异基因干细胞移植后idh突变AML患者的预后——代表德国造血干细胞移植和细胞治疗登记处(DRST)的回顾性分析。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Thomas Schroeder , Sarah Flossdorf , Claudia Schuh , Caroline Pabst , Michael Stadler , Johannes Schetelig , Claudia Wehr , Matthias Stelljes , Elisa Sala , Andreas Burchert , Julia Winkler , H. Christian Reinhardt , Nicolaus Kröger , Katharina Fleischhauer , Christina Rautenberg
{"title":"异基因干细胞移植后idh突变AML患者的预后——代表德国造血干细胞移植和细胞治疗登记处(DRST)的回顾性分析。","authors":"Thomas Schroeder ,&nbsp;Sarah Flossdorf ,&nbsp;Claudia Schuh ,&nbsp;Caroline Pabst ,&nbsp;Michael Stadler ,&nbsp;Johannes Schetelig ,&nbsp;Claudia Wehr ,&nbsp;Matthias Stelljes ,&nbsp;Elisa Sala ,&nbsp;Andreas Burchert ,&nbsp;Julia Winkler ,&nbsp;H. Christian Reinhardt ,&nbsp;Nicolaus Kröger ,&nbsp;Katharina Fleischhauer ,&nbsp;Christina Rautenberg","doi":"10.1016/j.jtct.2025.02.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 genes (<em>IDH1</em> and <em>IDH2</em>) are found in 15% to 20% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). <em>IDH</em> inhibitors have been introduced as targeted treatment and are currently under investigation as maintenance therapy after allogeneic transplantation (allo-SCT). Since reports about the outcome of <em>IDH1</em>- and <em>IDH2</em>-mutated (<em>IDH</em>mut) AML after allo-SCT are limited, we retrospectively analyzed 356 <em>IDH</em>-mutated AML patients (<em>IDH1</em> 40%, <em>IDH2</em> 60%). Ten patients (4%) had received an <em>IDH</em> inhibitor prior transplantation, but none had received maintenance with <em>IDH</em> inhibitors. After a median follow-up of 24 months 3-year probabilities of overall (OS) and event-free (EFS) survival, relapse and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) for the entire cohort were 73%, 60%, 27% and 13% respectively. While 3-year OS (78% versus 70%), EFS (56% versus 63%) and NRM (10% versus 14%) rates were similar for <em>IDH1</em>mut and <em>IDH2</em>mut patients, relapse incidence was numerically higher in <em>IDH1</em>mut patients (34% versus 24%) and landmark analysis suggested a continuous rise of relapse incidence preferentially in <em>IDH1</em>mut AML also beyond the first year. Concordantly, <em>IDH2</em> mutation was associated with superior EFS and by trend with lower relapse incidence. The strongest risk factor for adverse outcomes, however, was AML not in CR. This analysis provides benchmarks for interpretation of results emerging from post-transplant maintenance trials in <em>IDH</em>mut AML and suggest that maintenance strategies may further optimize the promising outcome in this molecularly defined subgroup by reducing relapse risk, especially for patients whose AML is not in remission at time of alloHCT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23283,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","volume":"31 5","pages":"Pages 303.e1-303.e9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome of Patients With IDH-Mutated AML Following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation—A Retrospective Analysis on Behalf of the German Registry for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cell Therapy, DRST\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Schroeder ,&nbsp;Sarah Flossdorf ,&nbsp;Claudia Schuh ,&nbsp;Caroline Pabst ,&nbsp;Michael Stadler ,&nbsp;Johannes Schetelig ,&nbsp;Claudia Wehr ,&nbsp;Matthias Stelljes ,&nbsp;Elisa Sala ,&nbsp;Andreas Burchert ,&nbsp;Julia Winkler ,&nbsp;H. Christian Reinhardt ,&nbsp;Nicolaus Kröger ,&nbsp;Katharina Fleischhauer ,&nbsp;Christina Rautenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtct.2025.02.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 genes (<em>IDH1</em> and <em>IDH2</em>) are found in 15% to 20% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). <em>IDH</em> inhibitors have been introduced as targeted treatment and are currently under investigation as maintenance therapy after allogeneic transplantation (allo-SCT). Since reports about the outcome of <em>IDH1</em>- and <em>IDH2</em>-mutated (<em>IDH</em>mut) AML after allo-SCT are limited, we retrospectively analyzed 356 <em>IDH</em>-mutated AML patients (<em>IDH1</em> 40%, <em>IDH2</em> 60%). Ten patients (4%) had received an <em>IDH</em> inhibitor prior transplantation, but none had received maintenance with <em>IDH</em> inhibitors. After a median follow-up of 24 months 3-year probabilities