{"title":"从慢性病患者和多重护理需求的角度看综合初级保健的障碍和促进因素:范围审查","authors":"L Fischer, R G M Smeets, M Rijken, A M J Elissen","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Integrated care attempts to address multiple care needs, but barriers to implementation remain. The service user perspective can guide policy and practice to advance implementation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To map barriers and facilitators to integrated primary care from the perspective of people with chronic conditions and multiple care needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and grey literature. Eligible studies were analysed by categorising barriers and facilitators at the micro, meso, and macro levels of the healthcare system. They were further mapped by the components retrieved from the SELFIE framework for integrated care for multimorbidity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across the 34 included studies, people with multiple care needs identified more barriers and facilitators at the micro level than at the meso and macro levels. Mapped under 'the individual and their environment', social and personal barriers (e.g. socioeconomic disadvantages, lack of social support) hindered integrated care. Mapped under 'service delivery' and 'workforce', a trusting relationship with a key care provider as part of a multidisciplinary care team was identified to facilitate integrated care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings show that 'soft' relational and social factors are critical to integrated care. These 'soft' factors are primarily created at the micro level, but seem actionable at meso and macro levels. The unique perspective of people with multiple care needs suggests that more rigorous involvement of service users at higher levels is needed to inform policymakers and care providers on how to shape enabling conditions for the implementation of integrated care.</p>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":" ","pages":"105283"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and facilitators to integrated primary care from the perspective of people with chronic conditions and multiple care needs: A scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"L Fischer, R G M Smeets, M Rijken, A M J Elissen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105283\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Integrated care attempts to address multiple care needs, but barriers to implementation remain. The service user perspective can guide policy and practice to advance implementation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To map barriers and facilitators to integrated primary care from the perspective of people with chronic conditions and multiple care needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and grey literature. Eligible studies were analysed by categorising barriers and facilitators at the micro, meso, and macro levels of the healthcare system. They were further mapped by the components retrieved from the SELFIE framework for integrated care for multimorbidity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across the 34 included studies, people with multiple care needs identified more barriers and facilitators at the micro level than at the meso and macro levels. Mapped under 'the individual and their environment', social and personal barriers (e.g. socioeconomic disadvantages, lack of social support) hindered integrated care. Mapped under 'service delivery' and 'workforce', a trusting relationship with a key care provider as part of a multidisciplinary care team was identified to facilitate integrated care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings show that 'soft' relational and social factors are critical to integrated care. These 'soft' factors are primarily created at the micro level, but seem actionable at meso and macro levels. The unique perspective of people with multiple care needs suggests that more rigorous involvement of service users at higher levels is needed to inform policymakers and care providers on how to shape enabling conditions for the implementation of integrated care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"105283\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105283\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105283","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:综合护理试图解决多种护理需求,但实施的障碍仍然存在。服务用户视角可以指导政策和实践以推进实施。目的:从慢性病患者和多重护理需求的角度分析综合初级保健的障碍和促进因素。方法:通过检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、CINAHL和灰色文献进行范围综述。通过对医疗保健系统的微观、中观和宏观层面的障碍和促进因素进行分类,对符合条件的研究进行了分析。通过对多病综合护理的自拍框架检索的组件进一步绘制了它们。结果:在34项纳入的研究中,有多种护理需求的人在微观层面上比在中观和宏观层面上发现了更多的障碍和促进因素。在“个人及其环境”下,社会和个人障碍(如社会经济劣势、缺乏社会支持)阻碍了综合护理。在“服务交付”和“劳动力”下,与关键护理提供者建立信任关系,作为多学科护理团队的一部分,以促进综合护理。结论:我们的研究结果表明,“软”关系和社会因素对综合护理至关重要。这些“软”因素主要是在微观层面产生的,但在中观和宏观层面似乎是可行的。有多种护理需求的人的独特视角表明,需要更高层次的服务使用者更严格地参与,以便向决策者和护理提供者提供信息,了解如何为实施综合护理创造有利条件。
Barriers and facilitators to integrated primary care from the perspective of people with chronic conditions and multiple care needs: A scoping review.
Background: Integrated care attempts to address multiple care needs, but barriers to implementation remain. The service user perspective can guide policy and practice to advance implementation.
Objective: To map barriers and facilitators to integrated primary care from the perspective of people with chronic conditions and multiple care needs.
Methods: A scoping review was conducted by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and grey literature. Eligible studies were analysed by categorising barriers and facilitators at the micro, meso, and macro levels of the healthcare system. They were further mapped by the components retrieved from the SELFIE framework for integrated care for multimorbidity.
Results: Across the 34 included studies, people with multiple care needs identified more barriers and facilitators at the micro level than at the meso and macro levels. Mapped under 'the individual and their environment', social and personal barriers (e.g. socioeconomic disadvantages, lack of social support) hindered integrated care. Mapped under 'service delivery' and 'workforce', a trusting relationship with a key care provider as part of a multidisciplinary care team was identified to facilitate integrated care.
Conclusions: Our findings show that 'soft' relational and social factors are critical to integrated care. These 'soft' factors are primarily created at the micro level, but seem actionable at meso and macro levels. The unique perspective of people with multiple care needs suggests that more rigorous involvement of service users at higher levels is needed to inform policymakers and care providers on how to shape enabling conditions for the implementation of integrated care.
期刊介绍:
Health Policy is intended to be a vehicle for the exploration and discussion of health policy and health system issues and is aimed in particular at enhancing communication between health policy and system researchers, legislators, decision-makers and professionals concerned with developing, implementing, and analysing health policy, health systems and health care reforms, primarily in high-income countries outside the U.S.A.