矿物溶解过程中硅酸盐熔体中扩散Mg同位素分馏

IF 3.6 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Youxue Zhang (张有学), Bobo Bai (白博博)
{"title":"矿物溶解过程中硅酸盐熔体中扩散Mg同位素分馏","authors":"Youxue Zhang (张有学),&nbsp;Bobo Bai (白博博)","doi":"10.1016/j.chemgeo.2025.122720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Diffusion can generate much larger isotope fractionation than equilibrium isotope fractionation. Previous experimental studies on diffusive isotope fractionation have used diffusion couple experiments. Here, we report a study investigating diffusive Mg isotope fractionation in melts during mineral dissolution experiments in andesite, basalt, and Fe-free “basalt”. The goal of the study is to (a) use mineral dissolution experiments to determine the empirical β factor for diffusive isotope fractionation in melts, and (b) evaluate the variability of β for diffusive Mg isotope fractionation because literature data showed a range of 0.045 to 0.10. We first derive the analytical solution for diffusive isotope fractionation in melts during mineral dissolution and examine the dependence of the interface isotope ratio on other parameters and the behavior of the isotope diffusion profile. We then report SIMS measurement of Mg isotope diffusion profiles during anorthite dissolution in basalt and olivine dissolution in andesite. Mg isotope diffusion profiles during anorthite dissolution are as expected and can be modeled well leading to β<sub>Mg</sub> of 0.052 ± 0.011 in a mid-ocean ridge basalt and 0.077 ± 0.012 in an FeO-free “basalt”, but the δ<sup>26</sup>Mg profile during an olivine dissolution experiment in andesite is not as expected. We suspected that the latter was due to significant matrix effect on analyzed δ<sup>26</sup>Mg values because of the large compositional variation along the diffusion profile. To examine this effect, glass standards with compositions similar to those in points along the diffusion profile were synthesized using MgO powders from the same bottle (meaning the same Mg isotope ratio). The matrix effect is indeed significant. After correcting for it, the diffusion profile of Mg isotope ratios is as expected and can be modeled well with β<sub>Mg</sub> of 0.074 ± 0.002.</div><div>Combining the new result with previous results, the β<sub>Mg</sub> value for diffusive isotope fractionation in andesite to basalt is 0.052 to 0.077 based on anorthite and olivine dissolution experiments, which lies within literature values. The range of β<sub>Mg</sub> values can be reconciled using diffusion mechanisms inferred from multicomponent diffusion studies. The method developed in this study can be applied to investigate diffusive isotope fractionation in other mineral dissolution studies. Furthermore, diffusive isotope fractionation in melt during rapid phenocryst growth in natural basalt may also be measurable under favorable conditions, potentially opening a new perspective in understanding crystal growth and fractionation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9847,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Geology","volume":"681 ","pages":"Article 122720"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diffusive Mg isotope fractionation in silicate melts during mineral dissolution\",\"authors\":\"Youxue Zhang (张有学),&nbsp;Bobo Bai (白博博)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chemgeo.2025.122720\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Diffusion can generate much larger isotope fractionation than equilibrium isotope fractionation. Previous experimental studies on diffusive isotope fractionation have used diffusion couple experiments. Here, we report a study investigating diffusive Mg isotope fractionation in melts during mineral dissolution experiments in andesite, basalt, and Fe-free “basalt”. The goal of the study is to (a) use mineral dissolution experiments to determine the empirical β factor for diffusive isotope fractionation in melts, and (b) evaluate the variability of β for diffusive Mg isotope fractionation because literature data showed a range of 0.045 to 0.10. We first derive the analytical solution for diffusive isotope fractionation in melts during mineral dissolution and examine the dependence of the interface isotope ratio on other parameters and the behavior of the isotope diffusion profile. We then report SIMS measurement of Mg isotope diffusion profiles during anorthite dissolution in basalt and olivine dissolution in andesite. Mg isotope diffusion profiles during anorthite dissolution are as expected and can be modeled well leading to β<sub>Mg</sub> of 0.052 ± 0.011 in a mid-ocean ridge basalt and 0.077 ± 0.012 in an FeO-free “basalt”, but the δ<sup>26</sup>Mg profile during an olivine dissolution experiment in andesite is not as expected. We suspected that the latter was due to significant matrix effect on analyzed δ<sup>26</sup>Mg values because of the large compositional variation along the diffusion profile. To examine this effect, glass standards with compositions similar to those in points along the diffusion profile were synthesized using MgO powders from the same bottle (meaning the same Mg isotope ratio). The matrix effect is indeed significant. After correcting for it, the diffusion profile of Mg isotope ratios is as expected and can be modeled well with β<sub>Mg</sub> of 0.074 ± 0.002.