探索儿科共享决策培训:范围综述。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Vanessa I. Orellana-Villazon MD, MPH, MSc , Jennifer E. deSante-Bertkau MD, MBE , Noah Smith BS , Melissa Previtera MLIS , Ellen A. Lipstein MD, MPH
{"title":"探索儿科共享决策培训:范围综述。","authors":"Vanessa I. Orellana-Villazon MD, MPH, MSc ,&nbsp;Jennifer E. deSante-Bertkau MD, MBE ,&nbsp;Noah Smith BS ,&nbsp;Melissa Previtera MLIS ,&nbsp;Ellen A. Lipstein MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.acap.2025.102805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Shared decision-making (SDM) is crucial in pediatric care, but its implementation poses unique challenges. Training health care professionals in pediatric SDM is essential, yet little is known about the current state of these training programs.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Review existing pediatric-specific SDM training programs to understand the current state of training and identify areas for improvement.</div></div><div><h3>Data Sources</h3><div>Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Education Research Complete, and LILACS.</div></div><div><h3>Eligibility Criteria</h3><div>We included original research publications in English, Spanish, and German that focused on SDM training involving pediatric health care professionals or evaluated SDM training within pediatric settings.</div></div><div><h3>Data Extraction</h3><div>We used a custom Covidence template to extract data on publication year, author, SDM focus, participants, curriculum design, teaching strategies, evaluated outcomes, and how the curriculum incorporated children's participation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Most programs were from North America and published after 2018. Training approaches varied widely, with many focusing on specific clinical contexts. Only 2 curricula explicitly considered children as participants in the SDM process. Evaluation methods and outcomes varied across Kirkpatrick levels, with most programs reporting positive results in participant satisfaction, skill improvement, and patient outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>Only papers in English, Spanish, and German were included in the search.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>While progress has been made in developing pediatric SDM training programs, there is a need for more consistency in content and evaluation methods. Future pediatric SDM training programs should prepare health care professionals with the skills necessary to involve children in the SDM process when appropriate.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50930,"journal":{"name":"Academic Pediatrics","volume":"25 4","pages":"Article 102805"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Shared Decision-Making Training in Pediatrics: A Scoping Review\",\"authors\":\"Vanessa I. Orellana-Villazon MD, MPH, MSc ,&nbsp;Jennifer E. deSante-Bertkau MD, MBE ,&nbsp;Noah Smith BS ,&nbsp;Melissa Previtera MLIS ,&nbsp;Ellen A. Lipstein MD, MPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acap.2025.102805\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Shared decision-making (SDM) is crucial in pediatric care, but its implementation poses unique challenges. Training health care professionals in pediatric SDM is essential, yet little is known about the current state of these training programs.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Review existing pediatric-specific SDM training programs to understand the current state of training and identify areas for improvement.</div></div><div><h3>Data Sources</h3><div>Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Education Research Complete, and LILACS.</div></div><div><h3>Eligibility Criteria</h3><div>We included original research publications in English, Spanish, and German that focused on SDM training involving pediatric health care professionals or evaluated SDM training within pediatric settings.</div></div><div><h3>Data Extraction</h3><div>We used a custom Covidence template to extract data on publication year, author, SDM focus, participants, curriculum design, teaching strategies, evaluated outcomes, and how the curriculum incorporated children's participation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Most programs were from North America and published after 2018. Training approaches varied widely, with many focusing on specific clinical contexts. Only 2 curricula explicitly considered children as participants in the SDM process. Evaluation methods and outcomes varied across Kirkpatrick levels, with most programs reporting positive results in participant satisfaction, skill improvement, and patient outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>Only papers in English, Spanish, and German were included in the search.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>While progress has been made in developing pediatric SDM training programs, there is a need for more consistency in content and evaluation methods. Future pediatric SDM training programs should prepare health care professionals with the skills necessary to involve children in the SDM process when appropriate.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 102805\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876285925000300\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876285925000300","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:共同决策(SDM)在儿科护理中至关重要,但其实施面临着独特的挑战。培训医疗保健专业人员在儿科SDM是必不可少的,但很少了解这些培训计划的现状。目的:回顾现有儿科特定SDM培训计划,了解培训现状并确定需要改进的领域。数据来源:Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Education Research Complete,和LILACS。入选标准:我们纳入了英语、西班牙语和德语的原始研究出版物,这些出版物主要关注涉及儿科医疗保健专业人员的SDM培训或评估儿科环境中的SDM培训。数据提取:我们使用自定义的covid模板提取有关出版年份、作者、SDM重点、参与者、课程设计、教学策略、评估结果以及课程如何纳入儿童参与的数据。结果:19项研究符合纳入标准。大多数节目来自北美,在2018年之后发布。培训方法多种多样,许多侧重于特定的临床背景。只有两门课程明确将儿童视为SDM进程的参与者。评估方法和结果因Kirkpatrick水平而异,大多数项目在参与者满意度、技能提高和患者预后方面报告了积极的结果。限制:只有英语、西班牙语和德语的论文被纳入搜索。结论:虽然在制定儿科SDM培训计划方面取得了进展,但在内容和评估方法方面需要更加一致。未来的儿科SDM培训计划应使医疗保健专业人员具备必要的技能,以便在适当的时候让儿童参与SDM过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring Shared Decision-Making Training in Pediatrics: A Scoping Review

Background

Shared decision-making (SDM) is crucial in pediatric care, but its implementation poses unique challenges. Training health care professionals in pediatric SDM is essential, yet little is known about the current state of these training programs.

Objective

Review existing pediatric-specific SDM training programs to understand the current state of training and identify areas for improvement.

Data Sources

Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Education Research Complete, and LILACS.

Eligibility Criteria

We included original research publications in English, Spanish, and German that focused on SDM training involving pediatric health care professionals or evaluated SDM training within pediatric settings.

Data Extraction

We used a custom Covidence template to extract data on publication year, author, SDM focus, participants, curriculum design, teaching strategies, evaluated outcomes, and how the curriculum incorporated children's participation.

Results

Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Most programs were from North America and published after 2018. Training approaches varied widely, with many focusing on specific clinical contexts. Only 2 curricula explicitly considered children as participants in the SDM process. Evaluation methods and outcomes varied across Kirkpatrick levels, with most programs reporting positive results in participant satisfaction, skill improvement, and patient outcomes.

Limitations

Only papers in English, Spanish, and German were included in the search.

Conclusions

While progress has been made in developing pediatric SDM training programs, there is a need for more consistency in content and evaluation methods. Future pediatric SDM training programs should prepare health care professionals with the skills necessary to involve children in the SDM process when appropriate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Pediatrics
Academic Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.90%
发文量
300
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Academic Pediatrics, the official journal of the Academic Pediatric Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to strengthen the research and educational base of academic general pediatrics. The journal provides leadership in pediatric education, research, patient care and advocacy. Content areas include pediatric education, emergency medicine, injury, abuse, behavioral pediatrics, holistic medicine, child health services and health policy,and the environment. The journal provides an active forum for the presentation of pediatric educational research in diverse settings, involving medical students, residents, fellows, and practicing professionals. The journal also emphasizes important research relating to the quality of child health care, health care policy, and the organization of child health services. It also includes systematic reviews of primary care interventions and important methodologic papers to aid research in child health and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信