远端周围神经阻滞治疗腰椎痛的疗效:三盲随机安慰剂对照研究。

IF 1.4 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Vivek Jha, Gaurav Kumar Sharma, Omeshwar Singh, Jatin Aggarwal
{"title":"远端周围神经阻滞治疗腰椎痛的疗效:三盲随机安慰剂对照研究。","authors":"Vivek Jha, Gaurav Kumar Sharma, Omeshwar Singh, Jatin Aggarwal","doi":"10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_90_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Inflamed nerve root leads to mechano-sensitization and upregulation of sodium channels in nerve endings far distal to the site of inflammation, leading to tenderness of these nerve endings. Due to pseudounipolar nature, the blockade of sodium channels at peripheral nerve endings leads to relief in radicular pain.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of bupivacaine in improving pain and straight leg raising test (SLRT), 30 min after injection around tender nerves near the ankle, in patients with unilateral radicular pain.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a randomized placebo-controlled triple-blinded study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred patients of single-level lumbar disc prolapse and unilateral radicular pain were randomized into two equal groups. Three nerves (sural nerve, lateral branch of deep peroneal nerve and posterior tibial nerve) were assessed for tenderness around the ankle. Bupivacaine (0.5%) was injected around each tender nerve in the case group whereas equal volume of normal saline was injected in the control group around each tender nerve. Pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and SLRT were checked before and 30 min postinjection. A proportion of patients achieving minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of NRS ≤4 and MCID of SLRT ≥30° were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A mean decrease in NRS among cases was from 8.06 ± 1.236 to 3.90 ± 2.013 (<i>P</i> < 0.001) with 78% achieving MCID. A mean decrease in NRS in the control group was from 7.88 ± 1.023 to 7.66 ± 1.171 (<i>P</i> = 0.084), and only 2% of patients achieved MCID. There was a statistically significant improvement in SLR in the case group (40.90°-60.90°, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and 54% showed a clinically significant improvement by crossing MCID threshold. The control group showed nonsignificant improvement in SLRT (38.10°-39.10°, <i>P</i> = 0.351), and only 2% achieved MCID.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In single-level lumbar disc prolapse with unilateral radicular pain, injection of bupivacaine 0.5% (a sodium channel blocker) around tender nerves near the ankle provides clinically significant relief in pain and SLRT at 30 min when compared to placebo.</p>","PeriodicalId":51721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","volume":"15 4","pages":"448-454"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11888027/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of distal peripheral nerve blocks in lumbar radicular pain: A randomized placebo-controlled triple-blinded study.\",\"authors\":\"Vivek Jha, Gaurav Kumar Sharma, Omeshwar Singh, Jatin Aggarwal\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_90_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Inflamed nerve root leads to mechano-sensitization and upregulation of sodium channels in nerve endings far distal to the site of inflammation, leading to tenderness of these nerve endings. Due to pseudounipolar nature, the blockade of sodium channels at peripheral nerve endings leads to relief in radicular pain.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of bupivacaine in improving pain and straight leg raising test (SLRT), 30 min after injection around tender nerves near the ankle, in patients with unilateral radicular pain.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a randomized placebo-controlled triple-blinded study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred patients of single-level lumbar disc prolapse and unilateral radicular pain were randomized into two equal groups. Three nerves (sural nerve, lateral branch of deep peroneal nerve and posterior tibial nerve) were assessed for tenderness around the ankle. Bupivacaine (0.5%) was injected around each tender nerve in the case group whereas equal volume of normal saline was injected in the control group around each tender nerve. Pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and SLRT were checked before and 30 min postinjection. A proportion of patients achieving minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of NRS ≤4 and MCID of SLRT ≥30° were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A mean decrease in NRS among cases was from 8.06 ± 1.236 to 3.90 ± 2.013 (<i>P</i> < 0.001) with 78% achieving MCID. A mean decrease in NRS in the control group was from 7.88 ± 1.023 to 7.66 ± 1.171 (<i>P</i> = 0.084), and only 2% of patients achieved MCID. There was a statistically significant improvement in SLR in the case group (40.90°-60.90°, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and 54% showed a clinically significant improvement by crossing MCID threshold. The control group showed nonsignificant improvement in SLRT (38.10°-39.10°, <i>P</i> = 0.351), and only 2% achieved MCID.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In single-level lumbar disc prolapse with unilateral radicular pain, injection of bupivacaine 0.5% (a sodium channel blocker) around tender nerves near the ankle provides clinically significant relief in pain and SLRT at 30 min when compared to placebo.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"448-454\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11888027/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_90_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_90_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:炎症的神经根导致远远端的神经末梢的钠通道机械致敏和上调,导致这些神经末梢压痛。由于其伪单极性,阻断周围神经末梢钠离子通道可减轻神经根性疼痛。目的:本研究的目的是评估布比卡因在改善单侧神经根性疼痛患者的疼痛和直腿抬高试验(SLRT)的效果,注射后30分钟,在踝关节附近的柔软神经周围。设计:这是一项随机、安慰剂对照的三盲研究。方法:将100例单节段腰椎间盘突出伴单侧神经根性疼痛患者随机分为两组。评估腓肠神经、腓深神经外侧支和胫后神经3条神经是否有踝关节周围压痛。病例组在每条压痛神经周围注射0.5%布比卡因,对照组在每条压痛神经周围注射等量生理盐水。分别于注射前和注射后30 min检查疼痛评定量表(NRS)和SLRT。比较NRS最小临床重要差异(MCID)≤4和SLRT MCID≥30°的患者比例。结果:NRS平均下降8.06±1.236至3.90±2.013 (P < 0.001),其中78%达到MCID。对照组NRS平均下降7.88±1.023至7.66±1.171 (P = 0.084),仅有2%的患者达到MCID。病例组SLR改善有统计学意义(40.90°~ 60.90°,P < 0.001), 54%患者通过MCID阈值有临床显著改善。对照组SLRT无显著改善(38.10°~ 39.10°,P = 0.351),仅2%达到MCID。结论:在单节段腰椎间盘突出伴单侧神经根性疼痛的患者中,与安慰剂相比,在靠近踝关节的柔软神经周围注射0.5%布比卡因(一种钠通道阻滞剂)可在30分钟内显著缓解疼痛和SLRT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of distal peripheral nerve blocks in lumbar radicular pain: A randomized placebo-controlled triple-blinded study.

