柔性光学插管技术的培训和评估。范围审查的规程

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Johan D V Jokinen, Clara Cantby, Anne-Karina A Torkov, Anne C Brøchner, Lars Konge, Anders B Nielsen, Martine S Nielsen
{"title":"柔性光学插管技术的培训和评估。范围审查的规程","authors":"Johan D V Jokinen, Clara Cantby, Anne-Karina A Torkov, Anne C Brøchner, Lars Konge, Anders B Nielsen, Martine S Nielsen","doi":"10.1111/aas.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Flexible optical intubation (FOI) is the preferred technique for managing anticipated difficult airways, particularly in awake patients when anatomical factors complicate conventional laryngoscopy. Mastering the procedure requires skills, but a comprehensive overview of the evidence on training and assessment of FOI skills is lacking. There is no evidence-based consensus on educational strategies and recommendations for skill acquisition and retention, thus highlighting a significant gap in airway management training. Accordingly, we aim to assess the current evidence on training and assessment in FOI for future educational recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement and the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews guideline. Eligible studies include qualitative and quantitative research focusing on education, technical training, and assessment of FOI skills in clinical personnel with no obligate comparator. Outcomes should be assessable using Kirkpatrick's four levels of training evaluation. A systematic literature search will be conducted across multiple databases, including Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Cinahl, Scopus, and PubMed. Two independent authors will screen the studies, with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer. Extracted data will be analyzed descriptively, with a discussion on potential biases in the included literature. The quality of the studies will be assessed using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results of this scoping review may serve as a foundation for educational recommendations. By synthesizing available evidence, this review aims to guide future research and policy recommendations for FOI skill acquisition and maintenance.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":"69 4","pages":"e70019"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11894585/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Training and assessment of skills in flexible optical intubation - Protocol of a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Johan D V Jokinen, Clara Cantby, Anne-Karina A Torkov, Anne C Brøchner, Lars Konge, Anders B Nielsen, Martine S Nielsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aas.70019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Flexible optical intubation (FOI) is the preferred technique for managing anticipated difficult airways, particularly in awake patients when anatomical factors complicate conventional laryngoscopy. Mastering the procedure requires skills, but a comprehensive overview of the evidence on training and assessment of FOI skills is lacking. There is no evidence-based consensus on educational strategies and recommendations for skill acquisition and retention, thus highlighting a significant gap in airway management training. Accordingly, we aim to assess the current evidence on training and assessment in FOI for future educational recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement and the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews guideline. Eligible studies include qualitative and quantitative research focusing on education, technical training, and assessment of FOI skills in clinical personnel with no obligate comparator. Outcomes should be assessable using Kirkpatrick's four levels of training evaluation. A systematic literature search will be conducted across multiple databases, including Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Cinahl, Scopus, and PubMed. Two independent authors will screen the studies, with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer. Extracted data will be analyzed descriptively, with a discussion on potential biases in the included literature. The quality of the studies will be assessed using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results of this scoping review may serve as a foundation for educational recommendations. By synthesizing available evidence, this review aims to guide future research and policy recommendations for FOI skill acquisition and maintenance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\"69 4\",\"pages\":\"e70019\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11894585/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70019\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:柔性光学插管(FOI)是处理预期困难气道的首选技术,特别是在解剖因素使传统喉镜检查复杂化的清醒患者中。掌握这一程序需要技能,但缺乏关于培训和评估信息自由技能的证据的全面概述。关于技能获得和保留的教育策略和建议尚无基于证据的共识,因此突出了气道管理培训方面的重大差距。因此,我们的目标是评估目前关于信息自由培训和评估的证据,以供未来的教育建议。方法:该范围审查遵循系统和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明和PRISMA范围审查扩展指南。合格的研究包括定性和定量研究,重点关注临床人员的教育、技术培训和信息自由技能评估,没有强制性比较国。结果应该用柯克帕特里克的四级培训评估来评估。系统的文献检索将在多个数据库中进行,包括Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Cinahl, Scopus和PubMed。两位独立作者将对研究进行筛选,差异由第三位审稿人解决。提取的数据将进行描述性分析,并讨论纳入文献中的潜在偏差。研究的质量将使用医学教育研究研究质量工具(MERSQI)进行评估。讨论:范围审查的结果可以作为教育建议的基础。通过综合现有证据,本综述旨在指导未来关于信息自由技能获取和维持的研究和政策建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Training and assessment of skills in flexible optical intubation - Protocol of a scoping review.

Background: Flexible optical intubation (FOI) is the preferred technique for managing anticipated difficult airways, particularly in awake patients when anatomical factors complicate conventional laryngoscopy. Mastering the procedure requires skills, but a comprehensive overview of the evidence on training and assessment of FOI skills is lacking. There is no evidence-based consensus on educational strategies and recommendations for skill acquisition and retention, thus highlighting a significant gap in airway management training. Accordingly, we aim to assess the current evidence on training and assessment in FOI for future educational recommendations.

Methods: This scoping review adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement and the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews guideline. Eligible studies include qualitative and quantitative research focusing on education, technical training, and assessment of FOI skills in clinical personnel with no obligate comparator. Outcomes should be assessable using Kirkpatrick's four levels of training evaluation. A systematic literature search will be conducted across multiple databases, including Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Cinahl, Scopus, and PubMed. Two independent authors will screen the studies, with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer. Extracted data will be analyzed descriptively, with a discussion on potential biases in the included literature. The quality of the studies will be assessed using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI).

Discussion: The results of this scoping review may serve as a foundation for educational recommendations. By synthesizing available evidence, this review aims to guide future research and policy recommendations for FOI skill acquisition and maintenance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信