IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Fadi Samaan , Elizabeth Lavanga , Leana Dogbe , Ahsan Zil-E-Ali , Faisal Aziz
{"title":"Preoperative History of Gabapentinoids Use is Associated with Longer Length of Hospital Stay in Patients Undergoing Lower Extremity Bypass Surgery for Severe Peripheral Artery Disease","authors":"Fadi Samaan ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Lavanga ,&nbsp;Leana Dogbe ,&nbsp;Ahsan Zil-E-Ali ,&nbsp;Faisal Aziz","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.02.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study aimed to assess the association of preoperative gabapentinoids (GBP) use with the postoperative length of stay for patients undergoing peripheral artery lower extremity bypass (LEB) surgery for lifestyle-limiting claudication and chronic limb-threatening ischemia at a tertiary care hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients undergoing LEB surgery during the period between 2000 and 2020 at Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center were stratified into 2 groups based on the preoperative use of prescribed GBPs (GBPs versus no GBPs). Patients' preoperative characteristics, comorbidities and medications were assessed, and the outcomes of interest were analyzed in univariate analysis, stratified analysis, and by multivariable regression models. Primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and length of stay. The secondary outcomes included readmissions, unplanned return to the operating room, amputation, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, urinary tract infections, wound complications, acute congestive heart failure exacerbation and nonhome discharge. A <em>P</em> value of &lt;0.05 was considered significant for all the analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study cohort comprised 359 patients. The GBPs group comprised 125 patients with a mean (standard deviation) age of 61.6 (±10.2) years and the no-GBPs group consisted of 234 patients with a mean (standard deviation) age of 64.6 (±12.2) years. Patients in GBPs group were likely to be younger (<em>P</em> = 0.014), undergo LEB for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (<em>P</em> = 0.039), and have insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) than the no-GBPs group. In terms of outcomes, the patients in the GBPs group were more likely to have longer postoperative length of stay (9.3 ± 11.1 vs. 6.4 ± 5.0 days no GBPs, <em>P</em> = 0.008). In multivariable analysis, the patients in the GBPs group had 92% (adjusted odds ratio 1.92 [1.16, 3.18], <em>P</em> = 0.01) increase in the odds of having a length of stay above 6-day calculated median in comparison to the no-GBPs group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This retrospective analysis of patients undergoing LEB at a tertiary care hospital shows a significant association between preoperative GBPs use and the longer postoperative length of stay. This study bridges a gap in the current body of knowledge regarding the association of GBP use with the postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing LEB for severe peripheral artery disease.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":"114 ","pages":"Pages 251-259"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890509625001128","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在评估一家三甲医院中因生活方式限制性跛行和慢性肢体缺血(CLTI)而接受外周动脉下肢搭桥手术(LEB)的患者术前使用加巴喷丁类药物(GBP)与术后住院时间的关系:宾夕法尼亚州立健康 Milton S. Hershey 医疗中心在 2010 年至 2020 年期间接受下肢搭桥手术的患者根据术前使用处方加巴喷丁类药物(GBPs vs No GBPs)的情况分为两组。对患者的术前特征、合并症和用药情况进行了评估,并通过单变量分析、分层分析和多变量回归模型对相关结果进行了分析。主要结果是 30 天死亡率和住院时间。次要结果包括再入院、意外返回手术室、截肢、心肌梗死、脑血管意外、肺炎、肺栓塞、尿路感染、伤口并发症、急性充血性心力衰竭加重和非居家出院。研究结果的 p 值为研究对象包括 359 名患者。GBPs组有125名患者,平均(标清)年龄为61.6(±10.2)岁;无GBPs组有234名患者,平均(标清)年龄为64.6(±12.2)岁。GBPs组患者可能更年轻(p=0.014)、因CLTI接受LEB治疗(p=0.039)和患有胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(pConclusion):这项对在一家三级医院接受 LEB 治疗的患者进行的回顾性分析表明,术前使用加巴喷丁类药物与术后住院时间延长之间存在显著关联。这项研究填补了目前关于重度 PAD LEB 患者使用 GBP 与术后结果之间关系的知识空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preoperative History of Gabapentinoids Use is Associated with Longer Length of Hospital Stay in Patients Undergoing Lower Extremity Bypass Surgery for Severe Peripheral Artery Disease

Background

This study aimed to assess the association of preoperative gabapentinoids (GBP) use with the postoperative length of stay for patients undergoing peripheral artery lower extremity bypass (LEB) surgery for lifestyle-limiting claudication and chronic limb-threatening ischemia at a tertiary care hospital.

Methods

Patients undergoing LEB surgery during the period between 2000 and 2020 at Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center were stratified into 2 groups based on the preoperative use of prescribed GBPs (GBPs versus no GBPs). Patients' preoperative characteristics, comorbidities and medications were assessed, and the outcomes of interest were analyzed in univariate analysis, stratified analysis, and by multivariable regression models. Primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and length of stay. The secondary outcomes included readmissions, unplanned return to the operating room, amputation, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, urinary tract infections, wound complications, acute congestive heart failure exacerbation and nonhome discharge. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant for all the analyses.

Results

The study cohort comprised 359 patients. The GBPs group comprised 125 patients with a mean (standard deviation) age of 61.6 (±10.2) years and the no-GBPs group consisted of 234 patients with a mean (standard deviation) age of 64.6 (±12.2) years. Patients in GBPs group were likely to be younger (P = 0.014), undergo LEB for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (P = 0.039), and have insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (P < 0.001) than the no-GBPs group. In terms of outcomes, the patients in the GBPs group were more likely to have longer postoperative length of stay (9.3 ± 11.1 vs. 6.4 ± 5.0 days no GBPs, P = 0.008). In multivariable analysis, the patients in the GBPs group had 92% (adjusted odds ratio 1.92 [1.16, 3.18], P = 0.01) increase in the odds of having a length of stay above 6-day calculated median in comparison to the no-GBPs group.

Conclusion

This retrospective analysis of patients undergoing LEB at a tertiary care hospital shows a significant association between preoperative GBPs use and the longer postoperative length of stay. This study bridges a gap in the current body of knowledge regarding the association of GBP use with the postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing LEB for severe peripheral artery disease.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
603
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal: Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials) Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work) Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients) General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic) Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers) Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery) Editorials/Correspondence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信