Context: Inflamed nerve root leads to mechano-sensitization and upregulation of sodium channels in nerve endings far distal to the site of inflammation, leading to tenderness of these nerve endings. Due to pseudounipolar nature, the blockade of sodium channels at peripheral nerve endings leads to relief in radicular pain.

Aims: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of bupivacaine in improving pain and straight leg raising test (SLRT), 30 min after injection around tender nerves near the ankle, in patients with unilateral radicular pain.

Design: This was a randomized placebo-controlled triple-blinded study.

Methods: One hundred patients of single-level lumbar disc prolapse and unilateral radicular pain were randomized into two equal groups. Three nerves (sural nerve, lateral branch of deep peroneal nerve and posterior tibial nerve) were assessed for tenderness around the ankle. Bupivacaine (0.5%) was injected around each tender nerve in the case group whereas equal volume of normal saline was injected in the control group around each tender nerve. Pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and SLRT were checked before and 30 min postinjection. A proportion of patients achieving minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of NRS ≤4 and MCID of SLRT ≥30° were compared.

Results: A mean decrease in NRS among cases was from 8.06 ± 1.236 to 3.90 ± 2.013 (P < 0.001) with 78% achieving MCID. A mean decrease in NRS in the control group was from 7.88 ± 1.023 to 7.66 ± 1.171 (P = 0.084), and only 2% of patients achieved MCID. There was a statistically significant improvement in SLR in the case group (40.90°-60.90°, P < 0.001), and 54% showed a clinically significant improvement by crossing MCID threshold. The control group showed nonsignificant improvement in SLRT (38.10°-39.10°, P = 0.351), and only 2% achieved MCID.

Conclusions: In single-level lumbar disc prolapse with unilateral radicular pain, injection of bupivacaine 0.5% (a sodium channel blocker) around tender nerves near the ankle provides clinically significant relief in pain and SLRT at 30 min when compared to placebo.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信