不同脑肿瘤组织型下额枕束神经放射学和形态学改变的定量评价:一项意大利多中心研究

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Roberto Altieri, Andrea Bianconi, Stefano Caneva, Giovanni Cirillo, Fabio Cofano, Sergio Corvino, Oreste de Divitiis, Giuseppe Maria Della Pepa, Ciro De Luca, Pietro Fiaschi, Gianluca Galieri, Diego Garbossa, Giuseppe La Rocca, Salvatore Marino, Edoardo Mazzucchi, Grazia Menna, Antonio Mezzogiorno, Alberto Morello, Alessandro Olivi, Michele Papa, Daniela Pacella, Rosellina Russo, Giovanni Sabatino, Giovanna Sepe, Assunta Virtuoso, Giovanni Vitale, Rocco Vitale, Gianluigi Zona, Manlio Barbarisi
{"title":"不同脑肿瘤组织型下额枕束神经放射学和形态学改变的定量评价:一项意大利多中心研究","authors":"Roberto Altieri,&nbsp;Andrea Bianconi,&nbsp;Stefano Caneva,&nbsp;Giovanni Cirillo,&nbsp;Fabio Cofano,&nbsp;Sergio Corvino,&nbsp;Oreste de Divitiis,&nbsp;Giuseppe Maria Della Pepa,&nbsp;Ciro De Luca,&nbsp;Pietro Fiaschi,&nbsp;Gianluca Galieri,&nbsp;Diego Garbossa,&nbsp;Giuseppe La Rocca,&nbsp;Salvatore Marino,&nbsp;Edoardo Mazzucchi,&nbsp;Grazia Menna,&nbsp;Antonio Mezzogiorno,&nbsp;Alberto Morello,&nbsp;Alessandro Olivi,&nbsp;Michele Papa,&nbsp;Daniela Pacella,&nbsp;Rosellina Russo,&nbsp;Giovanni Sabatino,&nbsp;Giovanna Sepe,&nbsp;Assunta Virtuoso,&nbsp;Giovanni Vitale,&nbsp;Rocco Vitale,&nbsp;Gianluigi Zona,&nbsp;Manlio Barbarisi","doi":"10.1007/s00701-025-06488-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Inferior Fronto-Occipital Fascicle (IFOF) is a multitasking connection bundle essential for communication and high level mentalization. The aim of the present study was to quantitatively assess its radiological-anatomical-morphometric modifications according to different brain tumor histotype.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective multicentric Italian study was conducted. IFOF reconstructions were calculated for both hemispheres for each patient diagnosed with Glioblastoma (GBM), Low Grade Glioma (LGG), Brain Metastasis and Meningioma using Elements Fibertracking software (Brainlab AG). A 3D object of each fascicle was evaluated for volume, average fractional anisotropy (FA) and length. The cerebral healthy hemisphere was compared to the pathological contralateral in different tumor histotype.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>1294 patients were evaluated. 156 met the inclusion criteria. We found a significant difference between healthy hemisphere and the contralateral for IFOF mean length and volume (<i>p</i>-value &lt; 0.001). Considering GBM subgroup, Student’s t-test confirmed the results. In LGG subgroup, there was significant difference between the 2 hemispheres for IFOF mean length, mean FA and volume (respectively <i>p</i>-value 0.011; <i>p</i>-value 0.021, <i>p</i>-value &lt; 0.001). In patients affected by brain metastasis (18) Student’s t-test showed a significant difference for FA and volume (<i>p</i>-value 0.003 and 0.02 respectively). No differences were found in patients affected by meningiomas.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The careful preoperative neuroradiological evaluation of the brain-tumor interface is indispensable to plan a tailored surgical strategy and perform a safe and effective surgical technique. It depends on the tumor histology and pattern of growth. GBM have a mixed component, with the solid enhancing nodule which accounts for IFOF displacement and the peritumoral area which accounts for an infiltrative/destructive effect on the fascicle. LGG determine a prevalent infiltrative pattern. Metastases determine an IFOF dislocation due to peritumoral oedema. Meningiomas do not impact on WM anatomy.\n</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7370,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neurochirurgica","volume":"167 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00701-025-06488-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative evaluation of neuroradiological and morphometric alteration of inferior Fronto-Occipital Fascicle across different brain tumor histotype: an Italian multicentric study\",\"authors\":\"Roberto Altieri,&nbsp;Andrea Bianconi,&nbsp;Stefano Caneva,&nbsp;Giovanni Cirillo,&nbsp;Fabio Cofano,&nbsp;Sergio Corvino,&nbsp;Oreste de Divitiis,&nbsp;Giuseppe Maria Della Pepa,&nbsp;Ciro De Luca,&nbsp;Pietro Fiaschi,&nbsp;Gianluca Galieri,&nbsp;Diego Garbossa,&nbsp;Giuseppe La Rocca,&nbsp;Salvatore Marino,&nbsp;Edoardo Mazzucchi,&nbsp;Grazia Menna,&nbsp;Antonio Mezzogiorno,&nbsp;Alberto Morello,&nbsp;Alessandro Olivi,&nbsp;Michele Papa,&nbsp;Daniela Pacella,&nbsp;Rosellina Russo,&nbsp;Giovanni Sabatino,&nbsp;Giovanna Sepe,&nbsp;Assunta Virtuoso,&nbsp;Giovanni Vitale,&nbsp;Rocco Vitale,&nbsp;Gianluigi Zona,&nbsp;Manlio Barbarisi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00701-025-06488-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Inferior Fronto-Occipital Fascicle (IFOF) is a multitasking connection bundle essential for communication and high level mentalization. The aim of the present study was to quantitatively assess its radiological-anatomical-morphometric modifications according to different brain tumor histotype.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective multicentric Italian study was conducted. IFOF reconstructions were calculated for both hemispheres for each patient diagnosed with Glioblastoma (GBM), Low Grade Glioma (LGG), Brain Metastasis and Meningioma using Elements Fibertracking software (Brainlab AG). A 3D object of each fascicle was evaluated for volume, average fractional anisotropy (FA) and length. The cerebral healthy hemisphere was compared to the pathological contralateral in different tumor histotype.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>1294 patients were evaluated. 156 met the inclusion criteria. We found a significant difference between healthy hemisphere and the contralateral for IFOF mean length and volume (<i>p</i>-value &lt; 0.001). Considering GBM subgroup, Student’s t-test confirmed the results. In LGG subgroup, there was significant difference between the 2 hemispheres for IFOF mean length, mean FA and volume (respectively <i>p</i>-value 0.011; <i>p</i>-value 0.021, <i>p</i>-value &lt; 0.001). In patients affected by brain metastasis (18) Student’s t-test showed a significant difference for FA and volume (<i>p</i>-value 0.003 and 0.02 respectively). No differences were found in patients affected by meningiomas.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The careful preoperative neuroradiological evaluation of the brain-tumor interface is indispensable to plan a tailored surgical strategy and perform a safe and effective surgical technique. It depends on the tumor histology and pattern of growth. GBM have a mixed component, with the solid enhancing nodule which accounts for IFOF displacement and the peritumoral area which accounts for an infiltrative/destructive effect on the fascicle. LGG determine a prevalent infiltrative pattern. Metastases determine an IFOF dislocation due to peritumoral oedema. Meningiomas do not impact on WM anatomy.\\n</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Neurochirurgica\",\"volume\":\"167 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00701-025-06488-6.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Neurochirurgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00701-025-06488-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neurochirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00701-025-06488-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

