理解complex - usa Level-1作为及格/不及格考试:影响和机会。

IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ashley Gerhardson, Melissa Efurd, Patricia Sexton, Donald Sefcik
{"title":"理解complex - usa Level-1作为及格/不及格考试:影响和机会。","authors":"Ashley Gerhardson, Melissa Efurd, Patricia Sexton, Donald Sefcik","doi":"10.1515/jom-2024-0139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>In late 2020, the National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners (NBOME) announced that the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination (COMLEX-USA) Level 1 would discontinue reporting numeric scores, only providing a Pass/Fail designation. The National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) changed the core reports for the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step-1 to Pass/Fail in early 2020. Subsequently, residency program directors were reported to migrate toward increased reliance on COMLEX-USA Level 2CE and USMLE Step 2CK scores, the prestige of medical schools, and the status of the authors of letters of reference during their review of residency applicants.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Funded by an American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine (AACOM) research grant, A.T. Still University - Kirksville College of Osteopathic Medicine (ATSU-KCOM) and the Arkansas College of Osteopathic Medicine (ARCOM) generated a series of five hypotheses to investigate the perceived impact of the transition to Pass/Fail scoring.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Both institutional review boards (IRBs) provided exempt status for this study. The hypotheses were examined through surveys distributed to current osteopathic medical students (OMS), recent graduates (classes of 2021 and 2022), academic advisors, and college of osteopathic medicine (COM) curriculum committee members in this cohort study. The investigative process consisted of two surveys: an initial survey to collect data on all five hypotheses and a focused, follow-up survey designed to better understand the impact of the scoring change. The surveys collected respondent feedback based on a Likert Scale. Standard descriptive statistics were assembled and analyzed. Qualitative responses were coded into thematic elements to examine response patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial survey collected responses from 302 respondents (23.2 % response rate) based on a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). The survey results revealed the means for the following items based on a 4-point Likert scale (1=Strongly Disagree; 2=Disagree; 3=Agree; 4=Strongly Agree): (1) Increase chances of matching into residency: 2.35; (2) Pass/Fail is a positive change: 2.71; (3) Pass/Fail will reduce competition in competitive residency programs: 1.94; (4) clinical skills will be more strongly considered: 2.60; and (5) new score reports provide a robust analysis of strengths and weaknesses in basic science: 2.24. Almost half (46 %) of the respondents expressed negative sentiments toward the Pass/Fail change. Reasons included more emphasis on COMLEX-USA Level 2CE, decreased motivation to perform on COMLEX-USA Level 1, and the perceived disadvantages that resulted during the residency match process.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among the survey respondents, many, especially students, do not view the change as favorable. Respondents cited the primary reasons for their unfavorable perception as a lack of motivation to perform on COMLEX-USA Level 1 and the added stress of performing on COMLEX-USA Level 2CE. Additionally, respondents viewed the change as negatively impacting their audition rotations and subsequent residency competitiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding COMLEX-USA Level-1 as a Pass/Fail examination: impact and opportunities.\",\"authors\":\"Ashley Gerhardson, Melissa Efurd, Patricia Sexton, Donald Sefcik\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jom-2024-0139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>In late 2020, the National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners (NBOME) announced that the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination (COMLEX-USA) Level 1 would discontinue reporting numeric scores, only providing a Pass/Fail designation. The National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) changed the core reports for the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step-1 to Pass/Fail in early 2020. Subsequently, residency program directors were reported to migrate toward increased reliance on COMLEX-USA Level 2CE and USMLE Step 2CK scores, the prestige of medical schools, and the status of the authors of letters of reference during their review of residency applicants.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Funded by an American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine (AACOM) research grant, A.T. Still University - Kirksville College of Osteopathic Medicine (ATSU-KCOM) and the Arkansas College of Osteopathic Medicine (ARCOM) generated a series of five hypotheses to investigate the perceived impact of the transition to Pass/Fail scoring.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Both institutional review boards (IRBs) provided exempt status for this study. The hypotheses were examined through surveys distributed to current osteopathic medical students (OMS), recent graduates (classes of 2021 and 2022), academic advisors, and college of osteopathic medicine (COM) curriculum committee members in this cohort study. The investigative process consisted of two surveys: an initial survey to collect data on all five hypotheses and a focused, follow-up survey designed to better understand the impact of the scoring change. The surveys collected respondent feedback based on a Likert Scale. Standard descriptive statistics were assembled and analyzed. Qualitative responses were coded into thematic elements to examine response patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial survey collected responses from 302 respondents (23.2 % response rate) based on a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). The survey results revealed the means for the following items based on a 4-point Likert scale (1=Strongly Disagree; 2=Disagree; 3=Agree; 4=Strongly Agree): (1) Increase chances of matching into residency: 2.35; (2) Pass/Fail is a positive change: 2.71; (3) Pass/Fail will reduce competition in competitive residency programs: 1.94; (4) clinical skills will be more strongly considered: 2.60; and (5) new score reports provide a robust analysis of strengths and weaknesses in basic science: 2.24. Almost half (46 %) of the respondents expressed negative sentiments toward the Pass/Fail change. Reasons included more emphasis on COMLEX-USA Level 2CE, decreased motivation to perform on COMLEX-USA Level 1, and the perceived disadvantages that resulted during the residency match process.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among the survey respondents, many, especially students, do not view the change as favorable. Respondents cited the primary reasons for their unfavorable perception as a lack of motivation to perform on COMLEX-USA Level 1 and the added stress of performing on COMLEX-USA Level 2CE. Additionally, respondents viewed the change as negatively impacting their audition rotations and subsequent residency competitiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2024-0139\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2024-0139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2020年底,美国国家骨科医学检查委员会(nnbome)宣布,综合骨科医学执照考试(plex - usa) 1级将停止报告数字分数,只提供合格/不合格指定。2020年初,美国国家医学考试委员会(NBME)将美国医疗执照考试(USMLE)第一步的核心报告更改为通过/不通过。随后,据报道,住院医师项目主任在审查住院医师申请人时,越来越依赖于complex - usa Level 2CE和USMLE Step 2CK分数、医学院的声望和推荐信作者的地位。目的:在美国骨科医学院协会(AACOM)研究基金的资助下,A.T. Still大学- Kirksville骨科医学院(ATSU-KCOM)和阿肯色州骨科医学院(ARCOM)提出了一系列五个假设,以调查过渡到及格/不及格评分的感知影响。方法:两个机构审查委员会(irb)为本研究提供了豁免资格。本队列研究通过对现有骨科医学学生(OMS)、应届毕业生(2021和2022届)、学术顾问和骨科医学学院(COM)课程委员会成员的调查来检验这些假设。调查过程包括两项调查:一项是收集所有五个假设的数据的初步调查,另一项是旨在更好地了解评分变化的影响的重点跟踪调查。调查根据李克特量表收集了受访者的反馈。收集并分析标准描述性统计数据。定性答复被编码为主题要素,以检查答复模式。结果:最初的调查收集了302名受访者的回复(23.2% %回复率),基于1(非常不同意)到4(非常同意)的量表。调查结果显示,根据4分李克特量表(1=强烈不同意;2 =不同意;3 =同意;4=强烈同意):(1)增加匹配成为居民的机会:2.35;(2) Pass/Fail为正向变化:2.71;(3)通过/不及格将减少竞争性住院医师项目的竞争:1.94;(4)临床技能将得到更强烈的考虑:2.60分;(5)新的分数报告对基础科学的优势和劣势提供了强有力的分析。几乎一半(46% %)的受访者对及格/不及格的改变表达了负面情绪。原因包括更多地强调complex - usa 2级ce,减少了完成complex - usa 1级ce的动机,以及在住院比赛过程中产生的感知劣势。结论:在调查对象中,许多人,尤其是学生,并不认为这种变化是有利的。受访者指出,他们不满意的主要原因是缺乏完成complex - usa Level 1的动力,以及完成complex - usa Level 2CE的额外压力。此外,受访者认为这一变化对他们的试镜轮换和随后的实习竞争力产生了负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding COMLEX-USA Level-1 as a Pass/Fail examination: impact and opportunities.

