Samuel Anyaso-Samuel, Somnath Datta, Eva Roos, Jaakko Nevalainen
{"title":"单位大小能预测结果吗?三水平设计的信息性检验。","authors":"Samuel Anyaso-Samuel, Somnath Datta, Eva Roos, Jaakko Nevalainen","doi":"10.1002/sim.70041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multilevel data are frequently encountered in biomedical research, and several statistical methods have been developed to analyze such data. Informativeness of the number of units on certain levels often manifests itself in multilevel data analysis and failure to account for this phenomenon will lead to biased inference. Moreover, utilizing an incorrect marginalization approach will also lead to invalid conclusions. To identify the appropriate marginal distribution to be tested in multilevel designs, we propose a sequential testing procedure to test for informativeness of unit sizes in multilevel structures with three levels. At a given level of the design, a bootstrap method is developed to estimate the null distribution of no informativeness of unit size. Simulation studies confirm the efficacy of our sequential procedure in maintaining an overall Type I error rate. Additionally, we extend our testing procedure to a multilevel regression setting, enhancing its practical applicability. We demonstrate the utility of our proposed methods through the analysis of data from a study on periodontal disease and a study on stress levels of preschoolers.</p>","PeriodicalId":21879,"journal":{"name":"Statistics in Medicine","volume":"44 6","pages":"e70041"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can the Unit Size Predict Outcomes? Testing for Informativeness in Three-Level Designs.\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Anyaso-Samuel, Somnath Datta, Eva Roos, Jaakko Nevalainen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/sim.70041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Multilevel data are frequently encountered in biomedical research, and several statistical methods have been developed to analyze such data. Informativeness of the number of units on certain levels often manifests itself in multilevel data analysis and failure to account for this phenomenon will lead to biased inference. Moreover, utilizing an incorrect marginalization approach will also lead to invalid conclusions. To identify the appropriate marginal distribution to be tested in multilevel designs, we propose a sequential testing procedure to test for informativeness of unit sizes in multilevel structures with three levels. At a given level of the design, a bootstrap method is developed to estimate the null distribution of no informativeness of unit size. Simulation studies confirm the efficacy of our sequential procedure in maintaining an overall Type I error rate. Additionally, we extend our testing procedure to a multilevel regression setting, enhancing its practical applicability. We demonstrate the utility of our proposed methods through the analysis of data from a study on periodontal disease and a study on stress levels of preschoolers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statistics in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"44 6\",\"pages\":\"e70041\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statistics in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70041\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70041","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Can the Unit Size Predict Outcomes? Testing for Informativeness in Three-Level Designs.
Multilevel data are frequently encountered in biomedical research, and several statistical methods have been developed to analyze such data. Informativeness of the number of units on certain levels often manifests itself in multilevel data analysis and failure to account for this phenomenon will lead to biased inference. Moreover, utilizing an incorrect marginalization approach will also lead to invalid conclusions. To identify the appropriate marginal distribution to be tested in multilevel designs, we propose a sequential testing procedure to test for informativeness of unit sizes in multilevel structures with three levels. At a given level of the design, a bootstrap method is developed to estimate the null distribution of no informativeness of unit size. Simulation studies confirm the efficacy of our sequential procedure in maintaining an overall Type I error rate. Additionally, we extend our testing procedure to a multilevel regression setting, enhancing its practical applicability. We demonstrate the utility of our proposed methods through the analysis of data from a study on periodontal disease and a study on stress levels of preschoolers.
期刊介绍:
The journal aims to influence practice in medicine and its associated sciences through the publication of papers on statistical and other quantitative methods. Papers will explain new methods and demonstrate their application, preferably through a substantive, real, motivating example or a comprehensive evaluation based on an illustrative example. Alternatively, papers will report on case-studies where creative use or technical generalizations of established methodology is directed towards a substantive application. Reviews of, and tutorials on, general topics relevant to the application of statistics to medicine will also be published. The main criteria for publication are appropriateness of the statistical methods to a particular medical problem and clarity of exposition. Papers with primarily mathematical content will be excluded. The journal aims to enhance communication between statisticians, clinicians and medical researchers.