血管内修复髂动脉瘤的戈尔髂分支内假体与上翻技术。

IF 0.6 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Annals of vascular diseases Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-04 DOI:10.3400/avd.oa.24-00114
Takuya Shimizu, Miho Kamakura, Yoshihisa Murata, Kazuhiro Ota, Miki Takeda, Wakiko Hiranuma, Takayuki Matsuoka, Tadanori Minagawa, Shunsuke Kawamoto
{"title":"血管内修复髂动脉瘤的戈尔髂分支内假体与上翻技术。","authors":"Takuya Shimizu, Miho Kamakura, Yoshihisa Murata, Kazuhiro Ota, Miki Takeda, Wakiko Hiranuma, Takayuki Matsuoka, Tadanori Minagawa, Shunsuke Kawamoto","doi":"10.3400/avd.oa.24-00114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> The Gore iliac branch endoprosthesis (IBE) enables internal iliac artery (IIA) reconstruction, extending the indications of endovascular aneurysmal repair (EVAR); however, the up-and-over technique is challenging. This study aimed to clarify the advantages and procedural limitations of the up-and-over technique. <b>Methods:</b> From January 2019 to October 2022, 22 patients who underwent IIA reconstruction with Gore IBE were enrolled. The patients were divided into the S and Up groups that underwent IIA reconstruction using the standard and up-and-over techniques, respectively. Aortic anatomic measurements, surgical factors, and postoperative outcomes were examined. <b>Results:</b> No significant differences in operative time, fluoroscopy time, contrast medium use, blood loss volume, and length of postoperative hospital stay were observed between the S (12 patients) and Up (10 patients) groups. However, the distance from the lower renal artery to the reconstructed IIA origin was considerably shorter in the Up group than in the S group. During the 19-month follow-up, no adverse events were observed in the Up group. <b>Conclusions:</b> The up-and-over technique can be a valuable option for cases where IIA reconstruction is difficult with standard procedures with Gore IBE. Therefore, understanding the procedural precautions and ensuring safety are crucial to its success.</p>","PeriodicalId":7995,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular diseases","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11885932/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endovascular Repair of Iliac Aneurysms Using the Gore Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis with Up-and-Over Technique.\",\"authors\":\"Takuya Shimizu, Miho Kamakura, Yoshihisa Murata, Kazuhiro Ota, Miki Takeda, Wakiko Hiranuma, Takayuki Matsuoka, Tadanori Minagawa, Shunsuke Kawamoto\",\"doi\":\"10.3400/avd.oa.24-00114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> The Gore iliac branch endoprosthesis (IBE) enables internal iliac artery (IIA) reconstruction, extending the indications of endovascular aneurysmal repair (EVAR); however, the up-and-over technique is challenging. This study aimed to clarify the advantages and procedural limitations of the up-and-over technique. <b>Methods:</b> From January 2019 to October 2022, 22 patients who underwent IIA reconstruction with Gore IBE were enrolled. The patients were divided into the S and Up groups that underwent IIA reconstruction using the standard and up-and-over techniques, respectively. Aortic anatomic measurements, surgical factors, and postoperative outcomes were examined. <b>Results:</b> No significant differences in operative time, fluoroscopy time, contrast medium use, blood loss volume, and length of postoperative hospital stay were observed between the S (12 patients) and Up (10 patients) groups. However, the distance from the lower renal artery to the reconstructed IIA origin was considerably shorter in the Up group than in the S group. During the 19-month follow-up, no adverse events were observed in the Up group. <b>Conclusions:</b> The up-and-over technique can be a valuable option for cases where IIA reconstruction is difficult with standard procedures with Gore IBE. Therefore, understanding the procedural precautions and ensuring safety are crucial to its success.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of vascular diseases\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11885932/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of vascular diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.24-00114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.24-00114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:Gore髂分支内假体(IBE)能够重建髂内动脉(IIA),扩大血管内动脉瘤修复(EVAR)的适应症;然而,向上和向下的技术是具有挑战性的。本研究旨在阐明上翻技术的优点和程序限制。方法:2019年1月至2022年10月,纳入22例使用Gore IBE进行IIA重建的患者。将患者分为S组和Up组,分别采用标准和上翻技术进行IIA重建。检查主动脉解剖测量、手术因素和术后结果。结果:S组(12例)与Up组(10例)在手术时间、透视时间、造影剂使用、出血量、术后住院时间等方面均无显著差异。然而,Up组肾下动脉到重建IIA起始点的距离明显短于S组。在19个月的随访中,Up组无不良事件发生。结论:对于使用Gore IBE的标准程序难以重建IIA的病例,向上翻转技术是一种有价值的选择。因此,了解程序预防措施和确保安全是其成功的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Endovascular Repair of Iliac Aneurysms Using the Gore Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis with Up-and-Over Technique.

Objectives: The Gore iliac branch endoprosthesis (IBE) enables internal iliac artery (IIA) reconstruction, extending the indications of endovascular aneurysmal repair (EVAR); however, the up-and-over technique is challenging. This study aimed to clarify the advantages and procedural limitations of the up-and-over technique. Methods: From January 2019 to October 2022, 22 patients who underwent IIA reconstruction with Gore IBE were enrolled. The patients were divided into the S and Up groups that underwent IIA reconstruction using the standard and up-and-over techniques, respectively. Aortic anatomic measurements, surgical factors, and postoperative outcomes were examined. Results: No significant differences in operative time, fluoroscopy time, contrast medium use, blood loss volume, and length of postoperative hospital stay were observed between the S (12 patients) and Up (10 patients) groups. However, the distance from the lower renal artery to the reconstructed IIA origin was considerably shorter in the Up group than in the S group. During the 19-month follow-up, no adverse events were observed in the Up group. Conclusions: The up-and-over technique can be a valuable option for cases where IIA reconstruction is difficult with standard procedures with Gore IBE. Therefore, understanding the procedural precautions and ensuring safety are crucial to its success.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of vascular diseases
Annals of vascular diseases PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信