团队层面的跨专业教育观念分析:一项对三个学生群体的研究

Q3 Social Sciences
Tina Gunaldo , Kelsey Witmeier , Harun Mazumder , Sharon Duffy , Colette Baudoin , Henry Sauviac , Susanne Straif-Bourgeois , Scott Edwards
{"title":"团队层面的跨专业教育观念分析:一项对三个学生群体的研究","authors":"Tina Gunaldo ,&nbsp;Kelsey Witmeier ,&nbsp;Harun Mazumder ,&nbsp;Sharon Duffy ,&nbsp;Colette Baudoin ,&nbsp;Henry Sauviac ,&nbsp;Susanne Straif-Bourgeois ,&nbsp;Scott Edwards","doi":"10.1016/j.xjep.2025.100741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The interprofessional education (IPE) literature showcases many studies reporting results at the all-student and academic program levels. However, if the purpose of <span>IPE</span> is to develop collaborative-practice ready professionals, analysis at the team level would better support the advancement of the <span>IPE</span> literature and future health care goals. Pre-licensure students engaged in a two-year IPE curriculum and individually completed the Student Perceptions of Interprofessional Clinical Education-Revised survey, version 2 (SPICE-R2), at the end of the first and second year. Teams were comprised of health profession students from 12 academic programs associated with the university. Exploratory and longitudinal analyses of the change in mean SPICE-R2 scores from post-year 1 and post-year 2 were conducted. Overall positive changes were seen at the all-student level. However, exploration at a team level revealed more divergent outcomes. Further research into the determinants of these team-level disparities is required to improve IPE curriculum design.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37998,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 100741"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of interprofessional education perceptions at the team level: A study across three student cohorts\",\"authors\":\"Tina Gunaldo ,&nbsp;Kelsey Witmeier ,&nbsp;Harun Mazumder ,&nbsp;Sharon Duffy ,&nbsp;Colette Baudoin ,&nbsp;Henry Sauviac ,&nbsp;Susanne Straif-Bourgeois ,&nbsp;Scott Edwards\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xjep.2025.100741\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The interprofessional education (IPE) literature showcases many studies reporting results at the all-student and academic program levels. However, if the purpose of <span>IPE</span> is to develop collaborative-practice ready professionals, analysis at the team level would better support the advancement of the <span>IPE</span> literature and future health care goals. Pre-licensure students engaged in a two-year IPE curriculum and individually completed the Student Perceptions of Interprofessional Clinical Education-Revised survey, version 2 (SPICE-R2), at the end of the first and second year. Teams were comprised of health profession students from 12 academic programs associated with the university. Exploratory and longitudinal analyses of the change in mean SPICE-R2 scores from post-year 1 and post-year 2 were conducted. Overall positive changes were seen at the all-student level. However, exploration at a team level revealed more divergent outcomes. Further research into the determinants of these team-level disparities is required to improve IPE curriculum design.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice\",\"volume\":\"39 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100741\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405452625000047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405452625000047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

跨专业教育(IPE)文献展示了许多在全学生和学术课程水平上报告结果的研究。然而,如果IPE的目的是培养具备协作实践能力的专业人员,那么团队层面的分析将更好地支持IPE文献的进步和未来的医疗保健目标。获得执照前的学生参加了为期两年的国际临床医学中心课程,并在第一学年和第二学年结束时单独完成了《学生对跨专业临床教育的看法-修订调查》第2版(SPICE-R2)。参赛队伍由来自该大学12个学术项目的卫生专业学生组成。对第1年后和第2年后的SPICE-R2平均评分的变化进行了探索性和纵向分析。总体而言,在所有学生水平上都出现了积极的变化。然而,团队层面的探索揭示了更多不同的结果。需要进一步研究这些团队层面差异的决定因素,以改进IPE课程设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of interprofessional education perceptions at the team level: A study across three student cohorts
The interprofessional education (IPE) literature showcases many studies reporting results at the all-student and academic program levels. However, if the purpose of IPE is to develop collaborative-practice ready professionals, analysis at the team level would better support the advancement of the IPE literature and future health care goals. Pre-licensure students engaged in a two-year IPE curriculum and individually completed the Student Perceptions of Interprofessional Clinical Education-Revised survey, version 2 (SPICE-R2), at the end of the first and second year. Teams were comprised of health profession students from 12 academic programs associated with the university. Exploratory and longitudinal analyses of the change in mean SPICE-R2 scores from post-year 1 and post-year 2 were conducted. Overall positive changes were seen at the all-student level. However, exploration at a team level revealed more divergent outcomes. Further research into the determinants of these team-level disparities is required to improve IPE curriculum design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, a quarterly online-only journal, provides innovative ideas for interprofessional educators and practitioners through peer-reviewed articles and reports. Each issue examines current issues and trends in interprofessional healthcare topics, offering progressive solutions to the challenges facing the profession. The Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice (JIEP) is affiliated with University of Nebraska Medical Center and the official journal of National Academies of Practice (NAP) and supports its mission to serve the public and the health profession by advancing education, policy, practice & research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信