加强对痴呆人群HRQoL的经济评价

IF 4.9 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Hannah Hussain, Anju Keetharuth, Allan Wailoo, Donna Rowen
{"title":"加强对痴呆人群HRQoL的经济评价","authors":"Hannah Hussain,&nbsp;Anju Keetharuth,&nbsp;Allan Wailoo,&nbsp;Donna Rowen","doi":"10.1002/trc2.70061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\n \n <p>This study aims to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and validity of EQ-5D instrument administration methods and proxy selection for evaluating health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in dementia populations. EQ-5D is a widely used measure of HRQoL and is recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence for cost-effectiveness analyses of health interventions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> METHODS</h3>\n \n <p>Individual-level data from three trials were analyzed separately to evaluate missing data rates, inter-rater agreement, responsiveness, and predictors of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L) dimensions and index values. The study used psychometric analyses, correlations, and multivariate linear regression models to evaluate EQ-5D dimension reports. Reports from both people with dementia (PwD) and proxies were compared to assess reliability across different settings and proxy types.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> RESULTS</h3>\n \n <p>Proxy-reported EQ-5D achieved higher completion rates compared to reports from PwD, with proxies showing greater responsiveness to changes in symptom scores over time. Face-to-face instrument administration for informal proxies was favored over postal methods, and proxy selection was found to be crucial, with informal proxies recommended for community-dwelling PwD and staff proxies for institutionalized populations. Inter-rater agreement was strongest for the “mobility” dimension, with differences in reporting by dimension. Novel guidelines on integrating EQ-5D data reported by PwD and proxies are proposed. Combining self- and proxy-reported data to generate an integrated utility score potentially reflects a more holistic perspective and may enhance the accuracy of HRQoL assessment, compared to relying solely on one respondent's reports.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\n \n <p>The importance of careful administration and proxy selection for HRQoL data collection and application in dementia trials and studies is highlighted. These findings have implications for informing economic evaluations of dementia interventions, emphasizing the potential need for tailoring approaches to HRQoL assessment based on the residential status of the PwD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>The EQ-5D is a widely used measure in dementia trials, but challenges like missing data and discrepancies in inter-rater agreement highlight complexities in assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL), especially in advanced stages.</li>\n \n <li>This study empirically examines the feasibility, acceptability, and validity of EQ-5D data from people with dementia and proxies, using individual-level data from three trials.</li>\n \n <li>Recommendations are provided to improve data collection practices, enhancing the reliability of HRQoL assessments in clinical trials for dementia interventions.</li>\n \n <li>Optimized proxy selection criteria and administration methods tailored to residential status can improve HRQoL assessments, supporting more accurate economic evaluations and better-informed care decisions.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":53225,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/trc2.70061","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing HRQoL assessment for economic evaluation in dementia populations\",\"authors\":\"Hannah Hussain,&nbsp;Anju Keetharuth,&nbsp;Allan Wailoo,&nbsp;Donna Rowen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/trc2.70061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aims to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and validity of EQ-5D instrument administration methods and proxy selection for evaluating health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in dementia populations. EQ-5D is a widely used measure of HRQoL and is recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence for cost-effectiveness analyses of health interventions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> METHODS</h3>\\n \\n <p>Individual-level data from three trials were analyzed separately to evaluate missing data rates, inter-rater agreement, responsiveness, and predictors of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L) dimensions and index values. The study used psychometric analyses, correlations, and multivariate linear regression models to evaluate EQ-5D dimension reports. Reports from both people with dementia (PwD) and proxies were compared to assess reliability across different settings and proxy types.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> RESULTS</h3>\\n \\n <p>Proxy-reported EQ-5D achieved higher completion rates compared to reports from PwD, with proxies showing greater responsiveness to changes in symptom scores over time. Face-to-face instrument administration for informal proxies was favored over postal methods, and proxy selection was found to be crucial, with informal proxies recommended for community-dwelling PwD and staff proxies for institutionalized populations. Inter-rater agreement was strongest for the “mobility” dimension, with differences in reporting by dimension. Novel guidelines on integrating EQ-5D data reported by PwD and proxies are proposed. Combining self- and proxy-reported data to generate an integrated utility score potentially reflects a more holistic perspective and may enhance the accuracy of HRQoL assessment, compared to relying solely on one respondent's reports.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\\n \\n <p>The importance of careful administration and proxy selection for HRQoL data collection and application in dementia trials and studies is highlighted. These findings have implications for informing economic evaluations of dementia interventions, emphasizing the potential need for tailoring approaches to HRQoL assessment based on the residential status of the PwD.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Highlights</h3>\\n \\n <div>\\n <ul>\\n \\n <li>The EQ-5D is a widely used measure in dementia trials, but challenges like missing data and discrepancies in inter-rater agreement highlight complexities in assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL), especially in advanced stages.</li>\\n \\n <li>This study empirically examines the feasibility, acceptability, and validity of EQ-5D data from people with dementia and proxies, using individual-level data from three trials.</li>\\n \\n <li>Recommendations are provided to improve data collection practices, enhancing the reliability of HRQoL assessments in clinical trials for dementia interventions.</li>\\n \\n <li>Optimized proxy selection criteria and administration methods tailored to residential status can improve HRQoL assessments, supporting more accurate economic evaluations and better-informed care decisions.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/trc2.70061\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/trc2.70061\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/trc2.70061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估EQ-5D仪器给药方法和代理选择评估痴呆人群健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的可行性、可接受性和有效性。EQ-5D是一种广泛使用的HRQoL测量方法,并被国家卫生和保健卓越研究所推荐用于卫生干预措施的成本效益分析。方法分别分析三个试验的个体水平数据,评估EQ-5D (EQ-5D- 3l和EQ-5D- 5l)维度和指数值的数据缺失率、评分间一致性、响应性和预测因素。本研究使用心理测量分析、相关性和多元线性回归模型来评估EQ-5D维度报告。比较了痴呆症患者(PwD)和代理的报告,评估了不同设置和代理类型的可靠性。结果:与PwD报告相比,代理报告的EQ-5D获得了更高的完成率,代理对症状评分随时间变化的反应性更强。非正式代理的面对面文书管理比邮寄方式更受欢迎,代理选择至关重要,建议非正式代理用于社区居住的残疾人,工作人员代理用于机构人口。评分者之间的一致性在“流动性”维度上是最强的,不同维度的报告存在差异。提出了整合由PwD和代理报告的EQ-5D数据的新指南。将自我报告和代理报告的数据结合起来,生成综合效用评分,可能反映出更全面的观点,与仅仅依赖一个被调查者的报告相比,可能提高HRQoL评估的准确性。强调了在痴呆症试验和研究中HRQoL数据收集和应用中谨慎管理和代理选择的重要性。这些发现对痴呆干预的经济评估具有启示意义,强调了基于残疾人士居住状况定制HRQoL评估方法的潜在需求。EQ-5D是痴呆症试验中广泛使用的一种测量方法,但数据缺失和评分者之间的差异等挑战突出了评估健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的复杂性,特别是在晚期。本研究利用三个试验的个体水平数据,实证检验了痴呆症患者和代理的EQ-5D数据的可行性、可接受性和有效性。提出了改进数据收集实践的建议,提高痴呆干预临床试验中HRQoL评估的可靠性。优化代理选择标准和针对居住状况量身定制的管理方法可以改善HRQoL评估,支持更准确的经济评估和更明智的护理决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing HRQoL assessment for economic evaluation in dementia populations

