侧块椎弓根内螺钉固定:螺钉拔出强度的影像学评价。

IF 1.4 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Kota Kojima, Hiroaki Kanbe, Kenichiro Fukui, Takahiro Endo, Yasuyuki Fukui, Masayuki Ishikawa, Shunji Asamoto
{"title":"侧块椎弓根内螺钉固定:螺钉拔出强度的影像学评价。","authors":"Kota Kojima, Hiroaki Kanbe, Kenichiro Fukui, Takahiro Endo, Yasuyuki Fukui, Masayuki Ishikawa, Shunji Asamoto","doi":"10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_160_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lateral mass intrapedicular screw (LMIS) fixation was introduced in 2021 as a safe and simple alternative method for the fixation of the subaxial cervical spine in the treatment of various cervical spine diseases. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the screw pullout strength of this new technique to the trajectories of two other major methods, the transpedicular screw (TPS) and lateral mass screw (LMS) methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two hundred and three patients who underwent a cervical computed tomography (CT) scan at our institution were included in the study. A region of interest for each of the three trajectories was selected using axial slices of the cervical vertebra from C3 through C6, and the CT number (Hounsfield unit) was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4872 data points were collected. The average age of the patients was 59.5 years. The male-to-female ratio was 135:68. The number of patients over the age of 65 was 93. The average CT numbers were 511.9 for TPS, 473.1 for LMS, and 598.5 for LMIS. There was a significant difference in the CT number among the three trajectories, even when adjusted for sex and age.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LMIS is a promising alternative to the common methods used for subaxial cervical spine fixation that has a significant pullout strength. This approach is worth considering in many patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":51721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","volume":"15 4","pages":"398-403"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11888025/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lateral mass intrapedicular screw fixation: A radiological evaluation of screw pullout strength.\",\"authors\":\"Kota Kojima, Hiroaki Kanbe, Kenichiro Fukui, Takahiro Endo, Yasuyuki Fukui, Masayuki Ishikawa, Shunji Asamoto\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_160_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lateral mass intrapedicular screw (LMIS) fixation was introduced in 2021 as a safe and simple alternative method for the fixation of the subaxial cervical spine in the treatment of various cervical spine diseases. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the screw pullout strength of this new technique to the trajectories of two other major methods, the transpedicular screw (TPS) and lateral mass screw (LMS) methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two hundred and three patients who underwent a cervical computed tomography (CT) scan at our institution were included in the study. A region of interest for each of the three trajectories was selected using axial slices of the cervical vertebra from C3 through C6, and the CT number (Hounsfield unit) was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4872 data points were collected. The average age of the patients was 59.5 years. The male-to-female ratio was 135:68. The number of patients over the age of 65 was 93. The average CT numbers were 511.9 for TPS, 473.1 for LMS, and 598.5 for LMIS. There was a significant difference in the CT number among the three trajectories, even when adjusted for sex and age.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LMIS is a promising alternative to the common methods used for subaxial cervical spine fixation that has a significant pullout strength. This approach is worth considering in many patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"398-403\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11888025/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_160_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_160_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:侧块椎弓根内螺钉(LMIS)固定于2021年被引入,作为一种安全简单的替代方法固定下颈椎治疗各种颈椎疾病。本研究的目的是评估和比较这种新技术的螺钉拔出强度与其他两种主要方法,经椎弓根螺钉(TPS)和侧块螺钉(LMS)方法的轨迹。方法:203例在我院接受宫颈计算机断层扫描(CT)的患者纳入研究。使用从C3到C6的颈椎轴向切片选择三个轨迹中的每个感兴趣的区域,并计算CT数(Hounsfield单位)。结果:共收集4872个数据点。患者平均年龄59.5岁。男女比例为135:68。65岁以上患者93例。TPS的平均CT数为511.9,LMS为473.1,LMIS为598.5。即使对性别和年龄进行了调整,三种轨迹的CT数也有显著差异。结论:LMIS是一种有希望的替代常用方法用于下轴颈椎固定,具有显著的拔出强度。这种方法值得许多患者考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lateral mass intrapedicular screw fixation: A radiological evaluation of screw pullout strength.

Background: Lateral mass intrapedicular screw (LMIS) fixation was introduced in 2021 as a safe and simple alternative method for the fixation of the subaxial cervical spine in the treatment of various cervical spine diseases. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the screw pullout strength of this new technique to the trajectories of two other major methods, the transpedicular screw (TPS) and lateral mass screw (LMS) methods.

Methods: Two hundred and three patients who underwent a cervical computed tomography (CT) scan at our institution were included in the study. A region of interest for each of the three trajectories was selected using axial slices of the cervical vertebra from C3 through C6, and the CT number (Hounsfield unit) was calculated.

Results: A total of 4872 data points were collected. The average age of the patients was 59.5 years. The male-to-female ratio was 135:68. The number of patients over the age of 65 was 93. The average CT numbers were 511.9 for TPS, 473.1 for LMS, and 598.5 for LMIS. There was a significant difference in the CT number among the three trajectories, even when adjusted for sex and age.

Conclusion: LMIS is a promising alternative to the common methods used for subaxial cervical spine fixation that has a significant pullout strength. This approach is worth considering in many patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信