Amanda V Gusovsky Chevalier, Julia L Agne, Laura J Rush, Justin Kullgren, Adria Lam, Maureen Saphire, Darian C Rostam, Gennaro Di Tosto, Ann Scheck McAlearney, Sachin S Kale
{"title":"接受阿片类药物治疗癌症疼痛患者的纵向尿液药物检测。","authors":"Amanda V Gusovsky Chevalier, Julia L Agne, Laura J Rush, Justin Kullgren, Adria Lam, Maureen Saphire, Darian C Rostam, Gennaro Di Tosto, Ann Scheck McAlearney, Sachin S Kale","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.02.473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>To assess for nonprescribed substance use and adherence to controlled medication treatment, urine drug tests (UDT) are recommended for patients receiving opioids for cancer-related pain management. However, the optimal frequency of UDTs during opioid treatment is unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe initial and subsequent UDT results among patients diagnosed with cancer receiving outpatient palliative care (PC) at a tertiary cancer center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single center retrospective study including adult (≥18 years old) patients who established with an outpatient PC clinic at The Ohio State University (OSU) James Cancer Hospital from July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2019. Outcomes examined were two types of unexplained UDT results: 1) time to first presence of nonprescribed substance; and 2) time to first absence of prescribed substance. Both outcomes were plotted as a reverse Kaplan-Meier survival curve. Substances implicated in unexplained UDT results were summarized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,141 patients and 2,459 UDTs were included. Mean patient age was 57 years, and the sample was 51% female and 83% White. Mean UDT per patient was 2.4 (SD = 2.1). 15.1% of patients had an unexplained UDT. Among patients with an unexplained UDT, 45% were detected at baseline UDT. At 24 months, probability of: nonprescribed substance was 19.7% (95% CI [15.4, 24.9]); absence of prescribed substance was 18.6% (95% CI [14.1%, 24.4%]). Cocaine was the most common (18.1%) nonprescribed substance, and oxycodone (52.7%) was the most common absent substance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Unexplained UDT results were captured at varying timepoints throughout PC engagement, supporting the use of baseline and subsequent UDTs to optimize patient safety in cancer symptom management. PC providers should consider continuing to use UDTs as a way to monitor medication adherence throughout PC engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Longitudinal Urine Drug Testing Among Patients Receiving Opioids for Cancer Pain.\",\"authors\":\"Amanda V Gusovsky Chevalier, Julia L Agne, Laura J Rush, Justin Kullgren, Adria Lam, Maureen Saphire, Darian C Rostam, Gennaro Di Tosto, Ann Scheck McAlearney, Sachin S Kale\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.02.473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>To assess for nonprescribed substance use and adherence to controlled medication treatment, urine drug tests (UDT) are recommended for patients receiving opioids for cancer-related pain management. However, the optimal frequency of UDTs during opioid treatment is unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe initial and subsequent UDT results among patients diagnosed with cancer receiving outpatient palliative care (PC) at a tertiary cancer center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single center retrospective study including adult (≥18 years old) patients who established with an outpatient PC clinic at The Ohio State University (OSU) James Cancer Hospital from July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2019. Outcomes examined were two types of unexplained UDT results: 1) time to first presence of nonprescribed substance; and 2) time to first absence of prescribed substance. Both outcomes were plotted as a reverse Kaplan-Meier survival curve. Substances implicated in unexplained UDT results were summarized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,141 patients and 2,459 UDTs were included. Mean patient age was 57 years, and the sample was 51% female and 83% White. Mean UDT per patient was 2.4 (SD = 2.1). 15.1% of patients had an unexplained UDT. Among patients with an unexplained UDT, 45% were detected at baseline UDT. At 24 months, probability of: nonprescribed substance was 19.7% (95% CI [15.4, 24.9]); absence of prescribed substance was 18.6% (95% CI [14.1%, 24.4%]). Cocaine was the most common (18.1%) nonprescribed substance, and oxycodone (52.7%) was the most common absent substance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Unexplained UDT results were captured at varying timepoints throughout PC engagement, supporting the use of baseline and subsequent UDTs to optimize patient safety in cancer symptom management. PC providers should consider continuing to use UDTs as a way to monitor medication adherence throughout PC engagement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pain and symptom management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pain and symptom management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.02.473\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.02.473","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:为了评估非处方药物的使用和对受控药物治疗的依从性,推荐对接受阿片类药物治疗癌症相关疼痛的患者进行尿检(UDT)。然而,阿片类药物治疗期间udt的最佳频率尚不清楚。目的:描述在三级癌症中心接受门诊姑息治疗(PC)的癌症诊断患者的初始和后续UDT结果。方法:一项单中心回顾性研究,纳入2017年7月1日至2019年6月30日在俄亥俄州立大学(OSU)詹姆斯癌症医院门诊PC诊所就诊的成人(≥18岁)患者。检查的结果是两种类型的不明原因的UDT结果:1)首次出现非处方物质的时间;2)第一次缺少处方物质的时间。两种结果均绘制为反向Kaplan-Meier生存曲线。总结了与无法解释的UDT结果有关的物质。结果:共纳入1141例患者和2459例udt。患者平均年龄为57岁,51%为女性,83%为白人。每位患者平均UDT为2.4 (SD=2.1)。15.1%的患者有不明原因的UDT。在不明原因的UDT患者中,45%在基线UDT时被检测到。在24个月时,非处方物质的概率为19.7% (95% CI (15.4, 24.9));处方物质缺乏率为18.6% (95% CI(14.1%, 24.4%))。非处方物质以可卡因(18.1%)最多,缺失物质以羟考酮(52.7%)最多。结论:在整个PC手术过程中,在不同的时间点捕获了不明原因的UDT结果,支持使用基线和随后的UDT来优化癌症症状管理中的患者安全性。PC供应商应该考虑继续使用udt作为一种监控整个PC用户服药依从性的方法。
Longitudinal Urine Drug Testing Among Patients Receiving Opioids for Cancer Pain.
Context: To assess for nonprescribed substance use and adherence to controlled medication treatment, urine drug tests (UDT) are recommended for patients receiving opioids for cancer-related pain management. However, the optimal frequency of UDTs during opioid treatment is unclear.
Objectives: To describe initial and subsequent UDT results among patients diagnosed with cancer receiving outpatient palliative care (PC) at a tertiary cancer center.
Methods: A single center retrospective study including adult (≥18 years old) patients who established with an outpatient PC clinic at The Ohio State University (OSU) James Cancer Hospital from July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2019. Outcomes examined were two types of unexplained UDT results: 1) time to first presence of nonprescribed substance; and 2) time to first absence of prescribed substance. Both outcomes were plotted as a reverse Kaplan-Meier survival curve. Substances implicated in unexplained UDT results were summarized.
Results: A total of 1,141 patients and 2,459 UDTs were included. Mean patient age was 57 years, and the sample was 51% female and 83% White. Mean UDT per patient was 2.4 (SD = 2.1). 15.1% of patients had an unexplained UDT. Among patients with an unexplained UDT, 45% were detected at baseline UDT. At 24 months, probability of: nonprescribed substance was 19.7% (95% CI [15.4, 24.9]); absence of prescribed substance was 18.6% (95% CI [14.1%, 24.4%]). Cocaine was the most common (18.1%) nonprescribed substance, and oxycodone (52.7%) was the most common absent substance.
Conclusion: Unexplained UDT results were captured at varying timepoints throughout PC engagement, supporting the use of baseline and subsequent UDTs to optimize patient safety in cancer symptom management. PC providers should consider continuing to use UDTs as a way to monitor medication adherence throughout PC engagement.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.