = 0.010)和每个PVC的电图(23±21比7±3,p = 0.032),同时缩短了测绘时间(65±41 EGM/min比21±8 EGM/min, p = 0.003)。然而,信号分辨率并不优于pentaspline导管,双极(p = 0.505)和单极(p = 0.176)电压相似,双极信号持续时间增加(p = 0.003),单极信号持续时间减少(p = 0.013)。使用导管内嵌单极参比可缩短单极信号持续时间(76±34 ms vs. 142±29 ms)。结论:在PVC消融术中,使用八线导管联合内嵌单极参比可实现更快、更详细和更准确的激活定位。
Role of Octaspline Multielectrode Catheter and Unipolar Reference Location for Premature Ventricular Contraction Ablation.
Background: An accurate local activation time (LAT) map is essential during premature ventricular contraction (PVC) ablation. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the use of a novel octaspline multielectrode catheter, with and without the use of a catheter-embedded unipolar reference, improves LAT mapping during PVC ablation compared to a pre-existing pentaspline mapping catheter.
Methods: This study prospectively assessed 10 consecutive patients referred for PVC ablation from January to June 2023. Three 12-min LAT maps were performed in each patient using three different strategies: pentaspline catheter + unipolar reference in the inferior vena cava (IVC) versus octaspline catheter + unipolar in the IVC versus octaspline catheter + unipolar embedded in the mapping catheter. Acute procedural and midterm endpoints were assessed.
Results: The use of an octaspline catheter increased the number of total LAT points (1010 ± 451 vs. 397 ± 213, p = 0.001), LAT points near the successful RF ablation site (118 ± 105 vs. 21 ± 19, p = 0.010) and electrograms (EGM) per PVC (23 ± 21 vs. 7 ± 3, p = 0.032), while reducing mapping duration (65 ± 41 EGM/min vs. 21 ± 8 EGM/min, p = 0.003). However, signal resolution was not superior to that obtained with the pentaspline catheter, with similar bipolar (p = 0.505) and unipolar (p = 0.176) voltages, an increased bipolar signal duration (p = 0.003) and a reduction in the unipolar signal duration (p = 0.013). Use of a catheter-embedded unipolar reference led to shorter unipolar signal duration (76 ± 34 ms vs. 142 ± 29 ms, p < 0.001), and provided an earlier unipolar signal deflection to QRS onset (-24 ± 16 ms vs. -19 ± 11 ms, p = 0.006) and earlier -dV/dT signal annotation (-12 ± 10 ms vs. -7 ± 9 ms, p < 0.001). This subsequently led to a shorter distance from the earliest LAT to successful RF site (p = 0.014). No significant differences between multielectrode mapping catheters were seen regarding catheter-induced ectopy rate (p = 0.703).
Conclusions: The use of an octaspline catheter combined with an embedded unipolar reference may associate with faster, more detailed and accurate activation mapping in the setting of PVC ablation.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.