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and validity of EQ-5D instrument administration methods and proxy selection for evaluating health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in dementia populations. EQ-5D is a widely used measure of HRQoL and is recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence for cost-effectiveness analyses of health interventions.

METHODS

Individual-level data from three trials were analyzed separately to evaluate missing data rates, inter-rater agreement, responsiveness, and predictors of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L) dimensions and index values. The study used psychometric analyses, correlations, and multivariate linear regression models to evaluate EQ-5D dimension reports. Reports from both people with dementia (PwD) and proxies were compared to assess reliability across different settings and proxy types.

RESULTS

Proxy-reported EQ-5D achieved higher completion rates compared to reports from PwD, with proxies showing greater responsiveness to changes in symptom scores over time. Face-to-face instrument administration for informal proxies was favored over postal methods, and proxy selection was found to be crucial, with informal proxies recommended for community-dwelling PwD and staff proxies for institutionalized populations. Inter-rater agreement was strongest for the “mobility” dimension, with differences in reporting by dimension. Novel guidelines on integrating EQ-5D data reported by PwD and proxies are proposed. Combining self- and proxy-reported data to generate an integrated utility score potentially reflects a more holistic perspective and may enhance the accuracy of HRQoL assessment, compared to relying solely on one respondent's reports.

DISCUSSION

The importance of careful administration and proxy selection for HRQoL data collection and application in dementia trials and studies is highlighted. These findings have implications for informing economic evaluations of dementia interventions, emphasizing the potential need for tailoring approaches to HRQoL assessment based on the residential status of the PwD.

Highlights

  • The EQ-5D is a widely used measure in dementia trials, but challenges like missing data and discrepancies in inter-rater agreement highlight complexities in assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL), especially in advanced stages.
  • This study empirically examines the feasibility, acceptability, and validity of EQ-5D data from people with dementia and proxies, using individual-level data from three trials.
  • Recommendations are provided to improve data collection practices, enhancing the reliability of HRQoL assessments in clinical trials for dementia interventions.
  • Optimized proxy selection criteria and administration methods tailored to residential status can improve HRQoL assessments, supporting more accurate economic evaluations and better-informed care decisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
2.10%
发文量
134
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer''s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions (TRCI) is a peer-reviewed, open access,journal from the Alzheimer''s Association®. The journal seeks to bridge the full scope of explorations between basic research on drug discovery and clinical studies, validating putative therapies for aging-related chronic brain conditions that affect cognition, motor functions, and other behavioral or clinical symptoms associated with all forms dementia and Alzheimer''s disease. The journal will publish findings from diverse domains of research and disciplines to accelerate the conversion of abstract facts into practical knowledge: specifically, to translate what is learned at the bench into bedside applications. The journal seeks to publish articles that go beyond a singular emphasis on either basic drug discovery research or clinical research. Rather, an important theme of articles will be the linkages between and among the various discrete steps in the complex continuum of therapy development. For rapid communication among a multidisciplinary research audience involving the range of therapeutic interventions, TRCI will consider only original contributions that include feature length research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, brief reports, narrative reviews, commentaries, letters, perspectives, and research news that would advance wide range of interventions to ameliorate symptoms or alter the progression of chronic neurocognitive disorders such as dementia and Alzheimer''s disease. The journal will publish on topics related to medicine, geriatrics, neuroscience, neurophysiology, neurology, psychiatry, clinical psychology, bioinformatics, pharmaco-genetics, regulatory issues, health economics, pharmacoeconomics, and public health policy as these apply to preclinical and clinical research on therapeutics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信