具有嵌入式实验室子研究的年轻新兵弹性的前瞻性纵向研究的可行性:ARMOR试点试验。

IF 1.6 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Andrea C Hitz, Michelle Hubbling, Annika Hodges, Emily Hagel Campbell, Ann Bangerter, Melissa A Polusny
{"title":"具有嵌入式实验室子研究的年轻新兵弹性的前瞻性纵向研究的可行性:ARMOR试点试验。","authors":"Andrea C Hitz, Michelle Hubbling, Annika Hodges, Emily Hagel Campbell, Ann Bangerter, Melissa A Polusny","doi":"10.1186/s40814-024-01573-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite extensive resilience research with military personnel, progress in developing effective resilience-specific interventions for military service members (MSM) has been limited. To inform the design of effective prevention and intervention strategies, a better understanding of the neurocognitive, behavioral, and social processes associated with resilience is needed. This paper reports on a pilot study testing the feasibility of methods and procedures, to be used in the Advancing Research on Mechanisms of Resilience (ARMOR) longitudinal cohort study. Pilot trial objectives were to evaluate the feasibility of recruitment, retention, and data collection against pre-specified progression criteria for determining whether to proceed with the large-scale study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This pilot trial used a pre-test/post-test design with an embedded laboratory sub-study. Participants were young recruits who had recently enlisted in the US Army National Guard and had not yet shipped to Basic Combat Training (BCT). Recruitment and baseline data collection at local armories involved computerized self-report measures and neurocognitive tests. Participants completed a web-based follow-up survey on personal devices after BCT. A subset of participants was recruited to complete laboratory procedures pre- and post-BCT, including clinical interviews and neurobehavioral tasks. To evaluate the feasibility of collecting real-time assessments of military stressors, participants were randomized to receive web-based surveys during BCT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 105 military service members approached, 101 (96.2%) were recruited. Baseline data collection and retention methods were considered feasible; the response rate to the follow-up survey was over 70%. Recruitment and data collection for the laboratory sub-study were also considered feasible; more than 90% of participants completed follow-up laboratory visits. The collection of web-based surveys during BCT and computerized neurocognitive testing at follow-up was not considered feasible; the large-scale study will remove these components.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Progression to the large-scale trial, with design refinements, was concluded. Lessons learned and recommendations for future research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":20176,"journal":{"name":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","volume":"11 1","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11889792/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of a prospective, longitudinal study of resilience among young military recruits with an embedded laboratory sub-study: the ARMOR pilot trial.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea C Hitz, Michelle Hubbling, Annika Hodges, Emily Hagel Campbell, Ann Bangerter, Melissa A Polusny\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40814-024-01573-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite extensive resilience research with military personnel, progress in developing effective resilience-specific interventions for military service members (MSM) has been limited. To inform the design of effective prevention and intervention strategies, a better understanding of the neurocognitive, behavioral, and social processes associated with resilience is needed. This paper reports on a pilot study testing the feasibility of methods and procedures, to be used in the Advancing Research on Mechanisms of Resilience (ARMOR) longitudinal cohort study. Pilot trial objectives were to evaluate the feasibility of recruitment, retention, and data collection against pre-specified progression criteria for determining whether to proceed with the large-scale study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This pilot trial used a pre-test/post-test design with an embedded laboratory sub-study. Participants were young recruits who had recently enlisted in the US Army National Guard and had not yet shipped to Basic Combat Training (BCT). Recruitment and baseline data collection at local armories involved computerized self-report measures and neurocognitive tests. Participants completed a web-based follow-up survey on personal devices after BCT. A subset of participants was recruited to complete laboratory procedures pre- and post-BCT, including clinical interviews and neurobehavioral tasks. To evaluate the feasibility of collecting real-time assessments of military stressors, participants were randomized to receive web-based surveys during BCT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 105 military service members approached, 101 (96.2%) were recruited. Baseline data collection and retention methods were considered feasible; the response rate to the follow-up survey was over 70%. Recruitment and data collection for the laboratory sub-study were also considered feasible; more than 90% of participants completed follow-up laboratory visits. The collection of web-based surveys during BCT and computerized neurocognitive testing at follow-up was not considered feasible; the large-scale study will remove these components.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Progression to the large-scale trial, with design refinements, was concluded. Lessons learned and recommendations for future research are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pilot and Feasibility Studies\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11889792/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pilot and Feasibility Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-024-01573-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-024-01573-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管对军事人员进行了广泛的弹性研究,但在为军事服务人员(MSM)开发有效的弹性特定干预措施方面进展有限。为了设计有效的预防和干预策略,需要更好地了解与恢复力相关的神经认知、行为和社会过程。本文报告了一项试点研究,测试了方法和程序的可行性,用于弹性机制的推进研究(ARMOR)纵向队列研究。试点试验的目的是根据预先规定的进展标准评估招募、保留和数据收集的可行性,以确定是否继续进行大规模研究。方法:本试验采用前测/后测设计,并嵌入实验室子研究。参与者是最近加入美国陆军国民警卫队的年轻新兵,尚未参加基本战斗训练(BCT)。当地军械库的招募和基线数据收集涉及计算机自我报告测量和神经认知测试。参与者在BCT后完成了一项基于网络的个人设备跟踪调查。一部分参与者被招募来完成bct前后的实验室程序,包括临床访谈和神经行为任务。为了评估收集军事压力源实时评估的可行性,参与者在BCT期间随机接受基于网络的调查。结果:在接触的105名军人中,有101人(96.2%)被录用。基线数据收集和保留方法被认为是可行的;随访调查的回复率超过70%。实验室次级研究的招募和数据收集也被认为是可行的;超过90%的参与者完成了后续的实验室访问。在BCT期间收集基于网络的调查和在随访时进行计算机神经认知测试被认为是不可行的;大规模的研究将消除这些成分。结论:大规模试验的进展,设计的改进,已经结束。讨论了经验教训和对未来研究的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Feasibility of a prospective, longitudinal study of resilience among young military recruits with an embedded laboratory sub-study: the ARMOR pilot trial.