of overall (OS) and event-free (EFS) survival, relapse and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) for the entire cohort were 73%, 60%, 27% and 13% respectively. While 3-year OS (78% versus 70%), EFS (56% versus 63%) and NRM (10% versus 14%) rates were similar for <em>IDH1</em>mut and <em>IDH2</em>mut patients, relapse incidence was numerically higher in <em>IDH1</em>mut patients (34% versus 24%) and landmark analysis suggested a continuous rise of relapse incidence preferentially in <em>IDH1</em>mut AML also beyond the first year. Concordantly, <em>IDH2</em> mutation was associated with superior EFS and by trend with lower relapse incidence. The strongest risk factor for adverse outcomes, however, was AML not in CR. This analysis provides benchmarks for interpretation of results emerging from post-transplant maintenance trials in <em>IDH</em>mut AML and suggest that maintenance strategies may further optimize the promising outcome in this molecularly defined subgroup by reducing relapse risk, especially for patients whose AML is not in remission at time of alloHCT.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy\",\"volume\":\"31 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 303.e1-303.e9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666636725010528\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666636725010528","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

异柠檬酸脱氢酶1和2基因(IDH1和IDH2)突变在15%至20%的急性髓性白血病(AML)患者中发现。IDH抑制剂已作为靶向治疗引入,目前正在研究作为同种异体移植(alloo - sct)后的维持治疗。由于关于IDH1-和IDH2突变(IDHmut) AML在同种异体sct后预后的报道有限,我们回顾性分析了356例idh突变的AML患者(IDH1 40%, IDH2 60%)。10名患者(4%)在移植前接受了IDH抑制剂,但没有人接受IDH抑制剂维持。中位随访24个月后,整个队列的3年总生存率(OS)和无事件生存率(EFS)、复发和非复发死亡率(NRM)分别为73%、60%、27%和13%。虽然IDH1mut和IDH2mut患者的3年OS(78%对70%)、EFS(56%对63%)和NRM(10%对14%)率相似,但IDH1mut患者的复发率在数字上更高(34%对24%),并且里程碑式分析表明IDH1mut AML的复发率持续上升也超过了第一年。与此同时,IDH2突变与较好的EFS相关,并且在趋势上与较低的复发率相关。然而,不良结果的最大危险因素是非CR型AML。该分析为解释IDHmut AML移植后维持试验的结果提供了基准,并表明维持策略可以通过降低复发风险进一步优化这一分子定义亚组的有希望的结果,特别是对于同种异体hct时AML未缓解的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Outcome of Patients With IDH-Mutated AML Following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation—A Retrospective Analysis on Behalf of the German Registry for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cell Therapy, DRST

Outcome of Patients With IDH-Mutated AML Following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation—A Retrospective Analysis on Behalf of the German Registry for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cell Therapy, DRST
Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 genes (IDH1 and IDH2) are found in 15% to 20% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). IDH inhibitors have been introduced as targeted treatment and are currently under investigation as maintenance therapy after allogeneic transplantation (allo-SCT). Since reports about the outcome of IDH1- and IDH2-mutated (IDHmut) AML after allo-SCT are limited, we retrospectively analyzed 356 IDH-mutated AML patients (IDH1 40%, IDH2 60%). Ten patients (4%) had received an IDH inhibitor prior transplantation, but none had received maintenance with IDH inhibitors. After a median follow-up of 24 months 3-year probabilities of overall (OS) and event-free (EFS) survival, relapse and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) for the entire cohort were 73%, 60%, 27% and 13% respectively. While 3-year OS (78% versus 70%), EFS (56% versus 63%) and NRM (10% versus 14%) rates were similar for IDH1mut and IDH2mut patients, relapse incidence was numerically higher in IDH1mut patients (34% versus 24%) and landmark analysis suggested a continuous rise of relapse incidence preferentially in IDH1mut AML also beyond the first year. Concordantly, IDH2 mutation was associated with superior EFS and by trend with lower relapse incidence. The strongest risk factor for adverse outcomes, however, was AML not in CR. This analysis provides benchmarks for interpretation of results emerging from post-transplant maintenance trials in IDHmut AML and suggest that maintenance strategies may further optimize the promising outcome in this molecularly defined subgroup by reducing relapse risk, especially for patients whose AML is not in remission at time of alloHCT.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
15.60%
发文量
1061
审稿时长
51 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信