八线多电极导管和单极参考位置在室性早搏消融中的作用。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Pedro A Sousa, Carolina Saleiro, Sérgio Barra, Inês Fonseca, Luís Elvas, John Silberbauer, Lino Gonçalves
{"title":"八线多电极导管和单极参考位置在室性早搏消融中的作用。","authors":"Pedro A Sousa, Carolina Saleiro, Sérgio Barra, Inês Fonseca, Luís Elvas, John Silberbauer, Lino Gonçalves","doi":"10.1111/jce.16618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An accurate local activation time (LAT) map is essential during premature ventricular contraction (PVC) ablation. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the use of a novel octaspline multielectrode catheter, with and without the use of a catheter-embedded unipolar reference, improves LAT mapping during PVC ablation compared to a pre-existing pentaspline mapping catheter.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study prospectively assessed 10 consecutive patients referred for PVC ablation from January to June 2023. Three 12-min LAT maps were performed in each patient using three different strategies: pentaspline catheter + unipolar reference in the inferior vena cava (IVC) versus octaspline catheter + unipolar in the IVC versus octaspline catheter + unipolar embedded in the mapping catheter. Acute procedural and midterm endpoints were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of an octaspline catheter increased the number of total LAT points (1010 ± 451 vs. 397 ± 213, p = 0.001), LAT points near the successful RF ablation site (118 ± 105 vs. 21 ± 19, p = 0.010) and electrograms (EGM) per PVC (23 ± 21 vs. 7 ± 3, p = 0.032), while reducing mapping duration (65 ± 41 EGM/min vs. 21 ± 8 EGM/min, p = 0.003). However, signal resolution was not superior to that obtained with the pentaspline catheter, with similar bipolar (p = 0.505) and unipolar (p = 0.176) voltages, an increased bipolar signal duration (p = 0.003) and a reduction in the unipolar signal duration (p = 0.013). Use of a catheter-embedded unipolar reference led to shorter unipolar signal duration (76 ± 34 ms vs. 142 ± 29 ms, p < 0.001), and provided an earlier unipolar signal deflection to QRS onset (-24 ± 16 ms vs. -19 ± 11 ms, p = 0.006) and earlier -dV/dT signal annotation (-12 ± 10 ms vs. -7 ± 9 ms, p < 0.001). This subsequently led to a shorter distance from the earliest LAT to successful RF site (p = 0.014). No significant differences between multielectrode mapping catheters were seen regarding catheter-induced ectopy rate (p = 0.703).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of an octaspline catheter combined with an embedded unipolar reference may associate with faster, more detailed and accurate activation mapping in the setting of PVC ablation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of Octaspline Multielectrode Catheter and Unipolar Reference Location for Premature Ventricular Contraction Ablation.\",\"authors\":\"Pedro A Sousa, Carolina Saleiro, Sérgio Barra, Inês Fonseca, Luís Elvas, John Silberbauer, Lino Gonçalves\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jce.16618\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An accurate local activation time (LAT) map is essential during premature ventricular contraction (PVC) ablation. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the use of a novel octaspline multielectrode catheter, with and without the use of a catheter-embedded unipolar reference, improves LAT mapping during PVC ablation compared to a pre-existing pentaspline mapping catheter.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study prospectively assessed 10 consecutive patients referred for PVC ablation from January to June 2023. Three 12-min LAT maps were performed in each patient using three different strategies: pentaspline catheter + unipolar reference in the inferior vena cava (IVC) versus octaspline catheter + unipolar in the IVC versus octaspline catheter + unipolar embedded in the mapping catheter. Acute procedural and midterm endpoints were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of an octaspline catheter increased the number of total LAT points (1010 ± 451 vs. 397 ± 213, p = 0.001), LAT points near the successful RF ablation site (118 ± 105 vs. 21 ± 19, p = 0.010) and electrograms (EGM) per PVC (23 ± 21 vs. 7 ± 3, p = 0.032), while reducing mapping duration (65 ± 41 EGM/min vs. 21 ± 8 EGM/min, p = 0.003). However, signal resolution was not superior to that obtained with the pentaspline catheter, with similar bipolar (p = 0.505) and unipolar (p = 0.176) voltages, an increased bipolar signal duration (p = 0.003) and a reduction in the unipolar signal duration (p = 0.013). Use of a catheter-embedded unipolar reference led to shorter unipolar signal duration (76 ± 34 ms vs. 142 ± 29 ms, p < 0.001), and provided an earlier unipolar signal deflection to QRS onset (-24 ± 16 ms vs. -19 ± 11 ms, p = 0.006) and earlier -dV/dT signal annotation (-12 ± 10 ms vs. -7 ± 9 ms, p < 0.001). This subsequently led to a shorter distance from the earliest LAT to successful RF site (p = 0.014). No significant differences between multielectrode mapping catheters were seen regarding catheter-induced ectopy rate (p = 0.703).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of an octaspline catheter combined with an embedded unipolar reference may associate with faster, more detailed and accurate activation mapping in the setting of PVC ablation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16618\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16618","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在室性早搏(PVC)消融术中,准确的局部激活时间(LAT)图是必不可少的。本研究的目的是评估使用新型八线多电极导管,无论是否使用导管内嵌的单极参比,与已有的五线定位导管相比,是否能改善PVC消融期间的LAT定位。方法:本研究前瞻性评估了2023年1月至6月10例连续行PVC消融术的患者。采用三种不同的策略对每位患者进行3次12分钟LAT定位:下腔静脉(IVC)内的pentaspline导管+单极参考,IVC内的octaspline导管+单极参考,以及octaspline导管+单极嵌入定位导管。评估急性过程终点和中期终点。结果:八线导管的使用增加了总LAT点的数量(1010±451比397±213,p = 0.001),成功射频消融部位附近的LAT点(118±105比21±19,p = 0.010)和每个PVC的电图(23±21比7±3,p = 0.032),同时缩短了测绘时间(65±41 EGM/min比21±8 EGM/min, p = 0.003)。然而,信号分辨率并不优于pentaspline导管,双极(p = 0.505)和单极(p = 0.176)电压相似,双极信号持续时间增加(p = 0.003),单极信号持续时间减少(p = 0.013)。使用导管内嵌单极参比可缩短单极信号持续时间(76±34 ms vs. 142±29 ms)。结论:在PVC消融术中,使用八线导管联合内嵌单极参比可实现更快、更详细和更准确的激活定位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Role of Octaspline Multielectrode Catheter and Unipolar Reference Location for Premature Ventricular Contraction Ablation.

