为残疾人提供临床预防服务的卫生保健服务:系统综述。

IF 19.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
David I Buckley, Frances Hsu, Tracy Dana, Keeley Blackie, Rebecca Holmes, Peggy Nygren, Willi Horner-Johnson, Christina Nicolaidis, Roger Chou
{"title":"为残疾人提供临床预防服务的卫生保健服务:系统综述。","authors":"David I Buckley, Frances Hsu, Tracy Dana, Keeley Blackie, Rebecca Holmes, Peggy Nygren, Willi Horner-Johnson, Christina Nicolaidis, Roger Chou","doi":"10.7326/ANNALS-24-02446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with disabilities are less likely than the general population to receive clinical preventive services.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To summarize barriers to and facilitators of receipt of preventive services and effectiveness of interventions to improve receipt of preventive services among people with disabilities.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Five electronic databases through September 2024.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Dual independent screening of abstracts and full texts for 20 recommended preventive services.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Single reviewer, with a second reviewer verifying accuracy.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Among 11 586 references, 74 studies were included (60 on barriers and facilitators, 16 on interventions, and 2 on both barriers/facilitators and interventions). Most evidence was on screening for breast (<i>n</i> = 48) and cervical (<i>n</i> = 33) cancer. Barriers to and facilitators of breast and cervical cancer screening spanned all disability types and across environment, individual, provider, and health care levels. Six randomized controlled trials studied educational interventions for people with physical disabilities (<i>n</i> = 2); cognitive, intellectual, or developmental disabilities (<i>n</i> = 2); sensory disabilities (<i>n</i> = 1); and serious mental illness (<i>n</i> = 1), with mixed findings on effectiveness for different preventive services. Evidence on specific components or harms of interventions was limited.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>High methodological or clinical heterogeneity and limited data for most preventive services and disability types.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Barriers and facilitators for people with disabilities are described for breast and cervical cancer screening at the environment, individual, provider, and health care levels. Randomized studies on general educational interventions target the patient, the caregiver, and providers of people with specific disabilities. Research is needed on interventions that address barriers to and facilitators of receipt of preventive services for people with disabilities.</p><p><strong>Primary funding source: </strong>Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (Protocol registered at https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/people-with-disabilities/protocol).</p>","PeriodicalId":7932,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":19.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health Care Delivery of Clinical Preventive Services for People With Disabilities : <b>A Systematic Review</b>.\",\"authors\":\"David I Buckley, Frances Hsu, Tracy Dana, Keeley Blackie, Rebecca Holmes, Peggy Nygren, Willi Horner-Johnson, Christina Nicolaidis, Roger Chou\",\"doi\":\"10.7326/ANNALS-24-02446\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with disabilities are less likely than the general population to receive clinical preventive services.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To summarize barriers to and facilitators of receipt of preventive services and effectiveness of interventions to improve receipt of preventive services among people with disabilities.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Five electronic databases through September 2024.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Dual independent screening of abstracts and full texts for 20 recommended preventive services.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Single reviewer, with a second reviewer verifying accuracy.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Among 11 586 references, 74 studies were included (60 on barriers and facilitators, 16 on interventions, and 2 on both barriers/facilitators and interventions). Most evidence was on screening for breast (<i>n</i> = 48) and cervical (<i>n</i> = 33) cancer. Barriers to and facilitators of breast and cervical cancer screening spanned all disability types and across environment, individual, provider, and health care levels. Six randomized controlled trials studied educational interventions for people with physical disabilities (<i>n</i> = 2); cognitive, intellectual, or developmental disabilities (<i>n</i> = 2); sensory disabilities (<i>n</i> = 1); and serious mental illness (<i>n</i> = 1), with mixed findings on effectiveness for different preventive services. Evidence on specific components or harms of interventions was limited.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>High methodological or clinical heterogeneity and limited data for most preventive services and disability types.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Barriers and facilitators for people with disabilities are described for breast and cervical cancer screening at the environment, individual, provider, and health care levels. Randomized studies on general educational interventions target the patient, the caregiver, and providers of people with specific disabilities. Research is needed on interventions that address barriers to and facilitators of receipt of preventive services for people with disabilities.</p><p><strong>Primary funding source: </strong>Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (Protocol registered at https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/people-with-disabilities/protocol).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":19.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7326/ANNALS-24-02446\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7326/ANNALS-24-02446","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与一般人群相比,残疾人接受临床预防服务的可能性较小。目的:总结接受预防性服务的障碍和促进因素,以及改善残疾人接受预防性服务的干预措施的有效性。数据来源:截至2024年9月的五个电子数据库。研究选择:对20种推荐的预防服务的摘要和全文进行双重独立筛选。数据提取:单一审稿人,第二审稿人验证准确性。数据综合:在11 586篇文献中,纳入了74项研究(60项关于障碍和促进因素,16项关于干预措施,2项关于障碍/促进因素和干预措施)。大多数证据是关于乳腺癌(n = 48)和宫颈癌(n = 33)的筛查。乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查的障碍和促进因素涉及所有残疾类型,并涉及环境、个人、提供者和卫生保健水平。6项随机对照试验研究了对身体残疾者的教育干预(n = 2);认知、智力或发育障碍(n = 2);感觉障碍(n = 1);严重精神疾病(n = 1),不同预防服务的有效性发现不一。关于干预措施的具体组成部分或危害的证据有限。局限性:方法或临床异质性高,大多数预防服务和残疾类型的数据有限。结论:在环境、个人、提供者和卫生保健水平上描述了残疾人进行乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查的障碍和促进因素。一般教育干预的随机研究的目标是患者、护理者和特殊残疾人的提供者。需要对干预措施进行研究,以解决残疾人获得预防性服务的障碍和促进因素。主要资金来源:医疗保健研究和质量局。(议定书注册网址:https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/people-with-disabilities/protocol)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health Care Delivery of Clinical Preventive Services for People With Disabilities : A Systematic Review.

