胸间和胸锯肌平面阻滞在乳房手术中的有效性:一项随机对照试验

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Aline Albi-Feldzer , Guillaume Gayraud , Sylvain Dureau , Marion Augé , Adrien Lemoine , Julien Raft
{"title":"胸间和胸锯肌平面阻滞在乳房手术中的有效性:一项随机对照试验","authors":"Aline Albi-Feldzer ,&nbsp;Guillaume Gayraud ,&nbsp;Sylvain Dureau ,&nbsp;Marion Augé ,&nbsp;Adrien Lemoine ,&nbsp;Julien Raft","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Interpectoral and pectoserratus plane blocks are fascial plane blocks that are used during anterolateral superficial chest wall surgery. However, the true analgesic efficacy of these blocks in oncological breast surgery is unclear because of the diversity of breast-surgery procedures. The primary hypothesis of this study was that these blocks reduce the incidence of acute pain.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This double-blinded, multicenter, randomized controlled study included 185 patients. Patients were randomized equally into two groups at a 1:1 ratio according to the type of interfascial injection received (ropivacaine vs. saline). The incidence of analgesic rescue during the first 3 postoperative hours was the primary outcome measure.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The authors enrolled 182 women. The analgesic rescue incidence was lower in the ropivacaine group. Interpectoral and pectoserratus plane blocks with ropivacaine had an incidence of analgesic rescue of 43 % (<em>n</em> = 37) versus 61 % (<em>n</em> = 50) in patients given the placebo (relative risk = 0.70; 95 % CI = 0.52 to 0.94; <em>p</em> = 0.02). Interpectoral and pectoserratus plane blocks with ropivacaine are associated with a 30 % reduction in the use of rescue analgesics.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Interpectoral and pectoserratus plane blocks reduced the incidence of analgesic rescue and reduced the postoperative pain score to the mild range after oncological breast-conserving surgery and sentinel lymph-node biopsy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 111805"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficiency of interpectoral and pectoserratus plane blocks for breast surgery: A randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Aline Albi-Feldzer ,&nbsp;Guillaume Gayraud ,&nbsp;Sylvain Dureau ,&nbsp;Marion Augé ,&nbsp;Adrien Lemoine ,&nbsp;Julien Raft\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111805\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Interpectoral and pectoserratus plane blocks are fascial plane blocks that are used during anterolateral superficial chest wall surgery. However, the true analgesic efficacy of these blocks in oncological breast surgery is unclear because of the diversity of breast-surgery procedures. The primary hypothesis of this study was that these blocks reduce the incidence of acute pain.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This double-blinded, multicenter, randomized controlled study included 185 patients. Patients were randomized equally into two groups at a 1:1 ratio according to the type of interfascial injection received (ropivacaine vs. saline). The incidence of analgesic rescue during the first 3 postoperative hours was the primary outcome measure.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The authors enrolled 182 women. The analgesic rescue incidence was lower in the ropivacaine group. Interpectoral and pectoserratus plane blocks with ropivacaine had an incidence of analgesic rescue of 43 % (<em>n</em> = 37) versus 61 % (<em>n</em> = 50) in patients given the placebo (relative risk = 0.70; 95 % CI = 0.52 to 0.94; <em>p</em> = 0.02). Interpectoral and pectoserratus plane blocks with ropivacaine are associated with a 30 % reduction in the use of rescue analgesics.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Interpectoral and pectoserratus plane blocks reduced the incidence of analgesic rescue and reduced the postoperative pain score to the mild range after oncological breast-conserving surgery and sentinel lymph-node biopsy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia\",\"volume\":\"103 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111805\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818025000650\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818025000650","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胸间肌和胸锯肌平面阻滞是筋膜平面阻滞,用于前外侧胸壁浅壁手术。然而,由于乳腺手术程序的多样性,这些阻滞在乳腺肿瘤手术中的真正镇痛效果尚不清楚。本研究的主要假设是这些阻滞减少了急性疼痛的发生率。方法185例患者进行双盲、多中心、随机对照研究。根据所接受的筋膜间注射类型(罗哌卡因vs生理盐水),将患者按1:1的比例随机分为两组。术后前3小时镇痛抢救的发生率是主要观察指标。结果作者招募了182名女性。罗哌卡因组镇痛抢救发生率较低。罗哌卡因胸间肌和胸锯肌平面阻滞的镇痛挽救发生率为43% (n = 37),而安慰剂组为61% (n = 50)(相对危险度= 0.70;95% CI = 0.52 ~ 0.94;p = 0.02)。应用罗哌卡因阻滞胸间肌和胸锯肌平面可减少30%的救助性镇痛药的使用。结论胸肌和胸锯肌平面阻滞减少了肿瘤保乳手术和前哨淋巴结活检术后镇痛抢救的发生率,并将术后疼痛评分降至轻度范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Efficiency of interpectoral and pectoserratus plane blocks for breast surgery: A randomized controlled trial

Efficiency of interpectoral and pectoserratus plane blocks for breast surgery: A randomized controlled trial

Background

Interpectoral and pectoserratus plane blocks are fascial plane blocks that are used during anterolateral superficial chest wall surgery. However, the true analgesic efficacy of these blocks in oncological breast surgery is unclear because of the diversity of breast-surgery procedures. The primary hypothesis of this study was that these blocks reduce the incidence of acute pain.

Methods

This double-blinded, multicenter, randomized controlled study included 185 patients. Patients were randomized equally into two groups at a 1:1 ratio according to the type of interfascial injection received (ropivacaine vs. saline). The incidence of analgesic rescue during the first 3 postoperative hours was the primary outcome measure.

Results

The authors enrolled 182 women. The analgesic rescue incidence was lower in the ropivacaine group. Interpectoral and pectoserratus plane blocks with ropivacaine had an incidence of analgesic rescue of 43 % (n = 37) versus 61 % (n = 50) in patients given the placebo (relative risk = 0.70; 95 % CI = 0.52 to 0.94; p = 0.02). Interpectoral and pectoserratus plane blocks with ropivacaine are associated with a 30 % reduction in the use of rescue analgesics.

Conclusions

Interpectoral and pectoserratus plane blocks reduced the incidence of analgesic rescue and reduced the postoperative pain score to the mild range after oncological breast-conserving surgery and sentinel lymph-node biopsy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
346
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained. The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信