确定急诊医学项目主任在进入住院医师时对能力的期望:弥合与美国医学院协会核心可信赖专业活动的距离

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Holly A. Caretta-Weyer MD, MHPE, Yoon Soo Park PhD, Ara Tekian PhD, MHPE, Stefanie S. Sebok-Syer PhD
{"title":"确定急诊医学项目主任在进入住院医师时对能力的期望:弥合与美国医学院协会核心可信赖专业活动的距离","authors":"Holly A. Caretta-Weyer MD, MHPE,&nbsp;Yoon Soo Park PhD,&nbsp;Ara Tekian PhD, MHPE,&nbsp;Stefanie S. Sebok-Syer PhD","doi":"10.1002/aet2.70024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Residency program directors (PDs) frequently describe students as unprepared for the patient care responsibilities expected of them upon entry into residency. The Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) developed the Core Entrustable Professional Activities (Core EPAs) to address this concern by defining 13 tasks students should be able to do with minimal supervision upon graduation. However, the Core EPAs remain difficult for PDs to use due to their breadth and lack of granularity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Using Delphi consensus methodology, we identified granular observable practice activities (OPAs) that PDs expect of entering interns derived from the Core EPAs. Twelve emergency medicine education experts drafted OPAs based on the Core EPAs and their associated core functions described in one-page schematics. A separate group of 12 PDs underwent three rounds of voting, and consensus for inclusion was set at 70%. Thematic analysis of comments discussing votes was performed using an inductive approach.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 321 OPAs were drafted and 127 adopted as expectations for entering interns based on the Core EPAs. The adopted OPAs were all general expectations; none were specialty-specific. Four main themes were identified from the comments: Schools are not responsible for specialty-specific training, PDs do not fully trust schools’ assessments, supervision expectations of graduates should be lowered for higher-order EPAs, and the context in which the student performs a task and its associated complexity matter greatly in entrustment decisions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>PDs agree with the generalist focus of the AAMC Core EPAs and feel strongly that specialty training should be left to residency programs. They also have mechanisms in place to verify entrustment within their local context. Transparency in assessment and summative entrustment processes in UME may unify expectations. Finally, the granularity of OPAs may aid in a post-Match handover to further operationalize the EPAs and optimize the UME-to-GME transition.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying emergency medicine program directors’ expectations of competence upon entry into residency: Bridging the distance from the Association of American Medical Colleges Core Entrustable Professional Activities\",\"authors\":\"Holly A. Caretta-Weyer MD, MHPE,&nbsp;Yoon Soo Park PhD,&nbsp;Ara Tekian PhD, MHPE,&nbsp;Stefanie S. Sebok-Syer PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aet2.70024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Residency program directors (PDs) frequently describe students as unprepared for the patient care responsibilities expected of them upon entry into residency. The Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) developed the Core Entrustable Professional Activities (Core EPAs) to address this concern by defining 13 tasks students should be able to do with minimal supervision upon graduation. However, the Core EPAs remain difficult for PDs to use due to their breadth and lack of granularity.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Using Delphi consensus methodology, we identified granular observable practice activities (OPAs) that PDs expect of entering interns derived from the Core EPAs. Twelve emergency medicine education experts drafted OPAs based on the Core EPAs and their associated core functions described in one-page schematics. A separate group of 12 PDs underwent three rounds of voting, and consensus for inclusion was set at 70%. Thematic analysis of comments discussing votes was performed using an inductive approach.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 321 OPAs were drafted and 127 adopted as expectations for entering interns based on the Core EPAs. The adopted OPAs were all general expectations; none were specialty-specific. Four main themes were identified from the comments: Schools are not responsible for specialty-specific training, PDs do not fully trust schools’ assessments, supervision expectations of graduates should be lowered for higher-order EPAs, and the context in which the student performs a task and its associated complexity matter greatly in entrustment decisions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>PDs agree with the generalist focus of the AAMC Core EPAs and feel strongly that specialty training should be left to residency programs. They also have mechanisms in place to verify entrustment within their local context. Transparency in assessment and summative entrustment processes in UME may unify expectations. Finally, the granularity of OPAs may aid in a post-Match handover to further operationalize the EPAs and optimize the UME-to-GME transition.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.70024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.70024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

住院医师项目主任(pd)经常描述学生在进入住院医师时没有准备好承担病人护理责任。美国医学院协会(AAMC)制定了核心可信赖专业活动(Core EPAs)来解决这一问题,通过定义学生在毕业时应该能够在最少监督下完成的13项任务。然而,由于核心EPAs的广度和缺乏粒度,pd仍然很难使用它们。方法采用德尔菲共识方法,我们确定了pd期望进入实习生的可观察实践活动(OPAs),这些活动来自核心EPAs。12名急诊医学教育专家根据核心应急措施及其在一页示意图中描述的相关核心功能起草了应急措施。另一个由12名议员组成的小组经过三轮投票,70%的人同意加入。使用归纳方法对讨论投票的评论进行专题分析。结果根据核心工作计划,共起草了321份工作计划,127份工作计划被采纳为进入实习生的期望。通过的目标行动计划都是一般期望;没有一个是特殊的。从评论中确定了四个主要主题:学校不负责特定专业的培训,pd并不完全信任学校的评估,对毕业生的监督期望应该降低,以及学生执行任务的环境及其相关的复杂性在委托决策中非常重要。结论医师同意AAMC核心EPAs的通才重点,并强烈认为专科培训应留给住院医师项目。它们也有适当的机制来验证本地环境中的委托。在UME中,评估和总结性委托过程的透明度可能会统一人们的期望。最后,opa的粒度可以帮助在赛后切换中进一步操作epa并优化ume到gme的转换。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identifying emergency medicine program directors’ expectations of competence upon entry into residency: Bridging the distance from the Association of American Medical Colleges Core Entrustable Professional Activities

Background

Residency program directors (PDs) frequently describe students as unprepared for the patient care responsibilities expected of them upon entry into residency. The Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) developed the Core Entrustable Professional Activities (Core EPAs) to address this concern by defining 13 tasks students should be able to do with minimal supervision upon graduation. However, the Core EPAs remain difficult for PDs to use due to their breadth and lack of granularity.

Methods

Using Delphi consensus methodology, we identified granular observable practice activities (OPAs) that PDs expect of entering interns derived from the Core EPAs. Twelve emergency medicine education experts drafted OPAs based on the Core EPAs and their associated core functions described in one-page schematics. A separate group of 12 PDs underwent three rounds of voting, and consensus for inclusion was set at 70%. Thematic analysis of comments discussing votes was performed using an inductive approach.

Results

A total of 321 OPAs were drafted and 127 adopted as expectations for entering interns based on the Core EPAs. The adopted OPAs were all general expectations; none were specialty-specific. Four main themes were identified from the comments: Schools are not responsible for specialty-specific training, PDs do not fully trust schools’ assessments, supervision expectations of graduates should be lowered for higher-order EPAs, and the context in which the student performs a task and its associated complexity matter greatly in entrustment decisions.

Conclusions

PDs agree with the generalist focus of the AAMC Core EPAs and feel strongly that specialty training should be left to residency programs. They also have mechanisms in place to verify entrustment within their local context. Transparency in assessment and summative entrustment processes in UME may unify expectations. Finally, the granularity of OPAs may aid in a post-Match handover to further operationalize the EPAs and optimize the UME-to-GME transition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AEM Education and Training
AEM Education and Training Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信