{"title":"Insights on DAPT Abbreviation and De-escalation from ULTIMATE-DAPT and Related Trials: Are we Heading Toward an Aspirin-Free Strategy?","authors":"Harshit Khare, Satyendra Tewari, Roopali Khanna, Aditya Kapoor","doi":"10.1007/s40256-025-00725-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The results of the recently concluded ULTIMATE-DAPT and T-PASS trials strongly support the emerging concept of antiplatelet monotherapy in patients at high bleeding risk undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Monotherapy with more potent antiplatelets such as ticagrelor is both a safe and an equally effective strategy to circumvent major bleeding episodes in patients at high bleeding risk while guarding against ischemic events. Although these results were not replicated with low-dose prasugrel monotherapy in the STOP-DAPT-3 trial, the other major trials investigating ticagrelor monotherapy (GLOBAL-LEADERS and TWILIGHT-ACS) suggested the feasibility and appropriateness of abbreviating the dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) as early as 1-3 months of the index procedure. Moreover, the recent data from TICO, T-PASS, and now the ULTIMATE-DAPT trial, hint toward early switchover to ticagrelor monotherapy without any undue concern of increased ischemic events. However, on closer examination, we find that study cohorts in most trials had lower anatomical complexity of coronary lesions and most adopted imaging-based revascularization strategies. Among these trials, those that achieved convincing levels of safety in ischemic endpoints mainly administered ticagrelor monotherapy. Can monotherapy with these newer antiplatelets sufficiently obviate the need for year-long DAPT? Can such antiplatelet monotherapy remain effective in all coronary artery disease subsets? Can we start patients solely on a single antiplatelet from day one of the procedure? These are some of the questions we attempt to answer by revisiting the results from these trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":7652,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40256-025-00725-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Insights on DAPT Abbreviation and De-escalation from ULTIMATE-DAPT and Related Trials: Are we Heading Toward an Aspirin-Free Strategy?
The results of the recently concluded ULTIMATE-DAPT and T-PASS trials strongly support the emerging concept of antiplatelet monotherapy in patients at high bleeding risk undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Monotherapy with more potent antiplatelets such as ticagrelor is both a safe and an equally effective strategy to circumvent major bleeding episodes in patients at high bleeding risk while guarding against ischemic events. Although these results were not replicated with low-dose prasugrel monotherapy in the STOP-DAPT-3 trial, the other major trials investigating ticagrelor monotherapy (GLOBAL-LEADERS and TWILIGHT-ACS) suggested the feasibility and appropriateness of abbreviating the dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) as early as 1-3 months of the index procedure. Moreover, the recent data from TICO, T-PASS, and now the ULTIMATE-DAPT trial, hint toward early switchover to ticagrelor monotherapy without any undue concern of increased ischemic events. However, on closer examination, we find that study cohorts in most trials had lower anatomical complexity of coronary lesions and most adopted imaging-based revascularization strategies. Among these trials, those that achieved convincing levels of safety in ischemic endpoints mainly administered ticagrelor monotherapy. Can monotherapy with these newer antiplatelets sufficiently obviate the need for year-long DAPT? Can such antiplatelet monotherapy remain effective in all coronary artery disease subsets? Can we start patients solely on a single antiplatelet from day one of the procedure? These are some of the questions we attempt to answer by revisiting the results from these trials.
期刊介绍:
Promoting rational therapy within the discipline of cardiology, the American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs covers all aspects of the treatment of cardiovascular disorders, particularly the place in therapy of newer and established agents.
Via a program of reviews and original clinical research articles, the journal addresses major issues relating to treatment of these disorders, including the pharmacology, efficacy and adverse effects of the major classes of drugs; information on newly developed drugs and drug classes; the therapeutic implications of latest research into the aetiology of cardiovascular disorders; and the practical management of specific clinical situations.
The American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs offers a range of additional enhanced features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist patients, caregivers and others in understanding important medical advances. The journal also provides the option to include various other types of enhanced features including slide sets, videos and animations. All enhanced features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. Peer review is conducted using Editorial Manager®, supported by a database of international experts. This database is shared with other Adis journals.