</div><div>Combining the new result with previous results, the β<sub>Mg</sub> value for diffusive isotope fractionation in andesite to basalt is 0.052 to 0.077 based on anorthite and olivine dissolution experiments, which lies within literature values. The range of β<sub>Mg</sub> values can be reconciled using diffusion mechanisms inferred from multicomponent diffusion studies. The method developed in this study can be applied to investigate diffusive isotope fractionation in other mineral dissolution studies. Furthermore, diffusive isotope fractionation in melt during rapid phenocryst growth in natural basalt may also be measurable under favorable conditions, potentially opening a new perspective in understanding crystal growth and fractionation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemical Geology\",\"volume\":\"681 \",\"pages\":\"Article 122720\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemical Geology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000925412500110X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000925412500110X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

扩散能产生比平衡同位素分馏大得多的同位素分馏。以往的同位素扩散分馏实验研究都是采用扩散偶实验。在这里,我们报告了一项研究,在安山岩、玄武岩和无铁“玄武岩”的矿物溶解实验中,研究了熔体中扩散的Mg同位素分馏。本研究的目的是(a)利用矿物溶解实验来确定熔体中扩散同位素分馏的经验β因子,以及(b)评估扩散Mg同位素分馏的β因子的变异性,因为文献数据显示其范围为0.045至0.10。我们首先推导了矿物溶解过程中熔体中扩散同位素分馏的解析解,并研究了界面同位素比对其他参数和同位素扩散剖面行为的依赖。然后,我们报道了玄武岩中钙长石溶蚀和安山岩中橄榄石溶蚀过程中Mg同位素扩散剖面的SIMS测量。在洋中脊玄武岩中,Mg同位素扩散曲线为0.052±0.011,在无feo的“玄武岩”中,Mg同位素扩散曲线为0.077±0.012,而在安山岩中橄榄石溶蚀实验中,Mg同位素扩散曲线为δ26Mg。我们怀疑后者是由于基体对分析的δ26Mg值的显著影响,因为沿扩散剖面的成分变化很大。为了检验这种影响,用来自同一瓶的MgO粉末(意味着相同的Mg同位素比率)合成了成分与扩散剖面上各点相似的玻璃标准品。矩阵效应确实很重要。校正后,Mg同位素比值的扩散曲线符合预期,βMg = 0.074±0.002可以很好地模拟。结合前人研究结果,安山岩-玄武岩扩散同位素分馏的βMg值为0.052 ~ 0.077,与文献值一致。βMg值的范围可以用从多组分扩散研究中推断的扩散机制来调和。本研究开发的方法可以应用于其他矿物溶解研究中的扩散同位素分馏。此外,在有利条件下,也可以测量天然玄武岩斑晶快速生长过程中熔体中的扩散同位素分馏,这可能为理解晶体生长和分馏开辟新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diffusive Mg isotope fractionation in silicate melts during mineral dissolution
Diffusion can generate much larger isotope fractionation than equilibrium isotope fractionation. Previous experimental studies on diffusive isotope fractionation have used diffusion couple experiments. Here, we report a study investigating diffusive Mg isotope fractionation in melts during mineral dissolution experiments in andesite, basalt, and Fe-free “basalt”. The goal of the study is to (a) use mineral dissolution experiments to determine the empirical β factor for diffusive isotope fractionation in melts, and (b) evaluate the variability of β for diffusive Mg isotope fractionation because literature data showed a range of 0.045 to 0.10. We first derive the analytical solution for diffusive isotope fractionation in melts during mineral dissolution and examine the dependence of the interface isotope ratio on other parameters and the behavior of the isotope diffusion profile. We then report SIMS measurement of Mg isotope diffusion profiles during anorthite dissolution in basalt and olivine dissolution in andesite. Mg isotope diffusion profiles during anorthite dissolution are as expected and can be modeled well leading to βMg of 0.052 ± 0.011 in a mid-ocean ridge basalt and 0.077 ± 0.012 in an FeO-free “basalt”, but the δ26Mg profile during an olivine dissolution experiment in andesite is not as expected. We suspected that the latter was due to significant matrix effect on analyzed δ26Mg values because of the large compositional variation along the diffusion profile. To examine this effect, glass standards with compositions similar to those in points along the diffusion profile were synthesized using MgO powders from the same bottle (meaning the same Mg isotope ratio). The matrix effect is indeed significant. After correcting for it, the diffusion profile of Mg isotope ratios is as expected and can be modeled well with βMg of 0.074 ± 0.002.
Combining the new result with previous results, the βMg value for diffusive isotope fractionation in andesite to basalt is 0.052 to 0.077 based on anorthite and olivine dissolution experiments, which lies within literature values. The range of βMg values can be reconciled using diffusion mechanisms inferred from multicomponent diffusion studies. The method developed in this study can be applied to investigate diffusive isotope fractionation in other mineral dissolution studies. Furthermore, diffusive isotope fractionation in melt during rapid phenocryst growth in natural basalt may also be measurable under favorable conditions, potentially opening a new perspective in understanding crystal growth and fractionation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chemical Geology
Chemical Geology 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: Chemical Geology is an international journal that publishes original research papers on isotopic and elemental geochemistry, geochronology and cosmochemistry. The Journal focuses on chemical processes in igneous, metamorphic, and sedimentary petrology, low- and high-temperature aqueous solutions, biogeochemistry, the environment and cosmochemistry. Papers that are field, experimentally, or computationally based are appropriate if they are of broad international interest. The Journal generally does not publish papers that are primarily of regional or local interest, or which are primarily focused on remediation and applied geochemistry. The Journal also welcomes innovative papers dealing with significant analytical advances that are of wide interest in the community and extend significantly beyond the scope of what would be included in the methods section of a standard research paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信