Context: In late 2020, the National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners (NBOME) announced that the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination (COMLEX-USA) Level 1 would discontinue reporting numeric scores, only providing a Pass/Fail designation. The National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) changed the core reports for the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step-1 to Pass/Fail in early 2020. Subsequently, residency program directors were reported to migrate toward increased reliance on COMLEX-USA Level 2CE and USMLE Step 2CK scores, the prestige of medical schools, and the status of the authors of letters of reference during their review of residency applicants.

Objectives: Funded by an American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine (AACOM) research grant, A.T. Still University - Kirksville College of Osteopathic Medicine (ATSU-KCOM) and the Arkansas College of Osteopathic Medicine (ARCOM) generated a series of five hypotheses to investigate the perceived impact of the transition to Pass/Fail scoring.

Methods: Both institutional review boards (IRBs) provided exempt status for this study. The hypotheses were examined through surveys distributed to current osteopathic medical students (OMS), recent graduates (classes of 2021 and 2022), academic advisors, and college of osteopathic medicine (COM) curriculum committee members in this cohort study. The investigative process consisted of two surveys: an initial survey to collect data on all five hypotheses and a focused, follow-up survey designed to better understand the impact of the scoring change. The surveys collected respondent feedback based on a Likert Scale. Standard descriptive statistics were assembled and analyzed. Qualitative responses were coded into thematic elements to examine response patterns.

Results: The initial survey collected responses from 302 respondents (23.2 % response rate) based on a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). The survey results revealed the means for the following items based on a 4-point Likert scale (1=Strongly Disagree; 2=Disagree; 3=Agree; 4=Strongly Agree): (1) Increase chances of matching into residency: 2.35; (2) Pass/Fail is a positive change: 2.71; (3) Pass/Fail will reduce competition in competitive residency programs: 1.94; (4) clinical skills will be more strongly considered: 2.60; and (5) new score reports provide a robust analysis of strengths and weaknesses in basic science: 2.24. Almost half (46 %) of the respondents expressed negative sentiments toward the Pass/Fail change. Reasons included more emphasis on COMLEX-USA Level 2CE, decreased motivation to perform on COMLEX-USA Level 1, and the perceived disadvantages that resulted during the residency match process.

Conclusions: Among the survey respondents, many, especially students, do not view the change as favorable. Respondents cited the primary reasons for their unfavorable perception as a lack of motivation to perform on COMLEX-USA Level 1 and the added stress of performing on COMLEX-USA Level 2CE. Additionally, respondents viewed the change as negatively impacting their audition rotations and subsequent residency competitiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Health Professions-Complementary and Manual Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
118
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信