{"title":"评估日本FDG-PET报告中恶性淋巴瘤Lugano分类的大型语言模型。","authors":"Rintaro Ito, Keita Kato, Kosuke Nanataki, Yumi Abe, Hiroshi Ogawa, Ryogo Minamimoto, Katsuhiko Kato, Toshiaki Taoka, Shinji Naganawa","doi":"10.1186/s41824-025-00246-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluates the performance of four large language models (LLMs) in classifying malignant lymphoma stages using the Lugano classification from free-text FDG-PET reports in Japanese Specifically, we assess GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Llama 3 70B, and Gemma 2 27B in their ability interpret unstructured radiology texts.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In a retrospective single-center study, 80 patients who underwent staging FDG-PET/CT for malignant lymphoma were included. The \"Findings\" sections of their reports were analyzed without pre-processing. Each LLM assigned Lugano stages based on these reports. Performance was compared to reference standard stages determined by expert radiologists. Statistical analyses involved overall accuracy, weighted kappa for agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GPT-4o achieved the highest accuracy at 75% (60/80 cases) with substantial agreement (weighted kappa κ = 0.801). Claude 3.5 Sonnet had 61.3% accuracy (49/80, κ = 0.763). Gemma 2 27B and Llama 3 70B showed accuracies of 58.8% and 57.5%, respectively, all indicating substantial agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GPT-4o outperformed other LLMs in assigning Lugano classification from Japanese FDG-PET free-text reports. This demonstrated the potential of advanced LLMs to interpret clinical texts. While the immediate clinical utility of automatically predicting a Lugano stage from an existing report may be limited, these results highlight the value of LLMs for understanding and standardizing free-text radiology data.</p>","PeriodicalId":519909,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI reports","volume":"9 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11891112/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing large language models for Lugano classification of malignant lymphoma in Japanese FDG-PET reports.\",\"authors\":\"Rintaro Ito, Keita Kato, Kosuke Nanataki, Yumi Abe, Hiroshi Ogawa, Ryogo Minamimoto, Katsuhiko Kato, Toshiaki Taoka, Shinji Naganawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41824-025-00246-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluates the performance of four large language models (LLMs) in classifying malignant lymphoma stages using the Lugano classification from free-text FDG-PET reports in Japanese Specifically, we assess GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Llama 3 70B, and Gemma 2 27B in their ability interpret unstructured radiology texts.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In a retrospective single-center study, 80 patients who underwent staging FDG-PET/CT for malignant lymphoma were included. The \\\"Findings\\\" sections of their reports were analyzed without pre-processing. Each LLM assigned Lugano stages based on these reports. Performance was compared to reference standard stages determined by expert radiologists. Statistical analyses involved overall accuracy, weighted kappa for agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GPT-4o achieved the highest accuracy at 75% (60/80 cases) with substantial agreement (weighted kappa κ = 0.801). Claude 3.5 Sonnet had 61.3% accuracy (49/80, κ = 0.763). Gemma 2 27B and Llama 3 70B showed accuracies of 58.8% and 57.5%, respectively, all indicating substantial agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GPT-4o outperformed other LLMs in assigning Lugano classification from Japanese FDG-PET free-text reports. This demonstrated the potential of advanced LLMs to interpret clinical texts. While the immediate clinical utility of automatically predicting a Lugano stage from an existing report may be limited, these results highlight the value of LLMs for understanding and standardizing free-text radiology data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EJNMMI reports\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11891112/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EJNMMI reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41824-025-00246-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJNMMI reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41824-025-00246-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing large language models for Lugano classification of malignant lymphoma in Japanese FDG-PET reports.
Purpose: This study evaluates the performance of four large language models (LLMs) in classifying malignant lymphoma stages using the Lugano classification from free-text FDG-PET reports in Japanese Specifically, we assess GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Llama 3 70B, and Gemma 2 27B in their ability interpret unstructured radiology texts.
Materials and methods: In a retrospective single-center study, 80 patients who underwent staging FDG-PET/CT for malignant lymphoma were included. The "Findings" sections of their reports were analyzed without pre-processing. Each LLM assigned Lugano stages based on these reports. Performance was compared to reference standard stages determined by expert radiologists. Statistical analyses involved overall accuracy, weighted kappa for agreement.
Results: GPT-4o achieved the highest accuracy at 75% (60/80 cases) with substantial agreement (weighted kappa κ = 0.801). Claude 3.5 Sonnet had 61.3% accuracy (49/80, κ = 0.763). Gemma 2 27B and Llama 3 70B showed accuracies of 58.8% and 57.5%, respectively, all indicating substantial agreement.
Conclusion: GPT-4o outperformed other LLMs in assigning Lugano classification from Japanese FDG-PET free-text reports. This demonstrated the potential of advanced LLMs to interpret clinical texts. While the immediate clinical utility of automatically predicting a Lugano stage from an existing report may be limited, these results highlight the value of LLMs for understanding and standardizing free-text radiology data.