Background: People with disabilities are less likely than the general population to receive clinical preventive services.

Purpose: To summarize barriers to and facilitators of receipt of preventive services and effectiveness of interventions to improve receipt of preventive services among people with disabilities.

Data sources: Five electronic databases through September 2024.

Study selection: Dual independent screening of abstracts and full texts for 20 recommended preventive services.

Data extraction: Single reviewer, with a second reviewer verifying accuracy.

Data synthesis: Among 11 586 references, 74 studies were included (60 on barriers and facilitators, 16 on interventions, and 2 on both barriers/facilitators and interventions). Most evidence was on screening for breast (n = 48) and cervical (n = 33) cancer. Barriers to and facilitators of breast and cervical cancer screening spanned all disability types and across environment, individual, provider, and health care levels. Six randomized controlled trials studied educational interventions for people with physical disabilities (n = 2); cognitive, intellectual, or developmental disabilities (n = 2); sensory disabilities (n = 1); and serious mental illness (n = 1), with mixed findings on effectiveness for different preventive services. Evidence on specific components or harms of interventions was limited.

Limitations: High methodological or clinical heterogeneity and limited data for most preventive services and disability types.

Conclusion: Barriers and facilitators for people with disabilities are described for breast and cervical cancer screening at the environment, individual, provider, and health care levels. Randomized studies on general educational interventions target the patient, the caregiver, and providers of people with specific disabilities. Research is needed on interventions that address barriers to and facilitators of receipt of preventive services for people with disabilities.

Primary funding source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (Protocol registered at https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/people-with-disabilities/protocol).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Internal Medicine
Annals of Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
23.90
自引率
1.80%
发文量
1136
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians (ACP), Annals of Internal Medicine is the premier internal medicine journal. Annals of Internal Medicine’s mission is to promote excellence in medicine, enable physicians and other health care professionals to be well informed members of the medical community and society, advance standards in the conduct and reporting of medical research, and contribute to improving the health of people worldwide. To achieve this mission, the journal publishes a wide variety of original research, review articles, practice guidelines, and commentary relevant to clinical practice, health care delivery, public health, health care policy, medical education, ethics, and research methodology. In addition, the journal publishes personal narratives that convey the feeling and the art of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信