在多供应商环境中调试独立的自适应放射治疗直线加速器。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Sven Olberg, David M. McClatchy 3rd, Colleen Foote, Susu Yan, Jennifer Pursley
{"title":"在多供应商环境中调试独立的自适应放射治疗直线加速器。","authors":"Sven Olberg,&nbsp;David M. McClatchy 3rd,&nbsp;Colleen Foote,&nbsp;Susu Yan,&nbsp;Jennifer Pursley","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Current radiotherapy machines intended to perform streamlined online adaptive therapy are designed to be standalone, which makes it challenging to integrate them with the rest of the clinic. This work describes the installation of a standalone CT-guided online adaptive system, the Varian Ethos, in a busy clinic utilizing products from multiple vendors, including RayStation as the treatment planning system (TPS) and MOSAIQ as the oncology information system (OIS). The aim was to develop solutions that minimized workload increases for staff using redundant systems and to implement this new technology safely, with no increase in safety reports resulting from its integration into the clinic. The Ethos was delivered with a pre-configured beam model, and a separate Ethos beam model was developed in RayStation 10A. Non-adaptive treatments were planned in RayStation and transferred to Ethos for delivery. Although MOSAIQ 2.64 could not communicate with the Ethos, a machine characterization file was developed to allow manual recording of the treatment fields in MOSAIQ. Online adaptive therapy was performed using the Ethos TPS and OIS with documentation in MOSAIQ. Although dose calculations of the same plans differed by 1%–2% in the pelvis in RayStation compared to the Ethos TPS, dose computed in both systems passed measurement-based QA, end-to-end testing, and clinical trial credentialing, so both systems were commissioned for clinical use. RayStation plans were successfully modified for delivery on Ethos, and at go-live, all non-adaptive planning was performed in RayStation and adaptive planning in Ethos. Ethos treatments were documented in MOSIAQ, which remained the OIS of record for all patients. Monitoring of error reports indicated some unique failure modes to the new technology, but the overall number of safety reports remained comparable to other systems. In conclusion, Ethos was successfully deployed for both non-adaptive and online adaptive therapy in a multi-vendor environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70033","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commissioning a standalone adaptive radiotherapy linac in a multi-vendor environment\",\"authors\":\"Sven Olberg,&nbsp;David M. McClatchy 3rd,&nbsp;Colleen Foote,&nbsp;Susu Yan,&nbsp;Jennifer Pursley\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acm2.70033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Current radiotherapy machines intended to perform streamlined online adaptive therapy are designed to be standalone, which makes it challenging to integrate them with the rest of the clinic. This work describes the installation of a standalone CT-guided online adaptive system, the Varian Ethos, in a busy clinic utilizing products from multiple vendors, including RayStation as the treatment planning system (TPS) and MOSAIQ as the oncology information system (OIS). The aim was to develop solutions that minimized workload increases for staff using redundant systems and to implement this new technology safely, with no increase in safety reports resulting from its integration into the clinic. The Ethos was delivered with a pre-configured beam model, and a separate Ethos beam model was developed in RayStation 10A. Non-adaptive treatments were planned in RayStation and transferred to Ethos for delivery. Although MOSAIQ 2.64 could not communicate with the Ethos, a machine characterization file was developed to allow manual recording of the treatment fields in MOSAIQ. Online adaptive therapy was performed using the Ethos TPS and OIS with documentation in MOSAIQ. Although dose calculations of the same plans differed by 1%–2% in the pelvis in RayStation compared to the Ethos TPS, dose computed in both systems passed measurement-based QA, end-to-end testing, and clinical trial credentialing, so both systems were commissioned for clinical use. RayStation plans were successfully modified for delivery on Ethos, and at go-live, all non-adaptive planning was performed in RayStation and adaptive planning in Ethos. Ethos treatments were documented in MOSIAQ, which remained the OIS of record for all patients. Monitoring of error reports indicated some unique failure modes to the new technology, but the overall number of safety reports remained comparable to other systems. In conclusion, Ethos was successfully deployed for both non-adaptive and online adaptive therapy in a multi-vendor environment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"26 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70033\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70033\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前用于执行流线型在线适应性治疗的放射治疗机器被设计为独立的,这使得将它们与诊所的其他部分整合起来具有挑战性。这项工作描述了在繁忙的诊所中安装独立的ct引导在线自适应系统Varian Ethos,该系统使用来自多个供应商的产品,包括作为治疗计划系统(TPS)的RayStation和作为肿瘤信息系统(OIS)的MOSAIQ。其目的是开发解决方案,最大限度地减少使用冗余系统的工作人员的工作量增加,并安全地实施这项新技术,同时不会因其集成到诊所而增加安全报告。Ethos与预配置的光束模型一起交付,并且在RayStation 10A中开发了一个单独的Ethos光束模型。在RayStation中计划非适应性处理,并将其转移到Ethos进行交付。虽然MOSAIQ 2.64不能与Ethos通信,但开发了一个机器表征文件,允许在MOSAIQ中手动记录处理场。使用Ethos TPS和OIS进行在线适应性治疗,并在MOSAIQ中进行记录。尽管与Ethos TPS相比,RayStation在骨盆中计算的剂量相差1%-2%,但两种系统中计算的剂量都通过了基于测量的QA、端到端测试和临床试验认证,因此两种系统都投入了临床使用。在Ethos上成功修改了RayStation计划,并且在上线时,所有非适应性计划都在RayStation中执行,而在Ethos中执行适应性计划。在MOSIAQ中记录了Ethos治疗,并保留了所有患者的OIS记录。对错误报告的监测表明,新技术存在一些独特的故障模式,但安全报告的总体数量与其他系统相当。综上所述,Ethos在多供应商环境中成功应用于非自适应治疗和在线自适应治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Commissioning a standalone adaptive radiotherapy linac in a multi-vendor environment

Commissioning a standalone adaptive radiotherapy linac in a multi-vendor environment

Current radiotherapy machines intended to perform streamlined online adaptive therapy are designed to be standalone, which makes it challenging to integrate them with the rest of the clinic. This work describes the installation of a standalone CT-guided online adaptive system, the Varian Ethos, in a busy clinic utilizing products from multiple vendors, including RayStation as the treatment planning system (TPS) and MOSAIQ as the oncology information system (OIS). The aim was to develop solutions that minimized workload increases for staff using redundant systems and to implement this new technology safely, with no increase in safety reports resulting from its integration into the clinic. The Ethos was delivered with a pre-configured beam model, and a separate Ethos beam model was developed in RayStation 10A. Non-adaptive treatments were planned in RayStation and transferred to Ethos for delivery. Although MOSAIQ 2.64 could not communicate with the Ethos, a machine characterization file was developed to allow manual recording of the treatment fields in MOSAIQ. Online adaptive therapy was performed using the Ethos TPS and OIS with documentation in MOSAIQ. Although dose calculations of the same plans differed by 1%–2% in the pelvis in RayStation compared to the Ethos TPS, dose computed in both systems passed measurement-based QA, end-to-end testing, and clinical trial credentialing, so both systems were commissioned for clinical use. RayStation plans were successfully modified for delivery on Ethos, and at go-live, all non-adaptive planning was performed in RayStation and adaptive planning in Ethos. Ethos treatments were documented in MOSIAQ, which remained the OIS of record for all patients. Monitoring of error reports indicated some unique failure modes to the new technology, but the overall number of safety reports remained comparable to other systems. In conclusion, Ethos was successfully deployed for both non-adaptive and online adaptive therapy in a multi-vendor environment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信