单位大小能预测结果吗?三水平设计的信息性检验。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Samuel Anyaso-Samuel, Somnath Datta, Eva Roos, Jaakko Nevalainen
{"title":"单位大小能预测结果吗?三水平设计的信息性检验。","authors":"Samuel Anyaso-Samuel, Somnath Datta, Eva Roos, Jaakko Nevalainen","doi":"10.1002/sim.70041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multilevel data are frequently encountered in biomedical research, and several statistical methods have been developed to analyze such data. Informativeness of the number of units on certain levels often manifests itself in multilevel data analysis and failure to account for this phenomenon will lead to biased inference. Moreover, utilizing an incorrect marginalization approach will also lead to invalid conclusions. To identify the appropriate marginal distribution to be tested in multilevel designs, we propose a sequential testing procedure to test for informativeness of unit sizes in multilevel structures with three levels. At a given level of the design, a bootstrap method is developed to estimate the null distribution of no informativeness of unit size. Simulation studies confirm the efficacy of our sequential procedure in maintaining an overall Type I error rate. Additionally, we extend our testing procedure to a multilevel regression setting, enhancing its practical applicability. We demonstrate the utility of our proposed methods through the analysis of data from a study on periodontal disease and a study on stress levels of preschoolers.</p>","PeriodicalId":21879,"journal":{"name":"Statistics in Medicine","volume":"44 6","pages":"e70041"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can the Unit Size Predict Outcomes? Testing for Informativeness in Three-Level Designs.\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Anyaso-Samuel, Somnath Datta, Eva Roos, Jaakko Nevalainen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/sim.70041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Multilevel data are frequently encountered in biomedical research, and several statistical methods have been developed to analyze such data. Informativeness of the number of units on certain levels often manifests itself in multilevel data analysis and failure to account for this phenomenon will lead to biased inference. Moreover, utilizing an incorrect marginalization approach will also lead to invalid conclusions. To identify the appropriate marginal distribution to be tested in multilevel designs, we propose a sequential testing procedure to test for informativeness of unit sizes in multilevel structures with three levels. At a given level of the design, a bootstrap method is developed to estimate the null distribution of no informativeness of unit size. Simulation studies confirm the efficacy of our sequential procedure in maintaining an overall Type I error rate. Additionally, we extend our testing procedure to a multilevel regression setting, enhancing its practical applicability. We demonstrate the utility of our proposed methods through the analysis of data from a study on periodontal disease and a study on stress levels of preschoolers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statistics in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"44 6\",\"pages\":\"e70041\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statistics in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70041\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70041","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在生物医学研究中经常遇到多层次数据,并且已经开发了几种统计方法来分析这些数据。在多层数据分析中,一定层次上的单位数量的信息性往往会表现出来,如果不能考虑到这一现象,就会导致有偏见的推断。此外,采用不正确的边缘化方法也会导致无效的结论。为了确定要在多层设计中进行测试的适当边际分布,我们提出了一个顺序测试程序来测试具有三个层次的多层结构中单位尺寸的信息量。在给定的设计水平上,开发了一种自举方法来估计单位大小无信息性的零分布。仿真研究证实了我们的顺序程序在维持总体I型错误率方面的有效性。此外,我们将测试程序扩展到多水平回归设置,增强其实际适用性。我们通过对一项牙周病研究和一项学龄前儿童压力水平研究的数据分析,证明了我们提出的方法的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can the Unit Size Predict Outcomes? Testing for Informativeness in Three-Level Designs.

Multilevel data are frequently encountered in biomedical research, and several statistical methods have been developed to analyze such data. Informativeness of the number of units on certain levels often manifests itself in multilevel data analysis and failure to account for this phenomenon will lead to biased inference. Moreover, utilizing an incorrect marginalization approach will also lead to invalid conclusions. To identify the appropriate marginal distribution to be tested in multilevel designs, we propose a sequential testing procedure to test for informativeness of unit sizes in multilevel structures with three levels. At a given level of the design, a bootstrap method is developed to estimate the null distribution of no informativeness of unit size. Simulation studies confirm the efficacy of our sequential procedure in maintaining an overall Type I error rate. Additionally, we extend our testing procedure to a multilevel regression setting, enhancing its practical applicability. We demonstrate the utility of our proposed methods through the analysis of data from a study on periodontal disease and a study on stress levels of preschoolers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Statistics in Medicine
Statistics in Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
334
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal aims to influence practice in medicine and its associated sciences through the publication of papers on statistical and other quantitative methods. Papers will explain new methods and demonstrate their application, preferably through a substantive, real, motivating example or a comprehensive evaluation based on an illustrative example. Alternatively, papers will report on case-studies where creative use or technical generalizations of established methodology is directed towards a substantive application. Reviews of, and tutorials on, general topics relevant to the application of statistics to medicine will also be published. The main criteria for publication are appropriateness of the statistical methods to a particular medical problem and clarity of exposition. Papers with primarily mathematical content will be excluded. The journal aims to enhance communication between statisticians, clinicians and medical researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信