Abdallah Abbas, Moaz Abouelmagd, Mohamed El-Moslemani, Ahmed Diaa, Ahmed Samir, Mohamed Hatem Ellabban, Ali Bakr, Amira M Taha, Mahmoud Tarek Hefnawy, Mostafa Hossam El Din Moawad, Dina Essam Abo-Elnour, Amna Hussein, Hoda Awad, Alaa Rashad, Ahmed Negida, Ahmed M Raslan
{"title":"评估脊髓刺激治疗疼痛性糖尿病神经病变的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Abdallah Abbas, Moaz Abouelmagd, Mohamed El-Moslemani, Ahmed Diaa, Ahmed Samir, Mohamed Hatem Ellabban, Ali Bakr, Amira M Taha, Mahmoud Tarek Hefnawy, Mostafa Hossam El Din Moawad, Dina Essam Abo-Elnour, Amna Hussein, Hoda Awad, Alaa Rashad, Ahmed Negida, Ahmed M Raslan","doi":"10.1016/j.neurom.2025.01.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetes mellitus affects more than half a billion people globally, often leading to painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN). Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has emerged as a promising treatment for PDN.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of SCS compared with the best medical therapy (BMT) for PDN.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Following the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic search of the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL data bases was conducted up to December 1, 2023 and updated on January 2, 2025. Data extraction was performed using Microsoft Excel, and quality assessment was conducted using Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2.0 and ROBINS-1 tools. Statistical analysis and heterogeneity assessment were performed using Review Manager (RevMan) software (The Cochrane Collaboration, London, UK).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine clinical trials involving 407 patients were included. The analysis revealed significant pain reduction in the SCS group (mean difference [MD]: -5.46, 95% CI: [-6.09, -4.83], p < 0.00001). Subgroup analysis indicated pain relief benefits in both conventional SCS (MD: -4.176, 95% CI: [-4.865, -3.486], p < 0.001) and 10-kHz SCS (MD: -4.581, 95% CI: [-6.376, -2.785], p < 0.001). SCS also achieved higher treatment success rates (≥50% pain relief) than did BMT (risk difference: 0.59, 95% CI: [0.33, 0.85], p < 0.00001). Moreover, SCS significantly improved the EuroQol-5 Dimension utility index (MD: 0.16, 95% CI: [0.10, 0.23], p < 0.00001) and self-reported health (MD: 15.29, 95% CI: [4.51, 26.07], p = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis provides robust evidence supporting SCS as an effective intervention for managing chronic pain and enhancing the quality of life in patients with PDN, highlighting its superiority to conventional medical therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19152,"journal":{"name":"Neuromodulation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Efficacy of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Managing Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Abdallah Abbas, Moaz Abouelmagd, Mohamed El-Moslemani, Ahmed Diaa, Ahmed Samir, Mohamed Hatem Ellabban, Ali Bakr, Amira M Taha, Mahmoud Tarek Hefnawy, Mostafa Hossam El Din Moawad, Dina Essam Abo-Elnour, Amna Hussein, Hoda Awad, Alaa Rashad, Ahmed Negida, Ahmed M Raslan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neurom.2025.01.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetes mellitus affects more than half a billion people globally, often leading to painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN). Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has emerged as a promising treatment for PDN.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of SCS compared with the best medical therapy (BMT) for PDN.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Following the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic search of the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL data bases was conducted up to December 1, 2023 and updated on January 2, 2025. Data extraction was performed using Microsoft Excel, and quality assessment was conducted using Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2.0 and ROBINS-1 tools. Statistical analysis and heterogeneity assessment were performed using Review Manager (RevMan) software (The Cochrane Collaboration, London, UK).