Roy Huynh, Kevin Tree, Matthew Smith, Lily Builth-Snoad, Faisal Syed, Dean Fisher
{"title":"回顾性队列研究确定社会经济地位和医院距离对农村地区阑尾切除术阴性率的影响","authors":"Roy Huynh, Kevin Tree, Matthew Smith, Lily Builth-Snoad, Faisal Syed, Dean Fisher","doi":"10.1111/ajr.70026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The impact of socioeconomic status and distance to hospital on negative appendicectomy rates is unknown. These factors have been shown to be important predictors of health in a rural setting.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To determine whether socioeconomic status and road distance to hospital were risk factors for negative appendicectomy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective analysis of all appendicectomies at a large rural hospital in Australia between January 2018 and December 2022 was performed. Patients' data were extracted from electronic medical records. Regression modelling was performed to determine whether socioeconomic status and road distance to hospital were risk factors for negative appendicectomy. The surgical outcomes for negative and positive appendicectomies were compared.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 830 patients were included in our analysis, of which 106 (12.8%) had negative appendicectomy. The rate of negative appendicectomy was not significantly impacted by socioeconomic status (OR = 1.004, 95% CI 0.989–1.20, <i>p</i> = 0.583) or road distance to hospital (OR = 1, 95% CI 0.998–1.001, <i>p</i> = 0.635). There was no significant difference in complications and 30-day readmission rates between patients in the negative and positive appendicectomy groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In a rural setting, the risk of negative appendicectomy does not increase with lower socioeconomic status and longer road distance to hospital. This challenges the prevailing notion that rural surgeons have a lower threshold to operate on patients with lower socioeconomic status or who live further away from hospitals due to the perception that these patients have less access to healthcare.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55421,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Rural Health","volume":"33 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajr.70026","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective Cohort Study to Determine the Effect of Socioeconomic Status and Distance to Hospital on Negative Appendicectomy Rates in a Rural Setting\",\"authors\":\"Roy Huynh, Kevin Tree, Matthew Smith, Lily Builth-Snoad, Faisal Syed, Dean Fisher\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajr.70026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The impact of socioeconomic status and distance to hospital on negative appendicectomy rates is unknown. These factors have been shown to be important predictors of health in a rural setting.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To determine whether socioeconomic status and road distance to hospital were risk factors for negative appendicectomy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A retrospective analysis of all appendicectomies at a large rural hospital in Australia between January 2018 and December 2022 was performed. Patients' data were extracted from electronic medical records. Regression modelling was performed to determine whether socioeconomic status and road distance to hospital were risk factors for negative appendicectomy. The surgical outcomes for negative and positive appendicectomies were compared.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 830 patients were included in our analysis, of which 106 (12.8%) had negative appendicectomy. The rate of negative appendicectomy was not significantly impacted by socioeconomic status (OR = 1.004, 95% CI 0.989–1.20, <i>p</i> = 0.583) or road distance to hospital (OR = 1, 95% CI 0.998–1.001, <i>p</i> = 0.635). There was no significant difference in complications and 30-day readmission rates between patients in the negative and positive appendicectomy groups.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>In a rural setting, the risk of negative appendicectomy does not increase with lower socioeconomic status and longer road distance to hospital. This challenges the prevailing notion that rural surgeons have a lower threshold to operate on patients with lower socioeconomic status or who live further away from hospitals due to the perception that these patients have less access to healthcare.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Rural Health\",\"volume\":\"33 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajr.70026\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Rural Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajr.70026\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajr.70026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景社会经济地位和到医院的距离对阑尾切除阴性率的影响尚不清楚。这些因素已被证明是农村地区健康状况的重要预测因素。目的探讨社会经济状况和到医院的道路距离是否为阑尾切除术阴性的危险因素。方法回顾性分析2018年1月至2022年12月在澳大利亚一家大型农村医院进行的所有阑尾切除术。患者的数据是从电子病历中提取的。采用回归模型来确定社会经济地位和到医院的道路距离是否是阑尾切除术阴性的危险因素。比较阴性和阳性阑尾切除术的手术结果。结果共纳入830例患者,其中106例(12.8%)阑尾切除术阴性。社会经济地位(OR = 1.004, 95% CI 0.989-1.20, p = 0.583)和到医院的道路距离(OR = 1, 95% CI 0.998-1.001, p = 0.635)对阑尾切除阴性率没有显著影响。阑尾切除术阴性组和阳性组患者的并发症和30天再入院率无显著差异。结论在农村地区,阑尾切除阴性的风险不随社会经济地位的降低和到医院的路途距离的增加而增加。这挑战了一种普遍的观念,即农村外科医生对社会经济地位较低的患者或居住在远离医院的地方的患者进行手术的门槛较低,因为人们认为这些患者获得医疗保健的机会较少。
Retrospective Cohort Study to Determine the Effect of Socioeconomic Status and Distance to Hospital on Negative Appendicectomy Rates in a Rural Setting
Background
The impact of socioeconomic status and distance to hospital on negative appendicectomy rates is unknown. These factors have been shown to be important predictors of health in a rural setting.
Objective
To determine whether socioeconomic status and road distance to hospital were risk factors for negative appendicectomy.
Methods
A retrospective analysis of all appendicectomies at a large rural hospital in Australia between January 2018 and December 2022 was performed. Patients' data were extracted from electronic medical records. Regression modelling was performed to determine whether socioeconomic status and road distance to hospital were risk factors for negative appendicectomy. The surgical outcomes for negative and positive appendicectomies were compared.
Results
A total of 830 patients were included in our analysis, of which 106 (12.8%) had negative appendicectomy. The rate of negative appendicectomy was not significantly impacted by socioeconomic status (OR = 1.004, 95% CI 0.989–1.20, p = 0.583) or road distance to hospital (OR = 1, 95% CI 0.998–1.001, p = 0.635). There was no significant difference in complications and 30-day readmission rates between patients in the negative and positive appendicectomy groups.
Conclusions
In a rural setting, the risk of negative appendicectomy does not increase with lower socioeconomic status and longer road distance to hospital. This challenges the prevailing notion that rural surgeons have a lower threshold to operate on patients with lower socioeconomic status or who live further away from hospitals due to the perception that these patients have less access to healthcare.
期刊介绍:
The Australian Journal of Rural Health publishes articles in the field of rural health. It facilitates the formation of interdisciplinary networks, so that rural health professionals can form a cohesive group and work together for the advancement of rural practice, in all health disciplines. The Journal aims to establish a national and international reputation for the quality of its scholarly discourse and its value to rural health professionals. All articles, unless otherwise identified, are peer reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.