额枕下神经束(IFOF)是一个多任务连接束,对沟通和高水平的心智化至关重要。本研究的目的是根据不同的脑肿瘤组织型定量评估其放射学-解剖学-形态学的改变。方法采用意大利多中心回顾性研究。使用Elements Fibertracking软件(Brainlab AG)计算每个诊断为胶质母细胞瘤(GBM),低级别胶质瘤(LGG),脑转移和脑膜瘤的患者的两个半球的IFOF重建。评估每个束的三维物体的体积,平均分数各向异性(FA)和长度。对不同肿瘤组织类型的大脑健康半球与病理对侧进行比较。结果共评估1294例患者。156例符合纳入标准。我们发现健康半球和对侧半球间IFOF的平均长度和体积有显著差异(p值<; 0.001)。考虑到GBM亚组,Student’s t检验证实了结果。在LGG亚组中,两个半球间IFOF平均长度、平均FA和体积差异有统计学意义(p值分别为0.011;p值0.021,p值<; 0.001)。在脑转移患者中(18),学生t检验显示FA和体积有显著差异(p值分别为0.003和0.02)。在脑膜瘤患者中没有发现差异。结论术前对脑肿瘤交界面进行细致的神经影像学评估,对制定有针对性的手术策略和实施安全有效的手术技术至关重要。这取决于肿瘤的组织学和生长方式。GBM具有混合成分,其中实体增强结节导致IFOF移位,肿瘤周围区域导致对神经束的浸润/破坏作用。LGG确定了一个普遍的渗透模式。由于肿瘤周围水肿,转移确定IFOF脱位。脑膜瘤不影响WM解剖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantitative evaluation of neuroradiological and morphometric alteration of inferior Fronto-Occipital Fascicle across different brain tumor histotype: an Italian multicentric study

