在碳排放限额和交易政策下,数字化转型如何推动绿色科技并购?

IF 10.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
Bo Wang , Siyu Gong
{"title":"在碳排放限额和交易政策下,数字化转型如何推动绿色科技并购?","authors":"Bo Wang ,&nbsp;Siyu Gong","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Green technology mergers and acquisitions (GTMA) is a key strategic choice for enterprises' green transformation. But due to difficulties in evaluation, complex post-merger integration, and challenging compliance and risk management, enterprises need two prerequisites before implementation: opportunities and solutions. Among these, the carbon cap and trade policy (CCTP) provides businesses with economic opportunities to explore added value from green technologies. Digital transformation (DT), on the other hand, offers solutions by integrating internal resource management and increasing information transparency. However, the existing literatures overlook the necessity of this complex perspective in the implementation of GTMA strategy. Thus, based on institutional theory and Resource Based View, this paper takes Chinese listed enterprises’ GTMA practices from 2009 to 2021, uses difference-in-differences and moderating variable methods to explore: whether CCTP offers opportunities for GTMA and if DT can solve GTMA problems and its mechanism. Findings show CCTP and DT are prerequisites driving GTMA, and their synergy is crucial. DT-empowered internal control and environmental information disclosure are vital to overcome GTMA challenges. Also, this prerequisite combination is affected by enterprise scale, state-owned, and R&amp;D capabilities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 102868"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How does digital transformation drive green technology M&A under the carbon cap and trade policy?\",\"authors\":\"Bo Wang ,&nbsp;Siyu Gong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102868\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Green technology mergers and acquisitions (GTMA) is a key strategic choice for enterprises' green transformation. But due to difficulties in evaluation, complex post-merger integration, and challenging compliance and risk management, enterprises need two prerequisites before implementation: opportunities and solutions. Among these, the carbon cap and trade policy (CCTP) provides businesses with economic opportunities to explore added value from green technologies. Digital transformation (DT), on the other hand, offers solutions by integrating internal resource management and increasing information transparency. However, the existing literatures overlook the necessity of this complex perspective in the implementation of GTMA strategy. Thus, based on institutional theory and Resource Based View, this paper takes Chinese listed enterprises’ GTMA practices from 2009 to 2021, uses difference-in-differences and moderating variable methods to explore: whether CCTP offers opportunities for GTMA and if DT can solve GTMA problems and its mechanism. Findings show CCTP and DT are prerequisites driving GTMA, and their synergy is crucial. DT-empowered internal control and environmental information disclosure are vital to overcome GTMA challenges. Also, this prerequisite combination is affected by enterprise scale, state-owned, and R&amp;D capabilities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology in Society\",\"volume\":\"81 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102868\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology in Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25000582\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25000582","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

绿色技术并购是企业绿色转型的关键战略选择。但由于评估困难、并购后整合复杂、合规和风险管理具有挑战性,企业在实施前需要两个先决条件:机会和解决方案。其中,碳排放限额和交易政策(CCTP)为企业提供了探索绿色技术附加值的经济机会。另一方面,数字化转型(DT)通过整合内部资源管理和提高信息透明度提供解决方案。然而,现有文献忽视了这种复杂视角在GTMA战略实施中的必要性。因此,本文基于制度理论和资源基础观,以2009 - 2021年中国上市企业的GTMA实践为研究对象,采用差异中的差异和调节变量方法,探讨CCTP是否为GTMA提供了机会,DT是否能够解决GTMA问题及其机制。研究结果表明,CCTP和DT是驱动GTMA的先决条件,它们的协同作用至关重要。dt授权的内部控制和环境信息披露对于克服GTMA挑战至关重要。同样,这种先决条件组合受到企业规模、国有企业和研发能力的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How does digital transformation drive green technology M&A under the carbon cap and trade policy?
Green technology mergers and acquisitions (GTMA) is a key strategic choice for enterprises' green transformation. But due to difficulties in evaluation, complex post-merger integration, and challenging compliance and risk management, enterprises need two prerequisites before implementation: opportunities and solutions. Among these, the carbon cap and trade policy (CCTP) provides businesses with economic opportunities to explore added value from green technologies. Digital transformation (DT), on the other hand, offers solutions by integrating internal resource management and increasing information transparency. However, the existing literatures overlook the necessity of this complex perspective in the implementation of GTMA strategy. Thus, based on institutional theory and Resource Based View, this paper takes Chinese listed enterprises’ GTMA practices from 2009 to 2021, uses difference-in-differences and moderating variable methods to explore: whether CCTP offers opportunities for GTMA and if DT can solve GTMA problems and its mechanism. Findings show CCTP and DT are prerequisites driving GTMA, and their synergy is crucial. DT-empowered internal control and environmental information disclosure are vital to overcome GTMA challenges. Also, this prerequisite combination is affected by enterprise scale, state-owned, and R&D capabilities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信