在急症护理中给予患者、家属和工作人员可靠的声音:英国医院实施玛莎规则的专家指导。

Future healthcare journal Pub Date : 2025-01-14 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.fhj.2025.100223
John Welch, Jane Murkin, Eirian Edwards, Matthew Inada-Kim, Christian Subbe
{"title":"在急症护理中给予患者、家属和工作人员可靠的声音:英国医院实施玛莎规则的专家指导。","authors":"John Welch, Jane Murkin, Eirian Edwards, Matthew Inada-Kim, Christian Subbe","doi":"10.1016/j.fhj.2025.100223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>'Failure to rescue' in patients with documented signs of deterioration results in an estimated five potentially avoidable deaths at each acute trust in England each month. One common cause is inattention to concerns of patients or their families about acute deterioration. Martha's Rule requires reliable methods for (1) patients or their families to escalate worries and concerns about deterioration and (2) to routinely input their understanding of their illness/wellness and trajectory into the health record. This paper sets out the rationale for these approaches. Following review with staff from the first wave of British units that have introduced Martha's Rule or similar systems, the authors suggest tested and evidence-based methods for implementation and describe gaps in current understanding of such systems. Importantly, the paper outlines answers to frequently voiced concerns about these sorts of methods and a set of suitable metrics for organisations to measure the impact of implementation on processes and outcomes in acute care.</p>","PeriodicalId":73125,"journal":{"name":"Future healthcare journal","volume":"12 1","pages":"100223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11889965/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Giving patients, families and staff a reliable voice in acute care: Expert guidance for implementation of Martha's Rule in UK hospitals.\",\"authors\":\"John Welch, Jane Murkin, Eirian Edwards, Matthew Inada-Kim, Christian Subbe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fhj.2025.100223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>'Failure to rescue' in patients with documented signs of deterioration results in an estimated five potentially avoidable deaths at each acute trust in England each month. One common cause is inattention to concerns of patients or their families about acute deterioration. Martha's Rule requires reliable methods for (1) patients or their families to escalate worries and concerns about deterioration and (2) to routinely input their understanding of their illness/wellness and trajectory into the health record. This paper sets out the rationale for these approaches. Following review with staff from the first wave of British units that have introduced Martha's Rule or similar systems, the authors suggest tested and evidence-based methods for implementation and describe gaps in current understanding of such systems. Importantly, the paper outlines answers to frequently voiced concerns about these sorts of methods and a set of suitable metrics for organisations to measure the impact of implementation on processes and outcomes in acute care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future healthcare journal\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"100223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11889965/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future healthcare journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fhj.2025.100223\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future healthcare journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fhj.2025.100223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“抢救失败”的病人有恶化的迹象,导致估计五个本可以避免的死亡在英国每个急性信托每月。一个常见的原因是没有注意到患者或其家属对急性恶化的担忧。玛莎规则需要可靠的方法(1)患者或其家属升级对病情恶化的担忧和担忧,(2)定期将他们对自己的疾病/健康状况和轨迹的理解输入健康记录。本文阐述了这些方法的基本原理。在与引进玛莎规则或类似系统的第一波英国单位的工作人员进行审查后,作者提出了经过测试和基于证据的实施方法,并描述了目前对此类系统理解的差距。重要的是,本文概述了对这些方法经常表达的担忧的答案,并为组织提供了一套合适的指标,以衡量实施对急性护理过程和结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Giving patients, families and staff a reliable voice in acute care: Expert guidance for implementation of Martha's Rule in UK hospitals.

'Failure to rescue' in patients with documented signs of deterioration results in an estimated five potentially avoidable deaths at each acute trust in England each month. One common cause is inattention to concerns of patients or their families about acute deterioration. Martha's Rule requires reliable methods for (1) patients or their families to escalate worries and concerns about deterioration and (2) to routinely input their understanding of their illness/wellness and trajectory into the health record. This paper sets out the rationale for these approaches. Following review with staff from the first wave of British units that have introduced Martha's Rule or similar systems, the authors suggest tested and evidence-based methods for implementation and describe gaps in current understanding of such systems. Importantly, the paper outlines answers to frequently voiced concerns about these sorts of methods and a set of suitable metrics for organisations to measure the impact of implementation on processes and outcomes in acute care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信