Background

Inferior Fronto-Occipital Fascicle (IFOF) is a multitasking connection bundle essential for communication and high level mentalization. The aim of the present study was to quantitatively assess its radiological-anatomical-morphometric modifications according to different brain tumor histotype.

Methods

A retrospective multicentric Italian study was conducted. IFOF reconstructions were calculated for both hemispheres for each patient diagnosed with Glioblastoma (GBM), Low Grade Glioma (LGG), Brain Metastasis and Meningioma using Elements Fibertracking software (Brainlab AG). A 3D object of each fascicle was evaluated for volume, average fractional anisotropy (FA) and length. The cerebral healthy hemisphere was compared to the pathological contralateral in different tumor histotype.

Results

1294 patients were evaluated. 156 met the inclusion criteria. We found a significant difference between healthy hemisphere and the contralateral for IFOF mean length and volume (p-value < 0.001). Considering GBM subgroup, Student’s t-test confirmed the results. In LGG subgroup, there was significant difference between the 2 hemispheres for IFOF mean length, mean FA and volume (respectively p-value 0.011; p-value 0.021, p-value < 0.001). In patients affected by brain metastasis (18) Student’s t-test showed a significant difference for FA and volume (p-value 0.003 and 0.02 respectively). No differences were found in patients affected by meningiomas.

Conclusions

The careful preoperative neuroradiological evaluation of the brain-tumor interface is indispensable to plan a tailored surgical strategy and perform a safe and effective surgical technique. It depends on the tumor histology and pattern of growth. GBM have a mixed component, with the solid enhancing nodule which accounts for IFOF displacement and the peritumoral area which accounts for an infiltrative/destructive effect on the fascicle. LGG determine a prevalent infiltrative pattern. Metastases determine an IFOF dislocation due to peritumoral oedema. Meningiomas do not impact on WM anatomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Neurochirurgica
Acta Neurochirurgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The journal "Acta Neurochirurgica" publishes only original papers useful both to research and clinical work. Papers should deal with clinical neurosurgery - diagnosis and diagnostic techniques, operative surgery and results, postoperative treatment - or with research work in neuroscience if the underlying questions or the results are of neurosurgical interest. Reports on congresses are given in brief accounts. As official organ of the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies the journal publishes all announcements of the E.A.N.S. and reports on the activities of its member societies. Only contributions written in English will be accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信