Feasibility of a prospective, longitudinal study of resilience among young military recruits with an embedded laboratory sub-study: the ARMOR pilot trial.

Background: Despite extensive resilience research with military personnel, progress in developing effective resilience-specific interventions for military service members (MSM) has been limited. To inform the design of effective prevention and intervention strategies, a better understanding of the neurocognitive, behavioral, and social processes associated with resilience is needed. This paper reports on a pilot study testing the feasibility of methods and procedures, to be used in the Advancing Research on Mechanisms of Resilience (ARMOR) longitudinal cohort study. Pilot trial objectives were to evaluate the feasibility of recruitment, retention, and data collection against pre-specified progression criteria for determining whether to proceed with the large-scale study.

Methods: This pilot trial used a pre-test/post-test design with an embedded laboratory sub-study. Participants were young recruits who had recently enlisted in the US Army National Guard and had not yet shipped to Basic Combat Training (BCT). Recruitment and baseline data collection at local armories involved computerized self-report measures and neurocognitive tests. Participants completed a web-based follow-up survey on personal devices after BCT. A subset of participants was recruited to complete laboratory procedures pre- and post-BCT, including clinical interviews and neurobehavioral tasks. To evaluate the feasibility of collecting real-time assessments of military stressors, participants were randomized to receive web-based surveys during BCT.

Results: Among the 105 military service members approached, 101 (96.2%) were recruited. Baseline data collection and retention methods were considered feasible; the response rate to the follow-up survey was over 70%. Recruitment and data collection for the laboratory sub-study were also considered feasible; more than 90% of participants completed follow-up laboratory visits. The collection of web-based surveys during BCT and computerized neurocognitive testing at follow-up was not considered feasible; the large-scale study will remove these components.

Conclusions: Progression to the large-scale trial, with design refinements, was concluded. Lessons learned and recommendations for future research are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Pilot and Feasibility Studies Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
241
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Pilot and Feasibility Studies encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of pilot and feasibility studies in biomedicine. The journal publishes research articles that are intended to directly influence future clinical trials or large scale observational studies, as well as protocols, commentaries and methodology articles. The journal also ensures that the results of all well-conducted, peer-reviewed, pilot and feasibility studies are published, regardless of outcome or significance of findings. Pilot and feasibility studies are increasingly conducted prior to a full randomized controlled trial. However, these studies often lack clear objectives, many remain unpublished, and there is confusion over the meanings of the words “pilot” and “feasibility”. Pilot and Feasibility Studies provides a forum for discussion around this key aspect of the scientific process, and seeks to ensure that these studies are published, so as to complete the publication thread for clinical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信