所有的工作和所有的娱乐:参加以学术为中心的课外活动与更好的数学成绩有关。

Journal of healthy eating and active living Pub Date : 2025-02-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01
Jamie H Wu, Hope O Akaeze, Naikuan Yang, Beth Prince, Minchuan Anderson, Debbie Stoddard, Holli Schlukebir
{"title":"所有的工作和所有的娱乐:参加以学术为中心的课外活动与更好的数学成绩有关。","authors":"Jamie H Wu, Hope O Akaeze, Naikuan Yang, Beth Prince, Minchuan Anderson, Debbie Stoddard, Holli Schlukebir","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Designed to improve outcomes for children from high-poverty, low-performing schools, the federally funded 21<sup>st</sup> Century Community Learning Centers (CCLC) program emphasizes academic outcomes. We examined the effects of participation in academic and leisure activities in Michigan 21<sup>st</sup> CCLC programs on English language arts (ELA) and mathematics grades among seventh- and eighth-grade students. Leisure activities were defined as any nonacademic activity: recreation and social time, physical movement, youth development, arts, and health and nutrition. Results showed that male students, low-income students, and academically at-risk students had lower grades in both ELA and math grades than their counterparts, regardless of other demographic factors or participation patterns. Data from our sample did not reveal any racial differences in ELA and math grades. Being older and having special education status were both associated with lower ELA grades, while English language learners tended to have higher ELA grades. After adjusting for these demographic differences, our study found that the dosage of leisure activities was linked to better math grades, while the dosage of academic activities was not linked to either ELA or math grades. A 10-hour increase in leisure activity time was associated with an increase in the math grade point of approximately 0.02 (A = grade point 4; B = 3), on average. Our study suggests that children from disadvantaged backgrounds might be best served when 21<sup>st</sup> CCLC programs balance their academic focus with play and leisure activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":73774,"journal":{"name":"Journal of healthy eating and active living","volume":"5 1","pages":"111-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11887925/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"All Work and All Play: Participation in Leisure Activities in Academically Focused Afterschool Programming Is Linked to Better Math Grades.\",\"authors\":\"Jamie H Wu, Hope O Akaeze, Naikuan Yang, Beth Prince, Minchuan Anderson, Debbie Stoddard, Holli Schlukebir\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Designed to improve outcomes for children from high-poverty, low-performing schools, the federally funded 21<sup>st</sup> Century Community Learning Centers (CCLC) program emphasizes academic outcomes. We examined the effects of participation in academic and leisure activities in Michigan 21<sup>st</sup> CCLC programs on English language arts (ELA) and mathematics grades among seventh- and eighth-grade students. Leisure activities were defined as any nonacademic activity: recreation and social time, physical movement, youth development, arts, and health and nutrition. Results showed that male students, low-income students, and academically at-risk students had lower grades in both ELA and math grades than their counterparts, regardless of other demographic factors or participation patterns. Data from our sample did not reveal any racial differences in ELA and math grades. Being older and having special education status were both associated with lower ELA grades, while English language learners tended to have higher ELA grades. After adjusting for these demographic differences, our study found that the dosage of leisure activities was linked to better math grades, while the dosage of academic activities was not linked to either ELA or math grades. A 10-hour increase in leisure activity time was associated with an increase in the math grade point of approximately 0.02 (A = grade point 4; B = 3), on average. Our study suggests that children from disadvantaged backgrounds might be best served when 21<sup>st</sup> CCLC programs balance their academic focus with play and leisure activities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of healthy eating and active living\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"111-122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11887925/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of healthy eating and active living\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of healthy eating and active living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

联邦政府资助的21世纪社区学习中心(CCLC)项目旨在改善来自高贫困、低绩效学校的儿童的学业成绩。本研究考察了参与密歇根州第21届CCLC项目的学术和休闲活动对七年级和八年级学生英语语言艺术(ELA)和数学成绩的影响。休闲活动被定义为任何非学术活动:娱乐和社交时间、体育运动、青少年发展、艺术、健康和营养。结果显示,无论其他人口因素或参与模式如何,男性学生、低收入家庭学生和学业上有风险的学生在ELA和数学成绩上都比同龄学生低。我们的样本数据没有显示ELA和数学成绩有任何种族差异。年龄越大、接受过特殊教育的学生的ELA成绩越低,而英语学习者的ELA成绩越高。在对这些人口统计学差异进行调整后,我们的研究发现,休闲活动的剂量与更好的数学成绩有关,而学术活动的剂量与ELA或数学成绩无关。休闲活动时间每增加10小时,数学成绩就会提高大约0.02分(A = 4分;B = 3),平均而言。我们的研究表明,当21世纪CCLC项目将他们的学业重点与游戏和休闲活动相平衡时,弱势家庭的儿童可能会得到最好的服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
All Work and All Play: Participation in Leisure Activities in Academically Focused Afterschool Programming Is Linked to Better Math Grades.

Designed to improve outcomes for children from high-poverty, low-performing schools, the federally funded 21st Century Community Learning Centers (CCLC) program emphasizes academic outcomes. We examined the effects of participation in academic and leisure activities in Michigan 21st CCLC programs on English language arts (ELA) and mathematics grades among seventh- and eighth-grade students. Leisure activities were defined as any nonacademic activity: recreation and social time, physical movement, youth development, arts, and health and nutrition. Results showed that male students, low-income students, and academically at-risk students had lower grades in both ELA and math grades than their counterparts, regardless of other demographic factors or participation patterns. Data from our sample did not reveal any racial differences in ELA and math grades. Being older and having special education status were both associated with lower ELA grades, while English language learners tended to have higher ELA grades. After adjusting for these demographic differences, our study found that the dosage of leisure activities was linked to better math grades, while the dosage of academic activities was not linked to either ELA or math grades. A 10-hour increase in leisure activity time was associated with an increase in the math grade point of approximately 0.02 (A = grade point 4; B = 3), on average. Our study suggests that children from disadvantaged backgrounds might be best served when 21st CCLC programs balance their academic focus with play and leisure activities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信