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine clinical trials involving 407 patients were included. The analysis revealed significant pain reduction in the SCS group (mean difference [MD]: -5.46, 95% CI: [-6.09, -4.83], p < 0.00001). Subgroup analysis indicated pain relief benefits in both conventional SCS (MD: -4.176, 95% CI: [-4.865, -3.486], p < 0.001) and 10-kHz SCS (MD: -4.581, 95% CI: [-6.376, -2.785], p < 0.001). SCS also achieved higher treatment success rates (≥50% pain relief) than did BMT (risk difference: 0.59, 95% CI: [0.33, 0.85], p < 0.00001). Moreover, SCS significantly improved the EuroQol-5 Dimension utility index (MD: 0.16, 95% CI: [0.10, 0.23], p < 0.00001) and self-reported health (MD: 15.29, 95% CI: [4.51, 26.07], p = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis provides robust evidence supporting SCS as an effective intervention for managing chronic pain and enhancing the quality of life in patients with PDN, highlighting its superiority to conventional medical therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuromodulation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuromodulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurom.2025.01.016\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuromodulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurom.2025.01.016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:糖尿病影响全球超过5亿人,通常导致疼痛性糖尿病神经病变(PDN)。脊髓刺激(SCS)已成为一种有前途的治疗PDN的方法。目的:本荟萃分析评估SCS与最佳药物治疗(BMT)对PDN的疗效。材料和方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目,系统检索PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase和Cochrane CENTRAL数据库,截止到2023年12月1日,并于2025年1月2日更新。使用Microsoft Excel进行数据提取,使用Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2.0和ROBINS-1工具进行质量评价。使用Review Manager (RevMan)软件(The Cochrane Collaboration, London, UK)进行统计分析和异质性评估。结果:纳入9项临床试验,407例患者。分析显示,SCS组疼痛明显减轻(平均差异[MD]: -5.46, 95% CI: [-6.09, -4.83], p < 0.00001)。亚组分析表明,常规SCS (MD: -4.176, 95% CI: [-4.865, -3.486], p < 0.001)和10-kHz SCS (MD: -4.581, 95% CI: [-6.376, -2.785], p < 0.001)均有疼痛缓解效果。与BMT相比,SCS的治疗成功率更高(≥50%的疼痛缓解)(风险差异:0.59,95% CI: [0.33, 0.85], p < 0.00001)。此外,SCS显著改善了EuroQol-5维度效用指数(MD: 0.16, 95% CI: [0.10, 0.23], p < 0.00001)和自我报告健康(MD: 15.29, 95% CI: [4.51, 26.07], p = 0.005)。结论:本荟萃分析提供了强有力的证据,支持SCS作为治疗PDN患者慢性疼痛和提高生活质量的有效干预措施,突出了其优于传统药物治疗的优势。
Assessing the Efficacy of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Managing Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Background: Diabetes mellitus affects more than half a billion people globally, often leading to painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN). Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has emerged as a promising treatment for PDN.
Objective: This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of SCS compared with the best medical therapy (BMT) for PDN.
Materials and methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic search of the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL data bases was conducted up to December 1, 2023 and updated on January 2, 2025. Data extraction was performed using Microsoft Excel, and quality assessment was conducted using Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2.0 and ROBINS-1 tools. Statistical analysis and heterogeneity assessment were performed using Review Manager (RevMan) software (The Cochrane Collaboration, London, UK).
Results: Nine clinical trials involving 407 patients were included. The analysis revealed significant pain reduction in the SCS group (mean difference [MD]: -5.46, 95% CI: [-6.09, -4.83], p < 0.00001). Subgroup analysis indicated pain relief benefits in both conventional SCS (MD: -4.176, 95% CI: [-4.865, -3.486], p < 0.001) and 10-kHz SCS (MD: -4.581, 95% CI: [-6.376, -2.785], p < 0.001). SCS also achieved higher treatment success rates (≥50% pain relief) than did BMT (risk difference: 0.59, 95% CI: [0.33, 0.85], p < 0.00001). Moreover, SCS significantly improved the EuroQol-5 Dimension utility index (MD: 0.16, 95% CI: [0.10, 0.23], p < 0.00001) and self-reported health (MD: 15.29, 95% CI: [4.51, 26.07], p = 0.005).
Conclusion: This meta-analysis provides robust evidence supporting SCS as an effective intervention for managing chronic pain and enhancing the quality of life in patients with PDN, highlighting its superiority to conventional medical therapy.
期刊介绍:
Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface is the preeminent journal in the area of neuromodulation, providing our readership with the state of the art clinical, translational, and basic science research in the field. For clinicians, engineers, scientists and members of the biotechnology industry alike, Neuromodulation provides timely and rigorously peer-reviewed articles on the technology, science, and clinical application of devices that interface with the nervous system to treat disease and improve function.