比较超声波、胸部 X 光和 CT 扫描在肺炎检测中的应用。

IF 1.3 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research Pub Date : 2025-03-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/MDER.S501714
Ziyad F Al Nufaiei, Khalid M Alshamrani
{"title":"比较超声波、胸部 X 光和 CT 扫描在肺炎检测中的应用。","authors":"Ziyad F Al Nufaiei, Khalid M Alshamrani","doi":"10.2147/MDER.S501714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The clinical methods of diagnosing pneumonia have been for many years chest X-rays (CXR) and computed tomography (CT) scans. However, a relatively new modality that is promising, efficient, and cheap is the lung ultrasound (LUS). The scope of this systematic review focuses on evaluating the diagnostic performance of LUS, CXR, and CT for diagnosing pneumonia.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The first aim of this review is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound in comparison with chest X-rays and CT scans.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Scopus were electronically searched without date and language limitations were set. Inclusion criteria covered only those diagnostic studies that involved comparing lung ultrasound, chest X-ray, and CT scans in human beings with suspected pneumonia. Both abstraction and quality of studies were assessed by two researchers and the quality was assessed using PRISMA and QUADAS-2 checklists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 13 empirical studies included in the review which referred to different patients and contexts. Although none of the imaging techniques could achieve both high sensitivity and high specificity, CT scans produced the highest sensitivity, with values higher than 95% on all occasions, and specificities ranging between 80% and 90%. Lung US was most helpful in pediatric and acute care populations, whereas CT was preferred when there was uncertainty regarding the presentation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lung ultrasound is a very sensitive, specific, practical method of subsequent lung examination; it is useful in environments that need fast bedside assessment and for patients particularly vulnerable to radiation exposure, such as children. Even though chest X-ray remains valuable in excluding pneumonia in outpatient practices, it lacks sensitivity and is therefore less useful in diagnosing early disease. Computed tomography scans are the most accurate type of scans but should only be used in the more severe interventions due to cost and radiation exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":47140,"journal":{"name":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"149-159"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11889995/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Ultrasound, Chest X-Ray, and CT Scan for Pneumonia Detection.\",\"authors\":\"Ziyad F Al Nufaiei, Khalid M Alshamrani\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/MDER.S501714\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The clinical methods of diagnosing pneumonia have been for many years chest X-rays (CXR) and computed tomography (CT) scans. However, a relatively new modality that is promising, efficient, and cheap is the lung ultrasound (LUS). The scope of this systematic review focuses on evaluating the diagnostic performance of LUS, CXR, and CT for diagnosing pneumonia.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The first aim of this review is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound in comparison with chest X-rays and CT scans.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Scopus were electronically searched without date and language limitations were set. Inclusion criteria covered only those diagnostic studies that involved comparing lung ultrasound, chest X-ray, and CT scans in human beings with suspected pneumonia. Both abstraction and quality of studies were assessed by two researchers and the quality was assessed using PRISMA and QUADAS-2 checklists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 13 empirical studies included in the review which referred to different patients and contexts. Although none of the imaging techniques could achieve both high sensitivity and high specificity, CT scans produced the highest sensitivity, with values higher than 95% on all occasions, and specificities ranging between 80% and 90%. Lung US was most helpful in pediatric and acute care populations, whereas CT was preferred when there was uncertainty regarding the presentation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lung ultrasound is a very sensitive, specific, practical method of subsequent lung examination; it is useful in environments that need fast bedside assessment and for patients particularly vulnerable to radiation exposure, such as children. Even though chest X-ray remains valuable in excluding pneumonia in outpatient practices, it lacks sensitivity and is therefore less useful in diagnosing early disease. Computed tomography scans are the most accurate type of scans but should only be used in the more severe interventions due to cost and radiation exposure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"149-159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11889995/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S501714\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S501714","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多年来,临床诊断肺炎的方法一直是胸部x光片(CXR)和计算机断层扫描(CT)。然而,一种相对较新的、有前途的、高效的、廉价的方法是肺超声(LUS)。本系统综述的范围侧重于评估LUS、CXR和CT诊断肺炎的诊断性能。目的:本综述的第一个目的是比较肺部超声与胸部x线和CT扫描的诊断准确性。方法:对PubMed、Cochrane、Embase、Scopus进行电子检索,不设日期和语言限制。纳入标准仅包括那些涉及比较疑似肺炎患者的肺超声、胸部x线和CT扫描的诊断性研究。研究的抽象性和质量均由两名研究人员评估,质量采用PRISMA和QUADAS-2检查表进行评估。结果:本综述共纳入13项实证研究,涉及不同的患者和背景。虽然没有一种成像技术可以同时达到高灵敏度和高特异性,但CT扫描产生了最高的灵敏度,在所有情况下的值都高于95%,特异性在80%到90%之间。肺超声在儿科和急症护理人群中最有帮助,而当表现不确定时,首选CT。结论:肺超声是一种灵敏、特异、实用的肺部后续检查方法;它在需要快速床边评估的环境中很有用,对于特别容易受到辐射照射的病人(如儿童)也很有用。尽管胸部x光在门诊排除肺炎方面仍有价值,但它缺乏敏感性,因此在诊断早期疾病方面用处不大。计算机断层扫描是最准确的扫描类型,但由于成本和辐射暴露,只能用于更严重的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing Ultrasound, Chest X-Ray, and CT Scan for Pneumonia Detection.

Background: The clinical methods of diagnosing pneumonia have been for many years chest X-rays (CXR) and computed tomography (CT) scans. However, a relatively new modality that is promising, efficient, and cheap is the lung ultrasound (LUS). The scope of this systematic review focuses on evaluating the diagnostic performance of LUS, CXR, and CT for diagnosing pneumonia.

Objective: The first aim of this review is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound in comparison with chest X-rays and CT scans.

Methods: PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Scopus were electronically searched without date and language limitations were set. Inclusion criteria covered only those diagnostic studies that involved comparing lung ultrasound, chest X-ray, and CT scans in human beings with suspected pneumonia. Both abstraction and quality of studies were assessed by two researchers and the quality was assessed using PRISMA and QUADAS-2 checklists.

Results: There were 13 empirical studies included in the review which referred to different patients and contexts. Although none of the imaging techniques could achieve both high sensitivity and high specificity, CT scans produced the highest sensitivity, with values higher than 95% on all occasions, and specificities ranging between 80% and 90%. Lung US was most helpful in pediatric and acute care populations, whereas CT was preferred when there was uncertainty regarding the presentation.

Conclusion: Lung ultrasound is a very sensitive, specific, practical method of subsequent lung examination; it is useful in environments that need fast bedside assessment and for patients particularly vulnerable to radiation exposure, such as children. Even though chest X-ray remains valuable in excluding pneumonia in outpatient practices, it lacks sensitivity and is therefore less useful in diagnosing early disease. Computed tomography scans are the most accurate type of scans but should only be used in the more severe interventions due to cost and radiation exposure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信