初级保健中提供的性取向和性别认同确认活动。

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ellesse-Roselee L Akre, Ching-Wen Wendy Yang, Greta R Bauer, Matthew Brian Mackwood, A James O'Malley, Elliott S Fisher, Karen E Schifferdecker
{"title":"初级保健中提供的性取向和性别认同确认活动。","authors":"Ellesse-Roselee L Akre, Ching-Wen Wendy Yang, Greta R Bauer, Matthew Brian Mackwood, A James O'Malley, Elliott S Fisher, Karen E Schifferdecker","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Addressing health disparities in lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) communities has been a significant policy focus for more than a decade. Ensuring access to safe, respectful primary health care from knowledgeable clinicians is crucial for reducing health inequalities.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the engagement of primary care practices in LGBTQ+ affirming care activities and identify practice characteristics associated with increased engagement.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cross-sectional study used data from the National Survey of Healthcare Organizations and Systems II, which focused on primary care practices in the US and was administered between June 2022 through February 2023. Participants were primary care physicians and practice managers. Percentages were weighted for national representation. Data were analyzed from November 2023 to December 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Practice characteristics including practice size, ownership, federally qualified health center (FQHC) designation; percentage of patients enrolled in Medicare; percentage of patients enrolled in Medicaid; having accountable care organization (ACO) contracts for Medicare, Medicaid, or commercial insurance; rurality; census region; and LGBTQ+ Equality Score by state policy.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Sexual orientation- and gender identity- (SOGI) affirming activities, a composite variable reflecting activity specific to SOGI patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1245 practices in the sample (38.4% response rate), 923 (77.40%) collected data on gender identity, 921 (75.62%) on sexual orientation, and 742 (65.83%) on patients' pronouns. Only 412 practices (34.42%) provided LGBTQ+ training for clinicians and 480 practices (39.20%) provided training for staff. Practices designated as FQHCs had 3.16 (95% CI, 4.60 to 19.73) percentage points higher probability of engaging in all SOGI-affirming activities) compared with non-FQHCs (P = .001). Practices with a Medicaid payer mix at least 50% had 3.28 (95% CI, 1.19 to 5.36) percentage points higher probability than practices with less than 50% Medicaid payer mix (P = .002), and participation in a Medicaid ACO was associated with 4.26 (95% CI, 0.78 to 7.73) percentage points increased probability compared with nonparticipants (P = .02). Each 1-unit increase in the state-level LGBTQ+ Equality Score was associated with 1.07 (95% CI, 0.28 to 1.85) percentage points higher probability of engaging in all SOGI-affirming activities (P = .02). High performance was negatively associated with practice rurality (average marginal effect, -16.00 [95% CI, -29.72 to -2.28]; P = .02), and rural practices were less likely to provide appropriate referrals (average marginal effect, -15.47 [95% CI, -29.22 to -1.72]; P = .03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>These findings suggest there is a need for federal and state mandates to require LGBTQ+ health care and competency training for health professionals and standardized data collection on SOGI, and these may be particularly important in rural regions. These measures are essential to evaluate practice performance and address health disparities effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 3","pages":"e250392"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11894487/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sexual Orientation- and Gender Identity-Affirming Activities Provided in Primary Care.\",\"authors\":\"Ellesse-Roselee L Akre, Ching-Wen Wendy Yang, Greta R Bauer, Matthew Brian Mackwood, A James O'Malley, Elliott S Fisher, Karen E Schifferdecker\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Addressing health disparities in lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) communities has been a significant policy focus for more than a decade. Ensuring access to safe, respectful primary health care from knowledgeable clinicians is crucial for reducing health inequalities.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the engagement of primary care practices in LGBTQ+ affirming care activities and identify practice characteristics associated with increased engagement.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cross-sectional study used data from the National Survey of Healthcare Organizations and Systems II, which focused on primary care practices in the US and was administered between June 2022 through February 2023. Participants were primary care physicians and practice managers. Percentages were weighted for national representation. Data were analyzed from November 2023 to December 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Practice characteristics including practice size, ownership, federally qualified health center (FQHC) designation; percentage of patients enrolled in Medicare; percentage of patients enrolled in Medicaid; having accountable care organization (ACO) contracts for Medicare, Medicaid, or commercial insurance; rurality; census region; and LGBTQ+ Equality Score by state policy.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Sexual orientation- and gender identity- (SOGI) affirming activities, a composite variable reflecting activity specific to SOGI patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1245 practices in the sample (38.4% response rate), 923 (77.40%) collected data on gender identity, 921 (75.62%) on sexual orientation, and 742 (65.83%) on patients' pronouns. Only 412 practices (34.42%) provided LGBTQ+ training for clinicians and 480 practices (39.20%) provided training for staff. Practices designated as FQHCs had 3.16 (95% CI, 4.60 to 19.73) percentage points higher probability of engaging in all SOGI-affirming activities) compared with non-FQHCs (P = .001). Practices with a Medicaid payer mix at least 50% had 3.28 (95% CI, 1.19 to 5.36) percentage points higher probability than practices with less than 50% Medicaid payer mix (P = .002), and participation in a Medicaid ACO was associated with 4.26 (95% CI, 0.78 to 7.73) percentage points increased probability compared with nonparticipants (P = .02). Each 1-unit increase in the state-level LGBTQ+ Equality Score was associated with 1.07 (95% CI, 0.28 to 1.85) percentage points higher probability of engaging in all SOGI-affirming activities (P = .02). High performance was negatively associated with practice rurality (average marginal effect, -16.00 [95% CI, -29.72 to -2.28]; P = .02), and rural practices were less likely to provide appropriate referrals (average marginal effect, -15.47 [95% CI, -29.22 to -1.72]; P = .03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>These findings suggest there is a need for federal and state mandates to require LGBTQ+ health care and competency training for health professionals and standardized data collection on SOGI, and these may be particularly important in rural regions. These measures are essential to evaluate practice performance and address health disparities effectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Network Open\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"e250392\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11894487/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Network Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0392\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0392","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:十多年来,解决女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人和酷儿(LGBTQ+)群体的健康差异一直是一个重要的政策重点。确保从知识渊博的临床医生那里获得安全、受尊重的初级卫生保健,对于减少卫生不平等至关重要。目的:评估初级保健实践在LGBTQ+肯定护理活动中的参与度,并确定与参与度增加相关的实践特征。设计、环境和参与者:本横断面研究使用了来自全国医疗保健组织和系统调查II的数据,该调查侧重于美国的初级保健实践,研究时间为2022年6月至2023年2月。参与者是初级保健医生和实践经理。根据国家代表性对百分比进行加权。数据分析时间为2023年11月至2024年12月。暴露:实践特征,包括实践规模,所有权,联邦合格卫生中心(FQHC)指定;参加医疗保险的患者百分比;参加医疗补助计划的患者比例;拥有医疗保险、医疗补助或商业保险的责任医疗组织(ACO)合同;田园风光;人口普查;以及LGBTQ+平等得分。主要结果和测量:性取向和性别认同(SOGI)确认活动,一个反映SOGI患者特异性活动的复合变量。结果:1245家诊所中,923家(77.40%)收集了性别认同数据,921家(75.62%)收集了性取向数据,742家(65.83%)收集了患者代词数据。仅有412家诊所(34.42%)为临床医生提供LGBTQ+培训,480家诊所(39.20%)为员工提供培训。指定为fqhc的实践与非fqhc相比,参与所有sogi确认活动的概率高3.16 (95% CI, 4.60至19.73)个百分点(P = .001)。医疗补助支付者组合至少50%的实践比医疗补助支付者组合少于50%的实践的概率高3.28 (95% CI, 1.19至5.36)个百分点(P = .002),参与医疗补助ACO的概率比未参与的增加4.26 (95% CI, 0.78至7.73)个百分点(P = .02)。国家级LGBTQ+平等得分每增加1个单位,参与所有sogi肯定活动的可能性就会增加1.07个百分点(95% CI, 0.28至1.85)(P = 0.02)。高绩效与实践乡村性呈负相关(平均边际效应,-16.00 [95% CI, -29.72至-2.28];P = .02),农村实践不太可能提供适当的转诊(平均边际效应,-15.47 [95% CI, -29.22至-1.72];p = .03)。结论和相关性:这些发现表明,联邦和州有必要对卫生专业人员进行LGBTQ+卫生保健和能力培训,并对SOGI数据进行标准化收集,这些在农村地区可能尤其重要。这些措施对于评估实践绩效和有效解决健康差异至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sexual Orientation- and Gender Identity-Affirming Activities Provided in Primary Care.