Background: An accurate local activation time (LAT) map is essential during premature ventricular contraction (PVC) ablation. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the use of a novel octaspline multielectrode catheter, with and without the use of a catheter-embedded unipolar reference, improves LAT mapping during PVC ablation compared to a pre-existing pentaspline mapping catheter.

Methods: This study prospectively assessed 10 consecutive patients referred for PVC ablation from January to June 2023. Three 12-min LAT maps were performed in each patient using three different strategies: pentaspline catheter + unipolar reference in the inferior vena cava (IVC) versus octaspline catheter + unipolar in the IVC versus octaspline catheter + unipolar embedded in the mapping catheter. Acute procedural and midterm endpoints were assessed.

Results: The use of an octaspline catheter increased the number of total LAT points (1010 ± 451 vs. 397 ± 213, p = 0.001), LAT points near the successful RF ablation site (118 ± 105 vs. 21 ± 19, p = 0.010) and electrograms (EGM) per PVC (23 ± 21 vs. 7 ± 3, p = 0.032), while reducing mapping duration (65 ± 41 EGM/min vs. 21 ± 8 EGM/min, p = 0.003). However, signal resolution was not superior to that obtained with the pentaspline catheter, with similar bipolar (p = 0.505) and unipolar (p = 0.176) voltages, an increased bipolar signal duration (p = 0.003) and a reduction in the unipolar signal duration (p = 0.013). Use of a catheter-embedded unipolar reference led to shorter unipolar signal duration (76 ± 34 ms vs. 142 ± 29 ms, p < 0.001), and provided an earlier unipolar signal deflection to QRS onset (-24 ± 16 ms vs. -19 ± 11 ms, p = 0.006) and earlier -dV/dT signal annotation (-12 ± 10 ms vs. -7 ± 9 ms, p < 0.001). This subsequently led to a shorter distance from the earliest LAT to successful RF site (p = 0.014). No significant differences between multielectrode mapping catheters were seen regarding catheter-induced ectopy rate (p = 0.703).

Conclusions: The use of an octaspline catheter combined with an embedded unipolar reference may associate with faster, more detailed and accurate activation mapping in the setting of PVC ablation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.80%
发文量
433
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信