Ling Luo, Tyler Weiss, Andrea D Zorce, Sara Mirza, Jacob Rintz, Xiukai Chen, Jie Li
{"title":"呼吸治疗师肺部超声训练。","authors":"Ling Luo, Tyler Weiss, Andrea D Zorce, Sara Mirza, Jacob Rintz, Xiukai Chen, Jie Li","doi":"10.1089/respcare.12291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Bedside ultrasound is widely utilized for critically ill patients, yet there is no standardized approach for teaching lung ultrasound to medical staff, particularly respiratory therapists (RTs), in the United States. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a lung ultrasound training program designed for RTs. <b>Methods:</b> With approval from the ethics committee, we recruited RTs with over 3 months of experience at Rush University Medical Center to participate in our lung ultrasound training program. The program comprised of a 1-h didactic lecture followed by hands-on practice on a healthy volunteer. A refresher training session was provided 6-9 months later for those who remained interested in lung ultrasound and were still employed at Rush University Medical Center. Pre- and post-training assessments were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the training and identify areas requiring further knowledge development. <b>Results:</b> Between October 2022 and April 2023, 23 RTs completed the initial training, and 7 attended both the initial and the refresher training sessions. Following the initial session, total scores significantly improved (post-training 11.0 [9.0-14.0] versus pre-training 1.0 [0-2.0], <i>P</i> < .001), with the subgroup focusing on \"identification of patterns\" achieving the highest percentage of correct answers. Among the 7 RTs who attended the refresher training, total scores significantly decreased over 6-9 months (12.9 ± 2.3 vs 4.4 ± 1.8, <i>P</i> = .001). However, scores significantly rebounded after the refresher training (post-training 11.3 ± 3.1 vs pre-training 4.4 ± 1.8, <i>P</i> = .008), with no significant difference in post-training total scores between the initial and the refresher sessions. <b>Conclusions:</b> Both the initial and refresher training sessions of our lung ultrasound training programs effectively improved participants' knowledge. The observed decline in knowledge retention over 6-9 months highlights the necessity for periodic refresher courses and ongoing use of lung ultrasound in clinical practice to maintain skills. Incorporating a visual format may be beneficial for acquiring and retaining knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lung Ultrasound Training for Respiratory Therapists.\",\"authors\":\"Ling Luo, Tyler Weiss, Andrea D Zorce, Sara Mirza, Jacob Rintz, Xiukai Chen, Jie Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/respcare.12291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Bedside ultrasound is widely utilized for critically ill patients, yet there is no standardized approach for teaching lung ultrasound to medical staff, particularly respiratory therapists (RTs), in the United States. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a lung ultrasound training program designed for RTs. <b>Methods:</b> With approval from the ethics committee, we recruited RTs with over 3 months of experience at Rush University Medical Center to participate in our lung ultrasound training program. The program comprised of a 1-h didactic lecture followed by hands-on practice on a healthy volunteer. A refresher training session was provided 6-9 months later for those who remained interested in lung ultrasound and were still employed at Rush University Medical Center. Pre- and post-training assessments were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the training and identify areas requiring further knowledge development. <b>Results:</b> Between October 2022 and April 2023, 23 RTs completed the initial training, and 7 attended both the initial and the refresher training sessions. Following the initial session, total scores significantly improved (post-training 11.0 [9.0-14.0] versus pre-training 1.0 [0-2.0], <i>P</i> < .001), with the subgroup focusing on \\\"identification of patterns\\\" achieving the highest percentage of correct answers. Among the 7 RTs who attended the refresher training, total scores significantly decreased over 6-9 months (12.9 ± 2.3 vs 4.4 ± 1.8, <i>P</i> = .001). However, scores significantly rebounded after the refresher training (post-training 11.3 ± 3.1 vs pre-training 4.4 ± 1.8, <i>P</i> = .008), with no significant difference in post-training total scores between the initial and the refresher sessions. <b>Conclusions:</b> Both the initial and refresher training sessions of our lung ultrasound training programs effectively improved participants' knowledge. The observed decline in knowledge retention over 6-9 months highlights the necessity for periodic refresher courses and ongoing use of lung ultrasound in clinical practice to maintain skills. Incorporating a visual format may be beneficial for acquiring and retaining knowledge.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/respcare.12291\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/respcare.12291","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:床边超声广泛应用于危重患者,但在美国,对医务人员,特别是呼吸治疗师(RTs)进行肺超声教学尚无标准化的方法。因此,我们旨在评估为RTs设计的肺部超声训练计划的疗效。方法:经伦理委员会批准,我们招募了在拉什大学医学中心有3个月以上工作经验的RTs患者参加我们的肺部超声培训项目。该计划包括1小时的教学讲座,然后是对健康志愿者的动手实践。6-9个月后,对那些仍然对肺超声感兴趣并仍在拉什大学医学中心工作的人提供了一个复习培训课程。培训前和培训后进行了评估,以评估培训的有效性,并确定需要进一步发展知识的领域。结果:在2022年10月至2023年4月期间,23名RTs完成了初始培训,7名RTs同时参加了初始培训和进修培训。在第一次训练之后,总得分显著提高(训练后11.0[9.0-14.0]与训练前1.0[0-2.0]相比,P < .001),其中专注于“识别模式”的小组获得了最高的正确答案百分比。在参加进修培训的7名RTs中,总得分在6-9个月内显著下降(12.9±2.3 vs 4.4±1.8,P = .001)。然而,复习训练后得分明显回升(训练后11.3±3.1 vs训练前4.4±1.8,P = 0.008),训练后总分与复习训练后总分无显著差异。结论:肺超声培训项目的初级培训和进修培训都有效地提高了参与者的知识水平。在6-9个月内观察到的知识保留的下降突出了定期进修课程和在临床实践中持续使用肺部超声来保持技能的必要性。结合视觉形式可能有利于获取和保留知识。
Lung Ultrasound Training for Respiratory Therapists.
Background: Bedside ultrasound is widely utilized for critically ill patients, yet there is no standardized approach for teaching lung ultrasound to medical staff, particularly respiratory therapists (RTs), in the United States. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a lung ultrasound training program designed for RTs. Methods: With approval from the ethics committee, we recruited RTs with over 3 months of experience at Rush University Medical Center to participate in our lung ultrasound training program. The program comprised of a 1-h didactic lecture followed by hands-on practice on a healthy volunteer. A refresher training session was provided 6-9 months later for those who remained interested in lung ultrasound and were still employed at Rush University Medical Center. Pre- and post-training assessments were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the training and identify areas requiring further knowledge development. Results: Between October 2022 and April 2023, 23 RTs completed the initial training, and 7 attended both the initial and the refresher training sessions. Following the initial session, total scores significantly improved (post-training 11.0 [9.0-14.0] versus pre-training 1.0 [0-2.0], P < .001), with the subgroup focusing on "identification of patterns" achieving the highest percentage of correct answers. Among the 7 RTs who attended the refresher training, total scores significantly decreased over 6-9 months (12.9 ± 2.3 vs 4.4 ± 1.8, P = .001). However, scores significantly rebounded after the refresher training (post-training 11.3 ± 3.1 vs pre-training 4.4 ± 1.8, P = .008), with no significant difference in post-training total scores between the initial and the refresher sessions. Conclusions: Both the initial and refresher training sessions of our lung ultrasound training programs effectively improved participants' knowledge. The observed decline in knowledge retention over 6-9 months highlights the necessity for periodic refresher courses and ongoing use of lung ultrasound in clinical practice to maintain skills. Incorporating a visual format may be beneficial for acquiring and retaining knowledge.
期刊介绍:
RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.