Importance: Addressing health disparities in lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) communities has been a significant policy focus for more than a decade. Ensuring access to safe, respectful primary health care from knowledgeable clinicians is crucial for reducing health inequalities.

Objective: To assess the engagement of primary care practices in LGBTQ+ affirming care activities and identify practice characteristics associated with increased engagement.

Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional study used data from the National Survey of Healthcare Organizations and Systems II, which focused on primary care practices in the US and was administered between June 2022 through February 2023. Participants were primary care physicians and practice managers. Percentages were weighted for national representation. Data were analyzed from November 2023 to December 2024.

Exposure: Practice characteristics including practice size, ownership, federally qualified health center (FQHC) designation; percentage of patients enrolled in Medicare; percentage of patients enrolled in Medicaid; having accountable care organization (ACO) contracts for Medicare, Medicaid, or commercial insurance; rurality; census region; and LGBTQ+ Equality Score by state policy.

Main outcomes and measures: Sexual orientation- and gender identity- (SOGI) affirming activities, a composite variable reflecting activity specific to SOGI patients.

Results: Among 1245 practices in the sample (38.4% response rate), 923 (77.40%) collected data on gender identity, 921 (75.62%) on sexual orientation, and 742 (65.83%) on patients' pronouns. Only 412 practices (34.42%) provided LGBTQ+ training for clinicians and 480 practices (39.20%) provided training for staff. Practices designated as FQHCs had 3.16 (95% CI, 4.60 to 19.73) percentage points higher probability of engaging in all SOGI-affirming activities) compared with non-FQHCs (P = .001). Practices with a Medicaid payer mix at least 50% had 3.28 (95% CI, 1.19 to 5.36) percentage points higher probability than practices with less than 50% Medicaid payer mix (P = .002), and participation in a Medicaid ACO was associated with 4.26 (95% CI, 0.78 to 7.73) percentage points increased probability compared with nonparticipants (P = .02). Each 1-unit increase in the state-level LGBTQ+ Equality Score was associated with 1.07 (95% CI, 0.28 to 1.85) percentage points higher probability of engaging in all SOGI-affirming activities (P = .02). High performance was negatively associated with practice rurality (average marginal effect, -16.00 [95% CI, -29.72 to -2.28]; P = .02), and rural practices were less likely to provide appropriate referrals (average marginal effect, -15.47 [95% CI, -29.22 to -1.72]; P = .03).

Conclusions and relevance: These findings suggest there is a need for federal and state mandates to require LGBTQ+ health care and competency training for health professionals and standardized data collection on SOGI, and these may be particularly important in rural regions. These measures are essential to evaluate practice performance and address health disparities effectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信